|
|
Monday, March 29th, 2004
|
4:16a - Online Audio Fans- Even the Wank is highly compressed
Tiny, old wank here- it's a bit like a tsetse fly perfectly preserved in amber.
So clear, so concise, so rich and virulent in content...
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/2958.cfm
current mood: annoyed (13 comments |comment on this)
|
9:14a - Think of the children!
Flugie62 panicks when s/he thinks s/he spots Ben Stiller's "thingie" in "Starsky & Hutch." I'm really not sure what to call him/her, other than pathetic.
current mood: energetic (19 comments |comment on this)
|
2:27p - I am Wummun, Hear Me Wank!
On the Ms. boards, Audra posts a link to Heather Corinna's site, calling her a "visionary."
Others beg to diffah, and wank ensues (for which, I might add, several users in the thread have already been banned).
Look! Godwin's Law!
I made it to page 6 before I started skimming any post longer than three paragraphs. Jargon gives me brainache.
What would one say in a situation like this, I wonder? "YOU! Out of my... cause?" (The wankers, not the OP.)
current mood: scared (109 comments |comment on this)
|
5:09p
For April Fools' Day, moroveus decides that he wants to pick on the conservatives by doing the old Somethingawful.com switcheroo. Most of his friends congratulate him for being so *cough* brilliant. I guess the trick was leaked or something, because he trips the prank early, with the switched graphic pointing to this page.
Perhaps to fit in with the crowd, he also congratulates himself. Lots of people are less amused. The moderator of the Republican nation community even closes posting in the community (and also deletes a beautifully juicy thread of wank. Le sigh).
Then his friend req posts in blog_sociology, ostensibly raising the issue of whether or not a trick like that is a good use of blogs. Most of the other members seem pretty bored by it. If anything, they remark on its level of maturity. But one user does get a little splurty.
(13 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|