Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Irony ([info]isntitironic) wrote in [info]jurisimprudence,
@ 2009-03-12 09:18:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
CICERO'S CAVEAT ON CRITICISM:

True Story: Marcus Tullius Cicero, proud owner of an ego the size of Mt. Vesuvius, once overheard Julius Caesar discussing one of his (Cicero's) poems. Caesar was full of praise for the piece, but thought it could have been improved upon in small ways. Upon hearing this, Cicero asked his brother Quintus to go bring up the poem in conversation with Caesar and find out exactly how it could have been better, but then cheerfully added that Caesar's criticism had not made him a bit less pleased with his work.

ERGO: just because a reviewer finds something to criticize does not mean that they hated the whole piece, or that the creator should not be proud of his efforts.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]undomielregina
2009-03-12 11:33 pm UTC (link)
but I liked Cicero

I had fun trying to figure out what the hell he was talking about half the time, and our professor used to give us exercises where he'd turn the periodic sentences into individual ones and then make us recombine them. Trying to get the right rhetorical flourishes was fun.

Latin poetry, in contrast, made me want to die.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map