Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



A Guy Named Goo ([info]the_clansmen) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-02-22 20:00:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"Wow, it's a slow wank day," I said to myself. "There has to be wank somewhere."

Then I said, "And it's probably on the [info]feminist community.

And lo, I was right. Today, the feminists tackle the question "If a girl consents to sex but she thinks she's having sex with someone else, is it rape?"


(Post a new comment)


[info]iczer6
2005-02-23 04:24 am UTC (link)
...

Is it just me or does that comm seem to spend a great amount of time deciding what counts as rape?

Not every regrettable sex act is rape.

I just have to say WORD to that. [Not that what he did wasn't shitty though.]

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]the_clansmen
2005-02-23 04:32 am UTC (link)
I suppose it's an important (and wanky) question.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gorogoro
2005-02-23 05:00 am UTC (link)
Is it just me or does that comm seem to spend a great amount of time deciding what counts as rape?

No kidding. Talk about overthinking a subject.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lurker32
2005-02-23 05:11 am UTC (link)
And here they could save so much time by just asking Ginmar.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]miss_kitten, 2005-02-23 06:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2005-02-23 08:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-02-23 08:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_linnet, 2005-02-23 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2005-02-23 08:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2005-02-23 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2005-02-23 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-02-23 11:40 am UTC
Borat! - [info]dwarfjen, 2005-02-23 05:43 pm UTC
Re: Borat! - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-02-23 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2005-02-24 02:32 am UTC

[info]beandelphiki
2005-02-23 08:03 am UTC (link)
Is it just me or does that comm seem to spend a great amount of time deciding what counts as rape?

YES.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]marlo
2005-02-23 06:57 pm UTC (link)
I KNOW! Who cares? It's just a word. The point is that the guy was a total asshole to the girl. Whether or not it was Rape, it's still disgusting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ahiru
2005-02-23 09:57 pm UTC (link)
Is it just me or does that comm seem to spend a great amount of time deciding what counts as rape?

It's really a very silly thing for them to argue about. After all, if they'd spent any length of time online they'd know that the answer is "everything."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gal_montag
2005-02-23 04:47 am UTC (link)
The woman involved obviously didn't think she was raped.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]oulangi
2005-02-23 06:35 am UTC (link)
I wonder if she'd think that if she knew she hadn't slept with the person she thought she had?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-02-23 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-23 06:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-02-23 07:39 am UTC

[info]kuribos_shoe
2005-02-23 04:58 am UTC (link)
Well, that's one thing to debate.

But I think an even more question is "If two trains, one carrying the Dalai Lama, and the other carrying Hitler and 99 other people , are about to collide, and they end up hitting each other because the brain in a vat that was controlling the trains was busy having sex with a girl who will grow up to cure cancer, is it rape?"

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]the_clansmen
2005-02-23 05:02 am UTC (link)
Yes, but only if the brain was in a closed vat.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]siobhania
2005-02-23 05:28 am UTC (link)
That depends. Was there a walrus? And what kind of cancer? 'Cause if it was pancreatic cancer, then oh man does the Dalai Lama have a lawsuit commin'.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chash
2005-02-23 05:50 am UTC (link)
I very much enjoy your icon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]darkerthanpale
2005-02-23 11:02 am UTC (link)
Surely it depends on the decision of the woman who had a dying concert violinist strapped to her against her will?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]blue_linnet, 2005-02-24 01:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-02-24 03:20 am UTC

[info]electricchick
2005-02-25 11:54 pm UTC (link)
I'm not sure. Were the train tracks made out of tent pegs? Was the liquid in the vat green? How many cars can you see from your window?

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]siobhania
2005-02-23 05:56 am UTC (link)
That's true on the U. Penn campus as well. Don't know whether it's a state/national/university or whatever law, but we got told that at the beginning of the year when we were handed our rape whistles.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chash, 2005-02-23 06:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-02-23 06:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2005-02-23 06:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]siobhania, 2005-02-23 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2005-02-23 06:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]siobhania, 2005-02-23 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-23 06:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2005-02-23 07:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-23 07:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2005-02-23 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-23 07:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2005-02-23 07:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2005-02-23 07:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-02-23 07:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2005-02-23 12:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-02-23 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-02-23 06:47 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-02-23 07:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]megmurry, 2005-02-23 06:57 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]beandelphiki, 2005-02-23 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2005-02-23 10:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beandelphiki, 2005-02-24 09:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-02-23 02:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beandelphiki, 2005-02-24 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cpip, 2005-02-23 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-24 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2005-02-23 07:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2005-02-23 07:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-02-23 09:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-02-23 11:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2005-02-23 11:51 am UTC

[info]sarajayechan
2005-02-23 07:25 am UTC (link)
Those wacky feminists. Always good for a laugh!

However, I also feel for the sane feminists whose name these rabid feminists are spoiling.

(Reply to this)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-02-23 07:45 am UTC (link)
Man, the web is in some kind of rape-wankdiscussion fad. I think someone put something in the water.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-23 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-02-23 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]northatlantic, 2005-02-26 01:47 am UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2005-02-23 08:19 am UTC (link)
The "It wasn't rape because she's a starfucker" argument is a thing of beauty. We live in such enlightened times...

(Reply to this)


[info]prettyveela
2005-02-23 10:45 am UTC (link)
so his real life personality makes his uncle jesse character look enlightened in comparison. have mercy.

Ok I laughed out loud at that. Between that and "You got it dude!" I almost lost my mind in the 90's.

Kimmy Gibber/Danny Tanner=OTP!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-02-23 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-24 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-24 02:23 am UTC
Snark Alert
redwarrior
2005-02-23 10:50 pm UTC (link)
Well, you know, any sex act that involves a penis or a penis-shaped object, unless said penis or penis-shaped object so happens to belong to a lesbian feminist (and it's up for dispute who's a lesbian and who's a feminist, 'cause MtF's used to have penises, and some women who sleep with other women don't have the right ideology) is OMG RAPE!!1!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Snark Alert - [info]greenling, 2005-02-24 05:59 am UTC
Re: Snark Alert - [info]pipssister, 2005-02-25 05:27 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-24 02:36 am UTC (link)
You posted this wank without even mentioning ohbytheway it's about John Stamos, the hottest man alive?

I was going to be all haha, those wacky <lj user="feminist"s, and then I was all, er, the opposite of tl;dr 'cos I was bored, and then I was all HAHAOMGPUDDLE JOHN STAMOS.

(Reply to this)


[info]teratologist
2005-02-24 05:33 am UTC (link)
Well, if it's fraud when a doctor shoots a woman up with the wrong semen in a clinical setting, I'd say that the same thing should apply in the absence of a turkey baster.

There, now we have a compromise. Is everyone happy?

(Reply to this)


[info]mathilde
2005-02-25 05:42 pm UTC (link)
Well, at least she was saved from having sex with John Stamos.
*shudder*

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map