|
|
Tuesday, April 18th, 2006
|
3:27a - bad_sex wank
Oh, so apt.
mgo_2_14 posts about a new Connecticut would-be law, i.e. you can't ejaculate on someone's face without their consent.
unperfekt comments: all the ladeez ask for it.
remember: no means yes. yes means twice.
And we're off!
fuckedupinpink: I don't think you have to be a ranting, raging feminist to say: don't fuck with, or triviliaze, the act of consent.
talshoe replies: So, fuckedupinpink, when was it that daddy touched you in the bikini area?... But I'm no psychologist or nothing (noted by the assault on english grammar), but isn't polyamory a way to compensate for sexual abuse as a minor?
And rape isn't funny, damn it!
Ah, rape-related wank. You'll never cease to be fun. But wait, I laughed about something related to rape. I guess I'll just turn in my license to be female now.
(58 comments |comment on this)
|
11:55a - Kitten + Spider = Wank
almostpretty posts a quote about crantz, who used EDIT: his kitten to bat down a spider:
"So I did the logical thing.
I grabbed my kitten and swiped her through the web until enough of it was gone that I could walk through without touching it. As I left with my stuff, she was on the floor happily purring and eating the spider."
Most people are amused. But not supremegoddess1, who complains that this should be posted to stupid pet owners.. Because this is cat torture and the equivalent of using your toddler as a mop.
Others point and snicker.
--Kitti
current mood: amused (102 comments |comment on this)
|
3:13p - People have sex in College? NO WAI!
Girl posts amusing entry about sexual misadventures in her dorm room.
barbedvelvet thinks anyone having sex in a dorm room is disrepectful (ORLY?). . . or something. Not that she doens't have sex, oh no. It's just that she's respectful about it. YA RLY.
Rest of community points and laughs. SRSLY.
http://community.livejournal.com/bad_sex/2706615.html?thread=55171511#t55171511
(79 comments |comment on this)
|
8:49p - LJ sponsors wank. Film at eleven.
Originally posted in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif) clairvoyantwank, it's since grown enough to rate a post here.
LJ's Sponsored+ account level goes live.
In addition to the whining that appeared on the very first page and the BOYCOTT!!!! that ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) ladybirdsleeps brought to our attention, there's...
...let's see how many people can bitch about this being the worse idea ever. Like you're being forced to participate.
i don't like the ads. it just makes my journal lose the private feel. the extra features are enticing, but the ad just makes me not want to get involved
I'll be curious to see the social structure of various LJ groups shift, and whether Free and Paid/Perm users exert social pressure on Potential "Sponsored" users to step away from the extra account features. I'm predicting that among some groups, they will.
The inevitable MySpace comparison. Collect them all!
Wah! Sponsored users are getting everything paid users are! I want my money back!
It's all a conspiracy to get more people to buy paid accounts!
I'm so disappointed that LJ is giving in to advertissements. What's next? LJ's integrity has totally gone down the drain.
I could keep going, but it's LJ wank folks. Wank about a new account level. This one's like the Energizer bunny. Pick a page of comments and point and laugh at the whining.
(83 comments |comment on this)
|
10:52p - Soap drama (of the non-opera kind)
It was only a matter of time before we heard from thebitingfaery again, I suppose.
shadowkate posts a rather amusing entry in mock_the_stupid. All is good and fine and cinnamonbite comments to share her amusement and impart some interesting info on how real soap is made:
I hear about that all the time, LOL! Soap makers with their samples at fairs and people eat the damn samples.
Just for reference, don't be fooled by the natural ingredients ploy. We say that because legally, soap, according to the FDA, can only be made from alkali and fats (those things in the grocery stores are DETERGENT bars and not allowed to call themselves soap. Look at the label. Beauty bars, bath bars, but not soap). So since soap, real soap, IS made from more or less natural ingredients (not organic, there's no such thing as a lye tree so no soap is organic. Don't EVER be tricked by that) we say it's natural.
But unless the scent is made from essential oils, none of the scents are natural at all. We all get them from the same places online. They're fragrance oils, not essential oils.
And you might want to check their colors too. Some people splurge and use the micas and others use melted Crayola crayons so don't get too carried away with the word, "natural."
thebitingfaery interjects (and seems to have not fully read the comment she had just replied to): Not all soaps are made from lye.
mslaynie begs to differ: Actually, yes. To be soap, a fat and lye are combined, and through the process of saponification, soap is created.
thebitingfaery keeps missing the point
Finally, dindin makes a comment summarizing the drama quite nicely.
Rather small, yet rather tasty (quite unlike soap . . .)
(77 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|