|
|
Tuesday, February 22nd, 2005
|
2:00a - Small, but more splooge than I'd expect from a zombie
Over on blog_sociology, zombigasm (who may be known by day as desertscorpion) makes a post debating the sociological merits of... um... I don't know what. Letting the intarweb trolls go hungry, I guess.
But no, he's not just trolling. Well okay, he is, but he's also Making a Serious Point. Again, about what is anybody's guess.
The gist of the replies from the community is mostly along the lines of either "Anal Cunt is teh funny" or "Yes, and?"
Annieamaryllis offers the erudite English major version of what he just said. Zombiegasm is unamused.
Some people are offended</a> by the language in the initial post.
Zombiegasm is himself deeply frustrated offended by his inability to be very offensive.
A couple people call troll, and it kind of peters out.
(19 comments |comment on this)
|
8:00p
"Wow, it's a slow wank day," I said to myself. "There has to be wank somewhere."
Then I said, "And it's probably on the ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) feminist community.
And lo, I was right. Today, the feminists tackle the question "If a girl consents to sex but she thinks she's having sex with someone else, is it rape?"
(82 comments |comment on this)
|
9:38p - Donated by a watchful anonymouse.
As a followup to the last Hunter S. Thompson wank, we have another one here, from the ever-present ginmar, veteran of more than one wank. Anyway, she posts a quote from the late writer himself, proceeding to accuse him of glamourising rape.
On the subject of rape fantasies.
Hexyhex is shot down.
Writing is not always real.
Edited to add links. And to say that badmouthing the dead is probably quite wanky enough for some people, even without the comments.
Edit no.2 to add this, the thread that preceded the one in the wank, and this thread, which mostly concerns rape fantasy. Donated by the anonymouse below.
(144 comments |comment on this)
|
9:45p - Late fees...or not?
Perusing my second home of customers_suck, I found this gem.
Hopefully it hasn't been wanked yet, though I scanned back a bit and didn't see it.
Blockbuster employees vs Blockbuster customers... FIGHT!
Customers say Blockbuster should have told them they'd get charged. Employees say that it should be OBVIOUS you'd get charged (eventually). Customers bitch about not wanting to actually own the movies. Employees point out they could still just return them, and get most of their money back.
Earth logic vs Pissed Off Customers. Oh, the wank.
I have no words,really, but man, is it ever fun to watch the bitchfest going down.
Favorite comment so far: "Renting something and then not returning it is called "theft"." Tell me: which would you prefer? Having that 30 day extended rental for just $1.25, or being stuck with something you really don't want, just because you were too fucking lazy to make a pit stop on your way to suck more fa(s)t food down your gullet and to your ass?
current mood: *thud*
current music: Utada Hikaru - Kremlin Dusk (44 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|