Wank - Not Just for Fandom Anymore!

> recent entries
> calendar
> friends
> profile

Wednesday, January 10th, 2007
9:51a - Hi-ho!
Smallish update on the wank that keeps on neighing -- er, giving:

Ohnoes! LJ Abuse has demanded we delete [info]callmesilver's post about our intolerance!

Comm members hurry to make screencaps, debate copyright, and generally dogpile on [info]callmesilver. Good times.

(211 comments |comment on this)

5:28p

Over at the libertarianism community on ElJay, [info]lefthandedninja asks, "Do you think possessing child pornography should be a crime?"  in reaction to this article.  (Apparently, instead of turning in his final exam, some dumbass turned in a CD full of child porn.)

Fantastic.

[info]kadeshaderow gets things started off the right way by asking, "Are you fucking retarded?" and then continues to splooge all over the place.  (Now with bolding and underlining action!) 

The wank then moves on to whether or not the age of consent is arbitrary, and whether that even pertains to the subject at hand since the CD turned in contained pictures of very young children.

[info]vox_soli feels the need to tl;dr to the max about how she is an anarchist and actually SAYS, "I more or less think that it's okay as long as the child in question has a sufficiently mature understanding of the whole idea of sexuality to consent and there isn't any question of coercion or undue influence from an authority figure."   She, [info]cyclotron, and [info]ragnarok20 go on to have a nice healthy debate over whether or not you can define a law if you don't actually believe in laws.

But!  [info]ragnarok20 simply cannot take this lying down!  Instead of replying on the first post, he has to make a whole new post about how big of an idiot [info]kadeshaderow is.

Thankfully, this post looks semi splooge-free at the moment, but the second the usual suspects show up, it'll explode, mark my words. 

(309 comments |comment on this)


<< previous day [calendar] next day >>

> top of page
JournalFen