Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



The Sinister Dr. Larimer ([info]phosfate) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2004-07-26 08:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Gobsmacked

Meet Karen Hershenson. She's the Arts and Entertainment editor, apparently, for the Contra Costa Times. She's irked because she got suckered by a Sci-Fi Channel mockumentary about M. Night Shyamalan. You know - the one that was outed as a hoax last week, even if the internal textual evidence wouldn't have been more than enough to tip off the viewer?



http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/living/9225022.htm?1c
Posted on Fri, Jul. 23, 2004

AND ANOTHER THING

Shame on Sci Fi and Shyamalan for hoax

I FEEL SO STUPID. So ripped off. And it's all M. Night Shyamalan's fault.

For a couple weeks, I'd been seeing teaser ads for a Sci Fi Channel documentary on Shyamalan, the director whose eerie movies such as "The Sixth Sense" and "Signs" have done killer box office and earned him a devoted following. His latest, "The Village," opens July 30.

The great thing about these movies is that they don't hit you over the head with horror; they're subtle, parlaying our own deep-seated fears and suspicions into something tangible. Shyamalan's movies get under your skin the way Hitchcock gets under your skin.

Supposedly, the Sci-Fi filmmakers had started out making a straightforward documentary about the director, but when they dug too deep, he withdrew from the project. Still, they forged ahead, uncovering surprising elements of his past. "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" promised intrigue, and was promoted with rare fervor.

I like Shyamalan's films (well, except "Unbreakable"), as does my 14-year-old son, so we made plans to watch the three-hour documentary Sunday night. Even my husband, who usually checks out because he has to get up early for work, joined us.

The show was mesmerizing, building in intensity until we were all convinced that Shyamalan was in touch with the spirit world and that his movies were basically autobiographical. There were young groupie boys who looked liked zombies and a hyperactive Ouija board. Crows lighted whenever Shyamalan was onscreen, and the pizza guy gets so spooked by a Polaroid of the director (surrounded by a halo of strange light) that he bolts from the hotel room. There were unexplained technical difficulties during filming.

The climax comes when the filmmakers, who are no longer in touch with Shyamalan, discover that he nearly drowned -- maybe even completely drowned -- when he was a boy.

By the end, we just sat there, stunned. My son peppered me with questions about the supernatural: Does it exist? Can you see ghosts? Do crows mean anything? Can you stay at the bottom of a frozen pond for 35 minutes and live?

We had a long discussion about near-death experiences, with me telling him about people who claim to float above themselves in operating rooms, then snap back to life. By the time we went to bed, we all had the heebie-jeebies.

First thing Monday morning, I e-mailed our film critic asking if she had seen it. But before I could further make a fool of myself, a co-worker showed me an L.A. Times piece: "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" was a hoax.

The guy is no more haunted than my cat, Lola.

Turns out the whole documentary was nothing more than an elaborate "Blair Witch Project"-type ruse. An over-the-top scheme to promote "The Village." Hollywood yanking us around by the choke-collar yet again.

Apparently the Associated Press and some online sites broke this news before the documentary aired, but I didn't see those reports.

"Perhaps we might have taken the guerrilla campaign one step too far," Sci Fi Channel president Bonnie Hammer stated. "We thought it would create controversy and it probably went one step too far."

The whole episode has really upset me for some reason. I hate to be duped. As a journalist, I like to think that I negotiate the media with a healthy dollop of cynicism; that I'm not easily taken. (Although I do know that compared to some of my colleagues, I'm pretty much Pollyanna.)

In a way, the whole "Buried Secret" campaign was a master stroke on Shyamalan's part -- yes, he was in on the deception from the beginning. It's raised my awareness of "The Village," a movie that really wasn't too high on my must-see list, unlike, say, "The Door in the Floor" or "Before Sunset."

So yeah, you guys pulled one over on us, the gullible public. Go you.

But is this what we want the media to do -- manipulate us? Ever since Orson Welles created widespread panic with his "The War of the Worlds" broadcast, we've understood the power that radio, television and print can have; movies too. In these highly political times, we newspaper types have tried more than ever to be really clear with readers, citing sources for even the tiniest bits of information.

