|
|
Thursday, February 4th, 2010
| |
8:42 pm
|
helenvalentine
|
Been a bit quiet around these parts, so here's some fresh wank (thanks to a mousie in wank report).
Over on LJ, ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) plumtreeblossom posts a local news report to davis_square, a community for residents of Somerville, MA. Apparently, neighborhood creeper JonMon was arrested for throwing a loud party at which he served alcohol to hordes of teenage girls. Community members point and laugh.
turil is horrified and outraged and accuses everyone of "modern day witch hunting." When it is pointed out that the "witch" in question has been plying underage girls with alcohol for questionable purposes, turil begins defending statutory rape and opens up a big ol' can of HELL NO.
Highlights beneath the cut.
( It's like trying to reason with Jell-O )
Apparently turil has her own tag on the davis_snark community, as well as her own philosophy counseling business: She has taught young children about life, police officers about bicycling, and angry people about breathing. She has studied Positive Psychology, Buddhism, Integral Spirituality, Spiral Dynamics, Multiple Intelligences, Epistimology, Entomology, Socratic Inquiry, Urban Planning, Neuro-Linguistic Programming, and all manner of artistic media. She has no fancy capital letters after her name, and does not offer professional psychotherapy or medical advice in any way shape or form.
I must confess, I am somewhat in awe.
ETA: Apologies for not posting this in UFB--I did hesitate before putting it here, but then I found a section for rape wanks in the memories so I figured it'd be kosher. So yeah, wasn't sure. Nevertheless, not meaning to offend anyone and I won't make that mistake again.
|
|
(121 comments | comment on this)
|
| Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
| |
1:02 pm - Voter Fraud and Internet Popularity in 140 Characters or Less
|
beccastareyes
|
The Shorty Awards is a contest to select the best of Twitter in certain topics... by encouraging folks to tweet (or post their votes via Twitter) their votes, where the top five will go on to judging. Yeah, you can tell this will end well. One of the awards is for Health (or #health -- the hashtags on Twitter let you search for certain topics).
Anyway, this seems to be shaping up into a wankstorm. Not really because of the health issues themselves, though that plays a part, but mostly the standard of 'cheating, vote solicitation, and conspiracies'. The nominal issue is whether the Science-Based Medicine (SBM) or the Alternative Medicine (alt-med) should take the Shorty, but... well, it stops being about the medicine and more about which side wins.
The Cast
Science-Based Medicine/Skeptic Movement
Dr. Rachael Dunlop/@DrRachie -- Skeptical podcaster and heart-disease researcher on Twitter.
Orac -- Cancer surgeon, vaccination advocate, and medical blogger.
PZ Myers -- Skeptic, atheist and biologist, known for 'pharyngulizing' internet polls, which basically means posting links to informal internet polls on religion, science and so on, with the intent that his readers will push them in unexpected directions.
Tim Farley -- Vaccine advocate and blog commenter.
Alternative Medicine
Joseph Mercola/@mercola -- Osteopath and webmaster of a natural health site.
Mike Adams/@HealthRanger -- Webmaster of NaturalNews.com, an alt-med news site with a bit of a reputation for conspiracy-mongering.
Going to apologize - I follow Orac's blog, so most of my commentary is from there.
( Twitter Awards are Serious Business )
|
|
(75 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, January 17th, 2010
| |
12:35 pm - So. Much. Stupid.
|
|
| Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
| |
1:07 pm - Wind; hear my cry!
|
|
| Tuesday, December 15th, 2009
| |
6:54 pm - Satanic ritual abuse wank
|
vassilissa
|
I dithered about whether to put this in unfunnybusiness or here, but in the end Satanic Ritual Abuse is not real, and what the person who said it was said was so funny it belonged here.
People who blatantly deny the existence of ritual abuse after being offered solid resources to the contrary demonstrate that they don’t need evidence about its existence. Instead, when they continue to deny its existence in a seemingly obsessive manner, they are more likely trolling for new victims in hopes that responding survivors will – while more emotional – slip-up and provide vulnerable, personal information.
There you go. If you deny the existance of ritual abuse, it's because you're looking for new victims to ritually abuse.
|
|
(129 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, December 14th, 2009
| |
5:45 pm - reviewer's of this ilk
|
cesare
|
Why should ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif) fandom_wank have all the fun? This gem was reported on Dear Author, a romance novel review site, second story in the post.
