Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Anise Thunderpickle ([info]puipui) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
Except that the Supreme Court (in most cases, when they're doing their job correctly) doesn't look at morality, they look at constitutionality, and in general they're pretty damn strict about only looking at that.

And, really, if you think about it, when it comes to the Supreme Court, then throwing the laws out would actually be considered more conservative than keeping them, because it's the stricter interpretation of the Constitution that going to get them tossed, while only a far more liberal interpretation would allow them.

I honestly believe that the Supreme Court is going to throw down a Roe v. Wade thing once this gets there. It's just the getting there that going to be the big pain in the ass. So, really, it can almost be seen as a good thing that so many laws got passed against it, because it'll make it just that much easier to get to the Supreme Court, really.

Yes, I'm being an optimist. So sue me. *sighs*


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map