|
|
Saturday, April 29th, 2006
|
3:01a - "REMOVE that shit"
Over on ohnotheydidnt, nazonatte69 posted images of a porn star who has recently gotten a recording contract - or something like that.
Nazonatte69 thinks she's pretty hot, but this is ohnotheydidnt, and you can't post naked pictures there without dozens of members stampeding to say how gross they are, especially if they contain - oh noes - saggy beef curtains.
Cue seven pages of wank, including: mangosadness: YUCK! Usually when girls take nude pics, their va-jay-jay lips are not all hangin' out. Blahh.
christinemozart: they ususally photoshop it out or have it surgically removed, like the p0rn stars
mangosadness (I suspect she hasn't even seen her OWN vagina): well REMOVE that shit! Special bonus: The pics that everyone is talking about have maxed out their bandwidth, so you can't see them.
NOT SAFE FOR WORK, OBVIOUSLY
current mood: what?
current music: Madredeus - O Mar (74 comments |comment on this)
|
5:15p - Beware the CAPSLOCK OF RAGE!!!one!!eleventy
Ok, so over at YouThink.com, Silver wants to know WHY DO FEMALE PERVERTS GET TO STAY UNBANNED ON THIS WEBSITE?
19 pages long and still going.
For the tl;dr people:
Apparently an 23 year girl YTer posted pics kissing a 16 year old boy she met at the site. It's a bannable offense for anyone over 18 to solicit anyone under 18. I'm not sure if the girl in question has been banned yet or not, but Silver must know WHY THERE ARE DOUBLE STANDARDS AT YT! Etc etc.
current mood: O.O
current music: See Me Feel Me/Listening To You - Roger Daltrey (10 comments |comment on this)
|
6:04p
![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) cf_hardcore is frequently home to some unpopular rants. Mostly though, the folks in cf_hardcore agree with one another. Well, this time foulmouthedb posts a rant that even the hardcore find appalling. It's little, but really quite amusing.
ETA: symbeline is spooging all over my thread. Anybody got a mop?
(170 comments |comment on this)
|
9:45p - OH NerOOOOOEZ
OK, so. This wank is on a fancomm, but it's about history (and a ruler!), so I'm sticking it here.
While on a Dogma-related fact-finding mission worth - literally - hundreds of pennies, I discovered that agnetha posted a picture of her friend's educational ruler to the ar_daily community, meaning to point out a passing resemblance between Trajan and Alan Rickman. Incidentally, the other emperors pictured on this ruler are Augustus and Nero.
Decivitatedei takes offense at Nero's presence on the ruler (while confusing an Alan Rickman fan community with either an academic journal or the ruler manufacturer):
Yeah I kinda see it. HOWEVER, as a student who is focusing on Roman History...NO NO.
Augustus and then NERO?! Why Nero? What about Tiberius who lived much longer and was his direct grandson? Who had so many achievements and such a controversial reign? Geeeez.
At this point, the ruler's actual owner, tonibunny, steps in to defend her ruler's honor:
It's a ruler aimed at kiddies, not students of Roman History, and has facts that would be interesting to kiddies on the back - ie this is Augustus who was the first emperor, this is Nero burned Rome, etc. Tiberius is fascinating, but perhaps not that interesting to an 8 year old. Even so, as a graduate with a classics degree, I think my ruler rocks :)
AWESOME. Dueling classicists!
The duel carries on for a few more posts, until decivitatedei ( parries herself to death... )
Alrighty then.
Then tonibunny whacks decivitatedei over the head with the clue-by-four:
So, what event from Tiberius' reign would you put on the ruler...?
It's small, but fresh! Could get bigger!
In other news, Rickman fangirls are still scary as hell.
current mood: Holier-than-thou
current music: Cooler-than-thine (115 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|