Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Wham bam, we're in a jam! ([info]sarajayechan) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-01-19 19:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*thud*
Current music:The TV

Sex wank (I feel so redundant)
In [info]sextips, [info]samizdatcourier says:

If one's girlfriend refuses to/absolutely does not practice anal sex and oral sex then the only reasonable solution is to dump them and move on.

Why?

Well, for every girl who won't do anal and oral there are probably four more who are prettier, funnier, more fun, and most importaly four more who WILL do both anal and oral. I mean, who in their right mind would want to stay with a limited edition -- someone with prosaic rules and limits -- when the accessable and easy are so plentiful?


People either agree or disagree.

The OP has yet to respond to anyone, but the comments thread is only 2 pages long. Besides, even without a lot of wank in the comments yet, the OP is wanking plenty hard as it is.



(Post a new comment)


[info]smo
2005-01-20 01:58 am UTC (link)
Trouble is, a lot of guys who want their girl to perform oral and anal sex aren't willing to reciprocate. Frelling hypocrites.

(Reply to this)


[info]krazycat
2005-01-20 02:16 am UTC (link)
*blinkblink*

Did that dude seriously put anal and oral in the same category? Because seriously, having a dick in your mouth and taking one in the ass - not quite the same thing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]krazycat
2005-01-20 02:17 am UTC (link)
I just put seriously twice in that comment, didn't I..
Silly me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ashenmote
2005-01-20 02:32 am UTC (link)
Quite. The former is widely known as a sexual favor and maybe even a sign of affection, while the latter is an exercise you perform with a so called 'beta' to improve your writing skills.

[/things I learned on F_W]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(Deleted post)

[info]ashenmote
2005-01-20 05:24 am UTC (link)
We best don't tell him that they found each other already.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mistressrenet
2005-01-20 02:40 pm UTC (link)
I think I love you....

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ashenmote
2005-01-20 07:10 pm UTC (link)
Hu, thanks :)
That was easy. You are a member of the legendary 'Accessable & Easy Four' Superhero Team, yes?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mistressrenet
2005-01-20 07:40 pm UTC (link)
New icon!

...did my cape give it away?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ashenmote
2005-01-21 04:40 am UTC (link)
:)

Yes! That and the hip motion!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


meshou
2005-01-20 02:29 am UTC (link)
To be fair, I don't think I could go out with a guy squicked by female oral. Don't want a guy who thinks girl bits are dirty and gross.

On the other hand, I fully expect this dude to accommodate a strap-on wearing girlfriend. After all, for every guy who won't bend over, there are hundreds of guys just as pretty who will.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]smo
2005-01-20 02:57 am UTC (link)
He's probably worried he might like it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]feenix
2005-01-20 02:45 am UTC (link)
the OP is wanking plenty hard as it is

I imagine he is.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]smo
2005-01-20 02:59 am UTC (link)
Naturally. Who else could he get a date with other than Rosy Palm and her five sisters?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mooncalf
2005-01-20 04:21 am UTC (link)
Hands up everyone who wants samizdatcourier and darrendannygirl to start dating!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ashenmote
2005-01-20 04:43 am UTC (link)
*lotsa hands*
OTP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sarajayechan
2005-01-20 04:46 am UTC (link)
Theirloveissoselfish!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ashenmote
2005-01-20 05:27 am UTC (link)
TheirloveismorehopelessthanMelliusandGretelina!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mistressrenet
2005-01-20 02:41 pm UTC (link)
My new OTP!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kookaburra
2005-01-20 05:39 am UTC (link)
Ha ha ha! With all the people asserting that they will NEVER do something, it reminds me of how my step father swore up and down how he would never, never, NEVER get involved with another woman, right before leaving for the airport, to go to the city where he would meet my mother for the first time. This is why it's a good idea to never say, "never".

(Reply to this)


[info]kalika_maxwell
2005-01-20 05:51 am UTC (link)
I can probably be convinced to try a long list of things. But only if the dear other half is prepared to do the same. I claim equal play rights. *nodnod*

(Reply to this)


[info]blue_linnet
2005-01-20 06:43 am UTC (link)
My opinion on whether or not this guy is a total asshole, or merely insensitive as hell, rides completely on whether or not he's willing to reciprocate. Because if he is, then he's still a jerk for posting with that tone, like everyone who doesn't do what he likes is completely insane.

I don't think being somewhat limited in what one's willing to do sexually makes one a failure, which seems to be the idea put forth by a lot of people I know. Just find someone who is with you on that one, and those who are more adventurous can also find like-minded partners. If everyone is happy, nobody's superior to anyone else for that reason.

I just find people assy when they expect something as a matter of course and aren't willing to follow through.

(Reply to this)


[info]gal_montag
2005-01-20 08:09 am UTC (link)
Aw, baleted.

But hey, I'll happily let you stick your dick in my ass if you'll let me buttfuck you too. Quid pro quo, Clarice.

(Reply to this)


[info]funwithrage
2005-01-20 06:38 pm UTC (link)
On the one hand, people get into relationships for various reasons; if you're not getting what you want out of one, be it sex, anal, oral, love, puppies, etc, it's reasonable to end it. I have no problem with "put out or get out," and I confess I do regard with a certain amount of suspicion any sexually active girl or guy in this day and age who doesn't do oral.


On the other hand, to paraphrase Dan Savage, if you don't want something and the person you're with doesn't want to do it...there's really no problem here. (And, you know, rules and limits are pretty reasonable at one stage or another.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]arielchan
2005-01-24 04:29 am UTC (link)
I do regard with a certain amount of suspicion any sexually active girl or guy in this day and age who doesn't do oral.

Agreed. It seems to be expected, almost required, and especially in the case of girls. There's also that wonderful movement of girls demanding to get exactly what that give out that's making more guys willing to preform. (That having been said, TMI, but my boyfriend honestly hates going down on girls and I don't make them. I am a demi-hypocrite.)

~*Ariel*~

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-01-21 01:11 am UTC (link)
Bahleeted. Furl next time plzkthx.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sarajayechan
2005-01-21 01:12 am UTC (link)
Dang.

*doesn't have FURL account*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mastervex
2005-01-21 04:48 am UTC (link)
It doesn't bother me that some guy's main requirements for a relationship are which sexual acts his partner will do...it's not as if I wanted to date him. The bit that irritates me is his talking like that is and should be everyone's priority.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map