Current mood:

energetic

Potential vintage_sex wank on the horizon
This is my first time so I hope I get it right.

russian_prof posted a few pictures to vintage_sex last night. Unfortuantely, rather than being vintage they are modern home pics of a woman wearing nothing but a few cds, lots of tape and a grin.

So far people are confused/amused but since it's obviouly a troll (and one that didn't use an lj-cut) I think there's a high potential for wank there.

Definitely one to watch.

ETA: Sadly, the original post has been deleted. However, the offending poster is back wondering why her post was deleted so that could be amusing.

(Post a new comment)

	bitca 2004-06-28 04:17 pm UTC (link)
	Deleted, alas. (Reply to this)

	ladysorka 2004-06-28 06:00 pm UTC (link)
	Deleted, le sigh. But now she's complaining about being deleted, so it's all good. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	cpip 2004-06-28 06:33 pm UTC (link)
	Wank that keeps giving! (Reply to this)(Parent)

cjk
2004-06-28 08:32 pm UTC (link)

Insanely enough, the journal is meant for Russian professionals (architects, engineers, etc) to post articles about a particular accident that made the news a while ago. Apparently they also have a political agenda, calling for the creation of an independent comission to look at the accident, etc.

Possibly several people have access to the account, and somebody mis-appropriated it, or it was hacked. Since it's an obvious troll, either's possible. ;)

(Reply to this)

	moonjaguar 2004-06-28 09:06 pm UTC (link)
	Are you discriminating me just because of my age? Um.. what kind of paranoiac reaction is that? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	lurker32 2004-06-28 09:07 pm UTC (link)
	She did get a lot of "OMG lookit the hag!!!" / "wow, she's hot for an old lady" comments before it was deleted. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	moonjaguar 2004-06-28 09:27 pm UTC (link)
	Ah, okay. I did follow her LJ and thought, well, she's in pretty durn good shape for a 50+er unless something iz pastede on yay but I'd think she'd've had half a brain and read the info on vintage_sex and realized that wasn't the specialty community for her pix. Or else she's just a troll. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	lurker32 2004-06-28 10:39 pm UTC (link)
	I'm torn. I tend to think "never attribute to trolling what can be explained by pure stupidity". (Reply to this)(Parent)

	cleolinda 2004-06-28 10:49 pm UTC (link)
	Maybe she thought her, uh, maturity provided the "vintage"? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	moonjaguar 2004-06-28 10:58 pm UTC (link)
	In that case since I was born before 1970, I could post pix of myself covered with DVDs and say "they're vintage because I am!" Er... nah. I'll spare people's eyeballs. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	llama_treats 2004-06-29 03:20 am UTC (link)
	No, no, no. You'd have to be covered in laserdiscs. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	moonjaguar 2004-06-29 03:49 am UTC (link)
	Can I cover myself in 45s, LPs and 78s instead? How about those records that were on the back of cereal boxes and stuck in the pages of MAD magazine? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	llama_treats 2004-06-29 04:11 am UTC (link)
	You could always try 8-tracks or reel-to-reel tapes, if you want to feel really "vintage"... (Reply to this)(Parent)