The action takes place in the comments section on L. B. Taylor's customer review of Electra Galaxy's Mr. Interstellar Feller by Candace Sams. The review is titled "save your money" and concludes, "All over a sad excuse for romance, mystery, and humor. Save your money, you've been warned."
"Niteflyr One" comments on the review: "It looks like this reviewer has something personal against the author. Apparently, he/she doesn't know that most titles of this kind are written to please an editor these days and the editors are sometimes wrong in asking authors to re-write to 'their' specifications. But this review was more a diatribe on a comparison of 'other' stories the reader liked as opposed to reading the title and reviewing based on the new kind of work that it was meant to be."
Read it well, for these leitmotifs will recur for the next fifteen (and counting!) pages of comments: everyone who argues with Niteflyr has a grudge against her-- oh yeah, spoiler alert: Niteflyr is Candace Sams, the author, who'd have seen that coming-- personally and/or professionally; it's all the editor's fault for controlling the book down to the last micron; regardless of editorial tampering, though, people who don't like the book are just idiots.
( 'Even the lion has to defend himself against flies.' )
If you read this, get used to those repetitions and ellipses. There are lots of ellipses. And watch for other classic wank maneuvers you'll find along the way, including You're Just Jealous, You're All In On It, and The Lurkers Support Me In Email. Also keep an eye out for the glorious moment when she tells commenters they'd need Hooked On Phonics to be able to read her work.
One last treasure from Niteflyr: "Why not go after ST. Nick since you're all in such a festive mood." Hey, good idea. Has he written any shitty romance novels we can review?
|
|
(106 comments | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, December 3rd, 2009
| |
7:36 pm - Ebook drama!
|
elfwreck
|
This is *fascinating*. Really. I never get to see real ebook drama; it's usually "oh, I could never give up the smell of real books!" vs "umm, 300 books in my pocket, yay!" And then there's some mumblings on both sides, and they both move on and read books on whatever media tweaks their kinks. But not this time!
I bring you... Alan Kaufman vs Mobileread!
Who, you might ask, is Alan Kaufman? I don't know! Apparently, he's written some books. And he blogs about writerly things. And a little over a month ago, he wrote The Electronic Book Burning, in which he compares ebooks to Nazis:The book is fast becoming the despised Jew of our culture. Der Jude is now Der Book. Hi-tech propogandists tell us that the book is a tree-murdering, space-devouring, inferior form of technology; that society would simply be better-off altogether if we euthanized it even as we begin to carry around, like good little Aryans, whole libraries in our pockets, downloaded on the Uber-Kindle. Serious Godwin points for that. In an opening salvo, even. (It's okay, folks, he's Jewish, and that makes it okay for him to compare technological advances to the Holocaust. Erm.)
What's Mobileread? A website devoted to ebooks, ebook sources, ebook devices, and people who read ebooks. It's big. And active.
( Aaaaand they're off! In this corner, literary blogger Alan Kaufman. In that corner, the combined membership of Mobileread forums! )
|
|
(128 comments | comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009
| |
12:14 am - Scrapple, it's what's for breakfast.
|
platedlizard
|
Everyone loves vintage wank, and everyone loves food wank. So what happens when we mix the two of them together?
Pure Gold.
In thoroughly modern fashion, EPICURE’s recipe was almost immediately wikified. PORCUPINE warned against over-frying the scrapple, A HOUSEKEEPER swapped in Graham flour, and MIDDLETOWN gave her method for removing excess grease.
Only PHYSICIAN seemed content with the dish as it was, calling it “a positive luxury, throwing the Frenchman’s pâté de foie gras entirely into the shade.”
As always, the haters far outnumbered the fans: One reader declared that he’d just as soon fry bread in lard and eat it than partake in what others called an “abominable mess,” a “culinary fraud upon the stomach” and a great way to contract trichinosis.
Many thanks to the NY Times for the excellent wank report article.
|
|
(70 comments | comment on this)
|
| Saturday, November 28th, 2009
| |
1:25 pm - NaNoWriMo: The Bannination You've All Been Waiting For
|
ladylauren
|
marienbadmylove (profile now deleted) has been banned from the NaNoWriMo site for plagiarism.
i-rant-often had made a post dedicated to 'The Leech'. MBML took said post, ran it through his find-and-replacing and whatever other alterations he does, and posted it as his novel excerpt, thus violating the TOS of the NaNo site.
