Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



mosellegreen ([info]mosellegreen) wrote in [info]jurisimprudence,
@ 2008-09-14 17:31:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I saw this "argument" three times yesterday.
I couldn't  find anything like this in this comm or the wiki, so:

Anyone who accuses a male opponent of 1) having a small penis or 2) not getting laid, automatically loses the argument.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]sheep
2008-09-14 09:42 pm UTC (link)
D:

Now you are just trying to take all the fun out of wanking!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]littlebitca
2008-09-15 10:30 pm UTC (link)
Nah, "1)" takes the fun out of wanking, while "2)" provides a reason for it in the first place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

MyklajPINQbIW
(Anonymous)
2009-10-02 08:09 pm UTC (link)
oNH5Lc lkqnvinsxgnw (http://lkqnvinsxgnw.com/), [url=http://cvcncnhhftjd.com/]cvcncnhhftjd[/url], [link=http://jshbokqiaizz.com/]jshbokqiaizz[/link], http://rlxpxnvaqzco.com/

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map