|
|
Monday, August 2nd, 2004
|
11:55a - Now, Live, From Unreal Land!
I found this whole concept wanky. As a plus there's a wanky anonymouse in the bottom comment stirring up trouble.
Wanna be in the front of our live, studio audience? Hot blondes only need apply!
Do they really *pay* attractive people to be in the camera's range for soap opera talk shows?
Oy. The very idea is a mental sploogefest.
current mood: Dramatic (2 comments |comment on this)
|
6:23p - Natural wank hot spring in my own journal?
Back in March, I created a petition meme that threatened our American way of Freedom and caused moral outrage. Or something. (The last two links take you to entries I made in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif) i_wank.)
Today LiveJournal announced a new tool that displays recent comments made in your journal. I hopped over to see it found - this grudge match. gothkat thinks goldenzoltan and whitcomb should be banned from the internet, and whitcomb thinks gothkat is a steaming bag of crap. I'm inclined to agree with both of them.
This is obviously the tail end of a wank that began elsewhere, but I'm too lazy to find out which journal belongs to eevee.
(I wonder if they noticed that they're wanking in someone else's journal.)
current music: Elvis Costello & The Attractions - Tokyo Storm Warning (12 comments |comment on this)
|
8:57p
Every now and then, someone in the found_objects community throws a fit. The community's focus is supposed to be about artistic photographs of found objects, and occasionally the mod makes a call about a post that's not quite up to snuff and deletes it, or some of the members speak up to question whether the photos are artistic. This tends to create "OMG aren't I GOOD enough for you SNOTS" and "but what is ART?!" wankery.
Here's the latest installation, in which brenden gets miffed that a post of hers was deleted.
Edit: Baleeted already! Dang. I knew I should've screencapped it.
(8 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|