Part of the original rant: So far, this IDIOT writer of Marienbad My Love, supposedly the world's longest novel, has managed to attempt the weakest defense I've ever seen of his thieving ways. Of course, this comes in the wake of admitting to -- hell, I seriously think he was bragging about -- his methods of theft, and doing it on the NaNoWriMo forums.
MBML's alteration: TIRADE! To date, the MORON author of “Marienbad My Love,” allegedly the world's longest novel, has somehow launched the most pathetic excuse this covert government dream assassin has ever observed of these bold pilfering methods. Certainly, The Thug’s pleas and justifications are presented on the heels of acknowledging -- misery, I grimly believe he was swanking about – his methods of pilfering, and doing it on the Exogrid roundtables.
Protip: just because thesauruses exist does not automatically mean that using them is a good idea. Also, and this may seem obvious to most people, don't steal writing from someone who already dislikes you, as it is a recipe for banhammering.
In conclusion, i-rant-often dances on the grave:
At last . . . something remotely resembling justice!
(TRUE justice would require a steamroller with a defective transmission, several thousand wasps, a feather boa, a nest of red ants, an inept firing squad, a dull guillotine, eighteen metric tons of fecal matter from a pack of donkeys with gonhorrea, thirteen beautiful strippers unwilling to be touched by something as sick as the Leech, two dozen feral kittens and a catnip enema -- but I'll take what I can get!)
THE END (or is it?)
current mood: amused
current music: The Format -- 'Dead End'
|
|
(36 comments | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, November 12th, 2009
| |
6:43 pm - Go Google Go!
|
jkefka
|
Be ye warned: This is an incredibly nerdy wank and will involve a lot of programming jokes. That said, it's also pretty damn awesome. Picked up originally by platelizard in random_lounge.
Google, as we all know, is staffed by computer geniuses of the highest order, who program constantly. It seems that they found all the programming languages out there insufficient and clunky for their needs, so in a typically Google solution, they went and made their own. It even has its own mascot (the "Go Gopher"). Computer programmers everywhere jizz their britches, no wanking required. Google puts up an "Issue" form to report problems with the young language, and all is fine and dandy...
Until issue 9, titled "I have already used the name for *MY* programming language."
( 'Go,' 'Go!' and bad jokes no one will get )
|
|
(57 comments | comment on this)
|
| Saturday, November 7th, 2009
| |
1:54 am - NaNo: not just for wordsmushing any more!
|
|
| Friday, November 6th, 2009
| |
4:37 am - so wanky it's illegal!
|
mydemand
|
Lime Crime Makeup is a line of eyeshadow and lipstick by fashion blogger Doe Deere (Xenia), mainly known for its strong and unusual pigments.
Recently Lime Crime's come under fire for allegedly repackaging pigments by other companies such as Beauty of the Earth and TKB Trading. As more and more blogs post their own comparisons, others pop up to speak about past customer service experiences, including a post from Lillian who claims that Xenia called her mother an "asshole" for buying a dress of hers that was hemmed with duct/gaffer tape.
There is apparently a long history of Xenia's shenanigans, sparked by comments on an article on Lime Crime in the Examiner. The comments haven't all been positive (a lot of them have been deleted), but most damning is a comment allegedly by Xenia calling her customers stupid for choosing her overpriced products.
This saga inspires Lipsticks and Lightsabers to start be part of the Mineral Makeup Mutiny (edit: this comment by peonypavilion explains more) which highlights and supports companies that make their own mineral makeup. Meanwhile, there's been some investigation into her lipsticks, with Xenia's post on making lipstick (as well as the later one on making eyeshadows) attracting strong skepticism.
Yesterday, Xenia posted a video speaking out against the "haters", which rubs Lilian the wrong way as she feels she's unfairly being considered a liar. Xenia's response to her was (to Lilian's surprise) civil and composed; however, the same can't be said of Doe Deere commentor Mary, who thinks Lilian's only got a grudge because she's fat and that Lilian's on a power trip. (edit: Lillian's video about her issues with Xenia.)
Edit:
Xenia's entry with her video is closed to comments! (The ones already posted are still there though.)
eyeshadowsluts' posts about Lime Crime, as mentioned by eleutheria.