But that's just us. The Sci Fi Channel and M. Night Shyamalan are show business. And as we know, Hollywood operates under a whole different set of rules. No rules, really.
----------------------------------------------
Karen Hershenson is the Times arts and entertainment editor. Reach her at khershen@cctimes.com, 925-XXX-XXXX.



(Post a new comment)


[info]smo
2004-07-26 03:28 pm UTC (link)
I FEEL SO STUPID. So ripped off. And it's all M. Night Shyamalan's fault.

No, dear, the stupid is all you.

But is this what we want the media to do -- manipulate us?

If I'm reading/watching actual news about shit that actually matters, no. If I'm watching something on the freaking SCI-FI CHANNEL about a MOVIE DIRECTOR known for his TWIST ENDINGS (which should have clue-by-foured her in right there), then you're damn skippy, I wanna be manipulated.

(Reply to this)


[info]shinigami_co
2004-07-26 04:19 pm UTC (link)
Aww...dah poor widdle jounawist got duped and now her poor widdle pwide is bwuised. Poor widdle jounawist.

Someone get this chick a WAHmbulance, stat!

(Reply to this)


[info]singe
2004-07-26 04:45 pm UTC (link)
Oh, tuh.

Crows, polaroids with haloes and creeeeepy Near Death Experiences? Yeah, I see that on CNN all the damn time. Shaaaaame on you Sci fi channel and Mr. Shyalalalalalaman! How dare you entertain us!

(Reply to this)


[info]shoiryu
2004-07-26 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Cry us a river, sweetcheeks.

(Reply to this)


[info]deoridhe
2004-07-26 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Now I really wanna see the mockumentary...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ecchaniz0r
2004-07-27 05:31 pm UTC (link)
Me toooooooooooo~~~

*whinygeek*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lurker32
2004-07-26 05:10 pm UTC (link)
Ever since Orson Welles created widespread panic with his "The War of the Worlds" broadcast, we've understood the power that radio, television and print can have; movies too.

So you fell for the paranormal shtick why, if you understood it so well, O wise and jaded one?

In these highly political times, we newspaper types have tried more than ever to be really clear with readers

*snorts* *chokes* Bwahahahahahahaaaa!

(Reply to this)


[info]llama_treats
2004-07-26 05:12 pm UTC (link)
I would think the commercials for "The Village" every five seconds would have tipped her off.

["Unbreakable" was bad? Did this woman even see "Signs"?! Now, that was a load of crap.]

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2004-07-26 08:41 pm UTC (link)
I have an unholy love for Signs, just because it's such a wonderfully huge pile of unbelievable twaddle that still manages to scare me. Because I'm a royal chump. And it's got the Hershey Kiss tinfoil hats. And the South American kid's birthday party video.

I see a lot of people who seem to be pissed off by Unbreakable because it turns out to be - oh, dear God! - a super-hero movie. Muhuhuhuh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-07-26 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-07-27 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cie_anthy, 2004-07-27 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-07-27 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-07-27 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-07-27 05:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gaisce, 2004-07-27 08:15 pm UTC

[info]lurker32
2004-07-26 08:56 pm UTC (link)
I liked Signs, except for Mel Gibson. But then I'm easily pleased.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tempslut
2004-07-26 09:31 pm UTC (link)
["Unbreakable" was bad? Did this woman even see "Signs"?! Now, that was a load of crap.]

No kidding! Especially since the aliens looked too much like the Jolly Green Giant to scare me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]teratologist
2004-07-26 05:19 pm UTC (link)
Duh, everyone knows that ghosts can't handle cameras.

Now I actually want to see this mockumentary, when I had decided never to watch anything M. N. S. had so much as breathed on again after the ending of Signs, so I guess that bad old manipulative media worked.

(Reply to this)


[info]judyhazeleyes
2004-07-26 06:49 pm UTC (link)
But is this what we want the media to do -- manipulate us?

She really IS Pollyanna. It's almost charming, in a sad sort of way. Here's hoping she never ends up at CNN - the shock might give her a damned heart attack.

