|
|
Monday, August 15th, 2005
|
1:05p - Your Kink is Sexist!
![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) geca makes a post to feminist linking the site Taken in Hand that focuses on female submission in relationships, including articles entitled "The Gift of Rape". The initial response to the post is one of disgust and derision, until someone points out that the site is in actuality a BDSM site focusing on female submission, and that the concept of rape put forth by the site isn't really rape at all.
The original poster is accused of taking things out of context, and things seem to be going smoothly. Until chessdev speaks up. The people who defend BDSM liken it to homosexuality, and those against it liken it to marital rape and domestic violence and they question whether any woman who is submissive in their relationships can be strong and independent, regardless if whether they choose too.
endersvalentine asks whether BDSM relationships are psychologically healthy. And then things really hit the fan when 0xmahliax0 comments that the threads on the post don't make her really comfortable, because she practices BDSM and accuses feminism of being hypocritical. endersvalentine tells her go cry a river and basically that nobody cares. From there it is a bunch of the same arguments, and brings the idea that BDSM is a type of self harm.
karnythia, who staunchly defended the practice BDSM in the first thread, starts a new post in hopes of showing that one can reconcile BDSM with feminism, and gangsta_ho_bag responds and says that even so, the ideas brought up in the other thread still make her uncomfortable. karnythia asks why and the entire thread explodes.
(38 comments |comment on this)
|
4:56p - The Anus Is Self-Lubricating
Because somebody needs to share the joy pain with the JF world, god damnit.
In the LJ community Little Details, someone requests information on an unpleasant topic: rape and pedophilia. The answers are fairly sane and informative (child rape will fuck your character up!), until klavierbarrette adds her two self-contradictory cents:
The anus is self lubricating so sure it's possible to have anal sex without lube. But it will hurt. A lot. Especially for a little boy. He will probably have a lot of bleeding and some tearing, probably some bruising around that area. If the rapist is not careful he could even tear the boy enough for him to sustain enough injuries there for it to be very serious for the boy, he could slowly bleed out.
To furikku's well-reasoned response (Since when?!), klavierbarrette responds with: Is it not? Perhaps I have a special anus.
( And the trolls, they are descending. Like in the films of Hollywood. )
Silvestris also makes claims of spontaneous anal lubrication.
The queers are still not ready to give up their lube...
pussinboots:
The anus is not self-lubricating at all. Not even a tiny bit.
"Special" highlight: pussinboots' alteration of Klavier's icon. (This of course raises the specter of COPYRIGHT.)
Small, but tasty soul-killing. Keep an eye out for the nose-sex thread.
current mood: WTF MATE (111 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|