Blasts from the past via meanestbastard: The duct tape dress (Xenia's comments have been deleted), Where has the raffle money gone?, "violation of copyright", the mystery raffle winner, her journal's gone friends-only, relisting things that didn't sell. Oh and also Internet & copyright law fail.
Edit 2:
An insider's look at LBG drama. (The post itself is drama-free but does give some background.)
Edit 3:
A lone objective voice about this whole shabang-a-bang.
I'm somewhat surprised Xenia hasn't found this yet and threatened to take me down! does otf_wank do anon comments?
Edit 4:
I posted a non-wanky version of this on MetaFilter (mainly to highlight the video of Miss K/Aromaleigh making eyeshadow) and they call shenanigans:
( cut for length )
|
|
(98 comments | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, October 29th, 2009
| |
9:07 pm - My word count is pastede on yay, back for 2009!
|
ladylauren
|
Some of you may remember this wank from last year, revolving around a certain individual who decided to claim he'd 'won' NaNoWriMo by copying and pasting pages from Wikipedia and so on into Word and then using find and replace until it was a 'completely new and unique literary work'.
Well, he's back. With his profile page proudly boasting of last year's 'achievement' thusly:
My debut with NaNoWriMo was in 2008, when I completed a 2.5-million-word draft titled "The President Who Exploded." This work is what I call a “non-linear literary collage.” It consists of materials I mined from various blogs, chat rooms and fan fiction sites. I'm a word rustler. I prowl the talk pages of Wikipedia, the reader comments on io9.com and various venues frequented by anonymous bloggers. I shamelessly plagiarize their words -- even their misspellings and gramatical errors -- then transform the stolen content into a new and unique literary product through a series of computer-assisted modifications (cut-up engines, Markov generators, search and replace functions, etc.) and combinations with recycled content from my own writings. These are techniques I first explored in “Marienbad My Love,” the world's longest novel. Released in 2008, this 17-million-word creation also sets records for the world's longest word, sentence and book title.
Which, notably, is copypasta from his own website. Self-plagiarism must be the literary equivalent of sitting on your hand until it goes numb before masturbating.
Modus operandi announced, he trots into the 'Reaching the MILLION ...... NaNoWriMo 2009' The following exchange ensues:
marienbadmylove: I logged 2.5 million words last year. I'm swinging for 999,999-plus again this time. Let the good times roll!
Kateness: you know I don't think your words count, on the basis of our disagreement last year.
BUT
because the rules explicitly say I can't call you a cheater, I won't, because god knows that rule has helped me in the past, and we'll just leave it at that. If you think it's a win, it's a win (Just kindly keep your hands off any excerpts I may post, and my blog if you're so inclined), and that's all I'm going to say about this.
marienbadmylove: Ah, but how can you stop me? *snip some drivel about William Burroughs*
Dragonchilde (forum moderator extraordinaire: OH NO YOU DIDN'T *cites rules stating why he can't threaten to steal other Wrimos' writing*
marienbadmylove: *more gibberish about Burroughs that is kind of really not applicable in this situation at all*
Rest of responses: *dogpile without explicitly calling him a cheater* The best of which is Angolera's: There's a huge difference between writing 2.5 million words and using 2.5 million words.
marienbadmylove: *disappears from thread*
But where is he now? Oh, here he is, announcing his intention to hit 50,000 words on Day One to give himself a 'little cushion' on his way to the million. Please note he never states he's going to write these words, and is yet to return to the thread to pass comment on whether he is typing these words or using a voice recognition system. Funny about that.
And it's not even November yet...
Edit: Classic response from painkillers regarding the need of someone shooting for a million to sleep: Sleep? SLEEP? sleep is for writers, I'm a conceptual artist I am. ga ga goo goo ga ga, gin gang gooly, see it is the conception of the words that matter, not the words themselves. i don't need to sleep, because i don't use my brain -- for anything.
Son of edit: He reaches 50K!
current mood: Dramatic
current music: Crowded House -- 'There Goes God'
|
|
(126 comments | comment on this)
|
| Saturday, October 24th, 2009
| |
1:29 am - Ugly knit hats provide hope for the masses!
|
wankismyfandom
|
Knitting Daily featured the Champagne Fizz Hat in its free patterns section.
