(Post a new comment)

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-11 06:30 am UTC (link)
	Thanks comrade! I do indeed lack an account. -Wank Ninja (Reply to this)(Thread)

	blackjackrocket 2005-02-11 07:19 am UTC (link)
	Yeah...keep trying! They're bound to open it again sometime soon! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	snacky 2005-02-11 04:00 pm UTC (link)
	Could it be that Wank Ninja lacks an account because s/he's a minor? I mean, seeing as s/he's in high school and all. Yes, I do realize Wank Ninja could be an 18 year senior in high school. But just another common sense reminder from your friendly neighborhood snackcake. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	sepiamagpie 2005-02-11 06:54 am UTC (link)
	okay. We don't wank minors. This is a community for a high school. Some math, please. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	gal_montag 2005-02-11 07:04 am UTC (link)
	Actually, can we get some clarity on that? I was under the impression that communities are fair game. (Although this being a community of minors by definition...) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	sepiamagpie 2005-02-11 07:34 am UTC (link)
	I think we ended it on 'have some common sense'. Especially if it's really obvious it's minors. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	sorchar 2005-02-11 07:51 am UTC (link)
	No minors. Mainly because they can't get JFs and ergo can't defend themselves. (Reply to this)(Parent)

snacky
2005-02-11 04:27 pm UTC (link)

I was under the impression that communities are fair game.

I think communities are fair game in the sense that, if the people being wanked are not readily identifiable as minors - say, a fandom community, or a pet lovers community. If the poster identifies themself in some way as a minor, like "OMG I'M 15 and I LURVE JOHNNY DEPP THE MOSTEST!" then common sense dictates you don't wank them, even if it's in a comm.

(Although this being a community of minors by definition...)

Exactly. I'd guess that the majority of members of a community of high school students are minors. Again, use common sense.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	megmurry 2005-02-11 07:32 am UTC (link)
	If most of the people posting graduated last year, as the post says, that would put them well into the 18-19 bracket. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	sepiamagpie 2005-02-11 07:37 am UTC (link)
	op's a minor. It follows that a good deal of the others are too. And if they aren't, by god they look like they're five in some of those pictures. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	snacky 2005-02-11 04:23 pm UTC (link)
	I looked at the community user info, and the user info for the members. Out of 118 members, 41 are identifiable as minors, and 16 are over 18. The other 61 had no birth year listed in their user info, but since it's a community for a high school, I'm guessing the majority are under 18. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	o_O hugsnkisses 2005-02-11 06:20 pm UTC (link)
	You went to every userinfo? Snacks, that's quite a bit of sleuthing there. Uh, have a shiny gold mod star or summit. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: o_O

snacky
2005-02-11 06:32 pm UTC (link)

I know, too much time on my hands, right? Of course, it was a fairly small community. *g*

But I figured if I didn't actually check, someone would make the argument (as they do above) that it's probably people 18+. Also, since people don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of "common sense" (like not wanking a comm of high school students since most of them are likely minors = common sense), I thought actual facts might help.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	miome 2005-02-11 08:11 pm UTC (link)
	Wank in a highschool? Shock and horror! How'd that happen? Why the hell is F_W picking on minors today? Are HP BNFs not whiny and immature enough anymore? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	erototoxin 2005-02-12 01:08 am UTC (link)
	Yes, I seem to recall that wank is pretty much what high school is - so there's no point reporting it. It's like reporting that there's water at the bottom of the sea. (Reply to this)(Parent)