Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



The Brat Queen ([info]thebratqueen) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-03-28 01:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Mildly Amused

food_wank
Proving that knitters aren't the only hobbyists who can bring the splooge, we now have a-rumblin' and a-wankin' going on in the food_porn community, a place normally dedicated to people chatting away about whatever yummy things they've been eating or cooking.

It would seem that someone, very possibly [info]delko, posted an overlarge pic to the community sans cut tag. Said post has been bahleeted as far as I can tell, but it does prompt the moderator to create a new rule that "All pictures larger than 400X600 need to be behind a cut."

[info]c0nsumer is not happy with this, because tiny pictures make Ramen Noodles look like ass nachos. (Note that you're not going to want to click the second link in his post. Just... trust me.) Ever eager to follow the rules, though, he posts a series of pictures with no lj-cut because passive-agressive immaturity always wins the mod never said anything about having to put multiple pics behind a cut. And if you don't like it you clearly hate the handicapped.

You'd think the last bit would be the winner for which part of this wank creates a new [info]jurisimprudence rule, but the award for that goes to [info]delko who declares getting a degree in Interactive Multimedia means never having to use a cut-tag.

Bon wankapetit!



(Post a new comment)


[info]tianxiaode
2005-03-28 08:01 am UTC (link)
I thought it was this post that started the wank:

http://www.livejournal.com/community/food_porn/1117292.html

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lyricalsoul
2005-03-28 08:05 am UTC (link)
It was. And the "salad-in-a-bed-pan" comment is still cracking me up hours later.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tianxiaode
2005-03-28 08:12 am UTC (link)
but it is!

seriously. make a pretty salad. isnt' that what food porn is about? carrots and arugula may be good, but not that interesting.

now, slug, OTOH...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lyricalsoul
2005-03-28 08:23 am UTC (link)
Ew, slug... and the nacho cheese in the crack thing. Thanks for being a total asshat, dude.

I think the mod is going to have to be very specific on this issue, because Mr. C0nsumer is going to nitpick and go with the "I've chosen not to" defense until someone holds him down and tatoos the instructions for an LJ-cut on the inside of his eyelids.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tianxiaode
2005-03-28 08:56 am UTC (link)
can i volunteer?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lyricalsoul
2005-03-28 09:05 am UTC (link)
Uh... see that long line of people stretched across a mile of rugged terrain?

Go to the end.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]smo
2005-03-28 05:32 pm UTC (link)
Or, the mod could just ban his ass. That's what I'd do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]thebratqueen
2005-03-28 05:04 pm UTC (link)
Entirely possible. I came late to the party so the pic had already been resized and [info]delko seemed to be claiming credit for the kerfuffle.

What we need is a forensics team! CSI: Wankery!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rinoared
2005-03-28 10:08 am UTC (link)
[info]delko, please step away from the ellipsis. I repeat, please step away from the ellipsis.

/eternal ellipsis overuse h8r

(Reply to this)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-03-28 12:57 pm UTC (link)
Ass nachos > all.

(Reply to this)


[info]mathilde
2005-03-28 04:01 pm UTC (link)
Man! You beat me to it. It was actually consumer who posted the too-big picture - he resized it by 80 pixels so the picture of his dishtub full of salad could stay on everyone's friends pages. Because GODS FORBID we don't get to see every single dishtub full of salad he ever makes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]thebratqueen
2005-03-28 05:08 pm UTC (link)
Well you know, salads with greens, carrots, and tomatoes in them are so unique you really need to get every detail.

I suppose you have to give him some wanky credit for the fact that every time somebody asked him to use a cut tag he would do far more work to prove that he wasn't messing up their friends' page than ever would have been required to just put the cut tag in, or to resize the pic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mathilde
2005-03-28 05:18 pm UTC (link)
Maybe he didn't get all the slugs and his dinner went awry, and he was taking it out on the world?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]morganya
2005-03-28 04:24 pm UTC (link)
Hey, I'll have you know that clicking a cut-tag is deeply traumatic for me; I just about had an episode when I clicked this one. I need to have my Friends page shot to hell because of oversized pictures of slug-infested salad! Humph. Why does no one pay attention to meeee?

That was one really unappetizing-looking salad.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mathilde
2005-03-28 05:16 pm UTC (link)
You know, the first thing I think of when I find slugs in the vegetables I'll be serving guests is to post it on the internet, too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]smo
2005-03-28 05:31 pm UTC (link)
If there isn't a jurisimprudence law about invoking the handicapped, there needs to be.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 09:17 pm UTC (link)
Oh, yay. Starcat_jewel finally popped in to call someone an entitlement whore. (http://www.livejournal.com/community/food_porn/1118871.html?thread=10281623#t10281623) I was beginning to feel as though the wank was incomplete.

Honestly. Does she just wander around LJ communities looking for an argument so that she can toss out that little zinger?

*need a "You keep using that word. I do not think you know what it means" icon*

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 11:18 pm UTC (link)
But wait! There's more!

Here (http://www.livejournal.com/community/food_porn/1118871.html?style=mine#comments) (shut up, yes, I'm making you click) somebody has changed the original pictures to something rather goatse-like that you Just Don't Want To See.

This provides a rather interesting effect in the comments, since at first the pictures showed up fine, and people commented saying "Nice, delicious pictures," "I'd eat that," "Wow, that looks awesome," "I'd sure like to try some of that," and so on. It is actually kind of comedy gold, but we don't want to encourage him, so I'm going on record as saying it is Not Funny At All.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]thebratqueen
2005-03-28 11:46 pm UTC (link)
You gotta give the guy credit for going the extra wanking mile.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-29 04:09 am UTC (link)
No! No credit at all!

however, it is pretty hilarious

Come on, OP, let's update the post and get wankier!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Easter wank
(Anonymous)
2005-03-29 12:21 am UTC (link)
http://www.livejournal.com/users/cyperian/54505.html

(Reply to this)


[info]sarajayechan
2005-03-29 06:29 pm UTC (link)
Ever eager to follow the rules, though, he posts a series of pictures with no lj-cut because passive-agressive immaturity always wins the mod never said anything about having to put multiple pics behind a cut. And if you don't like it you clearly hate the handicapped.

That was baleeted~

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map