Kristin@37 kicks off the comments:
I love to knit. I will knit practically anything. I will not knit this.
Too foul by far.
Some agree; others decry her negativity and ask where her sense of fun has gone. ShuriuL explains that the hataz are interrogating the hat from the wrong perspective:
Ladies! Everyone's missing the point! This hat was probably inspired by Diane Von Furstenberg's Fall 2009 Ready-To-Wear collection, which had lovely knit sweaters, knit tunics, knit scarves, and knit coats. Every model wore this hat with variations. The pompoms were much bigger and the overall silhouette made the models appear to be wearing hats similar to men's Renaissance hats. This collection was made touching and whimsical when most designers on either side of the Atlantic had chosen to make monotone, aggressive, boxy, conservative clothing that was more masculine and warrior-like than feminine and patterned. It was a seminal collection and spoke of hope, optimism, and fun when last year's collections came out in February and people were more depressed and scared than they are now.
As for me, I just hope I'm not on LynnR@15's gift list:
Oh, aren't some people just too precious for this rough world?
This hat is terrific fun! Not for everyone to knit, or wear. It is a technically simple knit, with plenty of scope in yarns and colour for some individual, creative expression. Daring older people will delight in shocking their stuffy peers and younger people will think it a cool novelty.
I shall knit loads of these for Christmas prezzies, for young and old alike.
Long live eccentric knitting! (Yes, I'm going to shock my peers!)
|
|
(141 comments | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, October 22nd, 2009
| |
1:06 pm - Your bushes look like stupid lollipops
|
tetradecimal
|
If you need to borrow money from your neighbor but didn't get along with him too well, would you:
(a) Catch him on the street and ask him politely if he'd lend you a few bucks
(b) Knock on his door with a nice big slice of pie
(c) Tear out a sheet from your notepad and write a rambling, incoherent note to him in which you call him a whore and insult his shrubbery?
Link to the original note!
A transcript:
Carl
You make me sick. Your fancy house all that driveway, wowwy so long. Vacation wherever you want. Your bushes look like stupid lollipops, who does that anymore other than spoiled jerks with no taste.
I thought we were friends, when I had a job, right? I asked you to lend me money you said no. I was drinking, so what. I wasn't using so much drugs anymore. So what I had tires on my yard whats wrong with that? Those girls weren't hookers, they were friends much better friends than you, you're just a whore, a male whore. A more.
I can't stand you. You make sick.
Please I still need the money. Will you lend it to me? I will remove the tires, also the dishwasher.
Your friend friend
Steve
|
|
(69 comments | comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, October 14th, 2009
| |
10:01 pm - Epic Smackdown!
|
visp
|
So, for those of you who were blissfully unaware of who Orly Taitz is, allow me to shatter the last vestiges of your faith in humanity via wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz
Orly Taitz is an Orange County, California-based dentist and lawyer who is a leading figure in the "birther" movement which challenges whether Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen eligible to serve as President of the United States; in addition, she promotes a number of other conspiracy theories both related and unrelated to Obama. She runs a non-profit organization called the "Defend Our Freedoms Foundation".
Choice quotes of hers about Obama include " "I believe he is the most dangerous thing one can imagine, in that he represents radical communism and radical Islam: He was born and raised in radical Islam, all of his associations are with radical Islam, and he was groomed in the environment of the dirty Chicago mafia. Can there be anything scarier than that?"
Yup. Her most recent project has been representing a soldier who did not want to be sent to Iraq b/c she felt that since Obama wasn't a real president, he couldn't tell her what to do. And thus it begun
So most of this is in Judge Land's beautiful opinion (which I strongly reccomend you read) but it's 43 pages of glorious smackdown, so I will summarize from it and cite.
http://ia311028.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.28.0.pdf
|
|
(250 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, October 5th, 2009
| |
6:50 pm - If a marathoner runs outside of Boston and nobody's there to hear it, does it deserve a purple bar?
|
ruslan
|
It's the first (mini)wank of NaNo 2009! *pops champagne* Tiny, considering that the wankery is contained entirely in RiddleMeThis like some kind of nuclear radiation coffin, but passably amusing.
