Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Pip's Sister ([info]pipssister) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-01-22 09:51:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Bitch, Please...

Someone failed logic class...
So Harvard released a report saying that PG-13 films have gotten progressively vulgar. This isn't too surprising - movie critics such as Roger Ebert and James Berardinelli have been saying it for awhile.

Of course, Thomas Carder thinks that this means CAPalert has won and that American films should be judged by CAP standards NOW!

Choice quotes:

Scanning through the article I find, point by point, the CAP Analysis Model provides and has always provided that which is claimed to be needed but absent from the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating system: that indeed the CAP Analysis Model could replace the MPAA. And the CAP Analysis Model provides it OBJECTIVELY, not vulnerable to mood and preference subjectivity so YOU can be in a better position to have the information YOU need to make an informed moral decision whether a film is fit for your kids (or yourself).

Yeah, because basing a rating system on the Christian bible is totally "objective."



(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map