Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Raev ([info]thoms) wrote in [info]operation_mock,
@ 2008-04-24 23:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
The best quote from the Jenna Miscavige Hill Nightline interview? Came from the Co$ response.

Every religion has its detractors; there is no faith that can satisfy everyone's spiritual needs, Scientology included. We wish Mrs. Hill well in her search for spiritual fulfillment.

... doesn't that completely contradict everything they usually say? Don't they claim that Scientology can be everything for everyone? Or is that just in my head?


(Post a new comment)


[info]aristaea
2008-04-25 06:27 am UTC (link)
Uh-oh, looks like someone needs some special auditing sessions!

Also, I watched the little webcast thing, and the guy said they were doing an interview with "the niece of the founder". FAIL ABC, FAIL.

(Reply to this)


[info]kahrohseh
2008-04-25 04:10 pm UTC (link)
I wonder what happened to "never defend, always attack"? I love how their statement goes on to say "we can't comment without attacking Jenna's character" because ad hominem is the only thing they know how to do.

Compare this to the segment in the Panorama expose, where a Scilon handler stalked Sweeney and Shawn Lonsdale to a secluded location to read a list of Shawn's dirty laundry before their cameras. Anon's definitely got them truly scared now. But surely being vaguely diplomatic is squirrelling the tech?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mmanurere
2008-04-25 05:57 pm UTC (link)
Ah, but "we can't comment without attacking Jenna's character" carries connotations of "because there's just so much wrong with her character that we can't say anything at all about her without it being about how terrible a person she is." So the Co$ has moved on to passive-aggressive "not-attacks".

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kahrohseh
2008-04-25 09:28 pm UTC (link)
I can't imagine it working in their favour even then. If I watched that article with no prior information, and got to that response, I'd go "oh shit, CONTROVERSY! I need to check out that site and see what the deal is!" Nothing inspires attention like the promise of wank. And then instead of wank they'll get sweet, sweet truth.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mmanurere
2008-04-25 10:25 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, they're still pretty horrendously incompetent. They just seem to be trying a new strategy to fail with.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]magic_lilybean
2008-04-25 08:23 pm UTC (link)
Anybody that missed it can find all kind of video link in this enturb thread.

I couldn't watch last night, but did this morning. And lo, much win was had.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map