(Reply to this)


[info]onetrickpony
2004-07-26 07:31 pm UTC (link)
It's quite cute really. I want to know how she survived as a journalist log enough to become an arts and entertainment editor without figuring out that the media is -gasp- manipulative!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gaisce, 2004-07-27 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-07-27 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-07-27 02:48 pm UTC

[info]plazmah
2004-07-26 07:43 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, what the last two commenters said. "OMG the media can't manipulate us!!! INJUSTICE!" Whatever, lady. Where's my clue-by-four??

(Reply to this)


[info]isntitironic
2004-07-26 08:19 pm UTC (link)
I think her article is part of the hoax, to make the mockumentary sound more convincing than it is. Because give me a fuckin' break, lady.

James Randi is probably having a psychotic episode long about now.

(Reply to this)


[info]crickets
2004-07-26 09:44 pm UTC (link)
I watched it all the way through (had it on in the background while I was online) only to see where they'd go with it. It was mildly entertaining, though predictable and obviously a fake. Given the mock nature of the whole thing, it also came off as incredibly self-serving. The only really good part was the interview with Johnny Depp. I watched with my jaw hanging open, thinking, "how the hell did they talk him into that?"

I hate to be duped. As a journalist, I like to think that I negotiate the media with a healthy dollop of cynicism; that I'm not easily taken.

Aww, po' thing. Tag, you're it, hee!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-07-26 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-07-26 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-07-27 12:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-07-27 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrenlet, 2004-07-27 01:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-07-27 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-07-27 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2004-07-27 08:06 am UTC

[info]sorchar
2004-07-26 10:03 pm UTC (link)
What a whiner.

(Reply to this)


[info]littlest_lurker
2004-07-27 12:15 am UTC (link)
I remember reading this! I don't know why she's acting so surprised, considering a similar stunt was pulled with The Blair Witch Project. Which I fell for hook line and sinker at the time.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-07-27 01:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-07-27 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-07-27 05:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-07-27 06:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-07-27 02:31 pm UTC

[info]sesana
2004-07-27 02:28 am UTC (link)
I knew that doc was fake as soon as I saw the first ads for it on the SciFi channel. I think that was in May? It was just way too Blair Witch to be real. I refuse to believe that somebody saw the ads, looked forward to the show, watched every minute of it, discussed it for an extended period of time, brooded over it all night long, and still didn't realize it was a mockumentary. The last shreds of my faith in humanity are at stake here.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

golden rules - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 10:00 am UTC
Re: golden rules - [info]sesana, 2004-07-29 02:39 am UTC

[info]munchkinott
2004-07-27 04:09 am UTC (link)
I see stupid people. I see them all the time, sometimes they don't know they're stupid. They're so stupid they don't even notice when a joke's been done before (Ghost Watch, BBC, '92/'93-ish).

Sometimes... They're journalists.

(Reply to this)


[info]virago
2004-07-27 04:28 am UTC (link)
Aaaahahahahaha!

I can see the office before this. "Oh, tell Mrs. H. to review the Shyamalan show. She'll probably believe it. This'll be great!"

Really, it doesn't get any better than the opening line. I'm a moron, and it's all your fault! Actually that could be iconned into nearly anything. It's a battle cry. <3

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]virago, 2004-07-27 04:28 am UTC
Lightnin' 'as just struck my brain - [info]lurker32, 2004-07-27 04:58 am UTC

[info]criticalcricket
2004-07-27 07:15 am UTC (link)
All that whining, where's the cheese?

She's making even more of a fool of herself by crying about it like that. People like us just sit around shaking our heads and laughing our asses off.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bakashinobi, 2004-07-27 02:13 pm UTC
Bwahaaaa.
[info]ecchaniz0r
2004-07-27 05:26 pm UTC (link)
But is this what we want the media to do -- manipulate us?

By and large, ma'am, that's this particular media's raison d'être.

In a way, the whole "Buried Secret" campaign was a master stroke on Shyamalan's part -- yes, he was in on the deception from the beginning.

I KNEW I liked this guy! :D

(Reply to this)


[info]veuki
2004-07-31 05:22 am UTC (link)
I still can't get over the fact that she wrote an article about being duped. It's like slapping a big, glaring neon sign on your face that reads, KICK ME, I'M A DUMBASS. She should've just stared at the coworker who told her that Buried Secrets was a hoax, and then let out a hearty guffaw and said, "That was so five minutes ago! I knew that all along, oh right!"

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map