Okay, you all know what National Novel Writing Month is, right? It's an informal contest where the goal is to write a 50,000+ word novel in the month of November. You're not competing against other people and you don't really get anything if you "win" (aside from a feeling of accomplishment and a little purple bar beneath your forum name) but it's competitive enough that some people get really touchy over what constitutes a victory. Some people think the goal is to write a novel, some people think it's just to get 50,000 words down. The general consensus seems to be that as long as you're not doing this you're fine.
User chet-a-box posts asking:
I'm 90% sure I'll be writing a non-fiction book about my passion for giant pandas.
Is that allowed?
There are three or four responses, primarily by a staff member (Dragonchilde) saying very nicely that nobody's going to stop anybody from writing what they want, but *technically* it wouldn't really be the point of NaNo seeing as how they define a novel as a lengthy work of fiction. (Of course it should be noted that NaNo is welcoming of flexible approaches to the contest. They have a NaNo Rebels forum specifically for people who want to do things like write short stories or screenplays for their challenge. Additionally, the rules state that if the writer considers it a novel, they consider it a novel too). chet-a-box seems a little disappointed but takes it rather well and it's a polite, respectful, wankless thread. The end!
Well, no.
RiddleMeThis posts a thread in the NaNo Rebels forum entitled NaNoWriMo's Discrimination Against Creative Non-Fiction, saying that, essentially, non-fiction should be allowed to count as a NaNo victory because the state of our nation demands it.
( I didn't think you guys discriminated against pandas. )
|
|
(104 comments | comment on this)
|
| Friday, September 25th, 2009
| |
12:45 pm - When banning someone from a community, it's a good idea to make sure you've actually banned them.
|
gusty
|
abandonedplaces is a community for taking photographs of... well. Abandoned places. rhodamine is a frequent poster on said community, and somewhat infamous for not always posting things that are necessarily abandoned.
It all started a few days ago when cymbal_rush took it upon themselves to express a very strong opinion of rhodamine by making a new post to the community: "Dear rhodamine,
This community is dedicated to "abandoned places", not "random pictures I took while walking around on railway tracks in the boroughs". You have this habit of posting solitary pictures of things that clearly aren't of abandoned places, and always with a link to a particular external web site that merely re-displays the whole photo. You're clearly not here on Livejournal to do anything other than drive traffic to a web site you co-own (I mean, that's all you use Wikipedia for, too, right?), and I'm positive that I'm not the only one here that is getting tired of your spamming. So please, knock it off.
For a sense of what we're collectively interested in around here, have a look at the recent amazing posts by shktgun, villy_barankin, dedushka_nomto, seventreehouses, and many others."
There's both agreement and displeasure that cymbal_rush chose to use this public avenue to express their opinion, but the accused does not make an appearance. A day afterwards the mod of the community, jj_maccrimmon, makes a post announcing rhodamine has been banned and locks comments.
However, the REAL fun starts shortly after when poindexter makes a post to the community simply saying "It's been fun!" with the header 'Bye!'.
( Let me ride that FLOUNCY FLOUNCY! )
ETA: And now rhodamine's comments on the post have been deleted.
|
|
(69 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, September 20th, 2009
| |
6:29 pm - I doubt your committment to edginess
|
notjo
|
Once, long ago, an author released a book unto the world. And this book was considered to be awful by many many many critics, to the point where much parody was made of the author, the book, and the fans. This mockery ramped up when a movie was made, and even more people were introduced to the author. And, of course, all truly "hip" readers turned up their noses, refusing to call that... that... tripe... literature.
I am, of course, talking about Dan Brown.
Over at Literary Tattoos, Loosma writes:
I love Dan Brown, particularly his Robert Langdon series and I have huge respect for him and his research for his new book The Lost Symbol. I'm reading that now and I'm having a hard time putting it down but there are some great quotes in here. I keep wanting to highlight them and come back because sometimes I come across a sentence that hits me hard just because it relates to me in a way. As do everyone when they tattoo a quote or lyric or whatever on their body
Anyway, so really if any readers of those books have gotten a tattoo relating to the plot or through some quote in there? Especially puzzle lovers? lol
( Cue all the literary snark you can imagine )
I just want you all to know that I hated Dan Brown before it was "in" to hate Dan Brown. I bet it's now ~edgy~ to be scholar who loves Dan Brown for the plot, and I totes want to be ~edgy~. Dan Brown Forever! Go Robert Langdon!
|
|
(216 comments | comment on this)
|
| Friday, September 11th, 2009
| |
11:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|