|
|
Voip (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} banal_o_rama) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank,@ 2003-10-17 22:37:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
More fat activist wank:
Because they are very, very amusing.
Yahoo posts picture of a fat woman coming out of a cookie store. Impotent rage splurts all over my monitor. World in harmony again.
That's horrific. I wonder how long they had to wait before a fat woman came out?
I'm guessing they sat through a long line of thin people to get that shot.
I'm sure the photographer spent hours praying futilely that the one obese cookie-eater in the city would drop by that day. I mean, it's the only logical explanation for this atrocity. And stuff.
I am bloody sick of the distorted lips/eating watermelon in the briar patch from news organizations.
...come again?
Of course the photographer is following directions, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't harass the photographer. Somebody following directions is still responsible, and the tactic of harassing the harasser relies on making people think twice before they just do what's convenient the next time. Ideally, it should be in someone's long term career interest not to do this kind of work.
MEIN FUHRER, I HAVE THE ACCOMPANIMENT TO YOUR HUMAN-INTEREST PIECE. IT IS A FINE ARYAN PUPPY OF THE PROPER WEIGHT AND COLORATION. I BELIEVE HIS NAME IS "SPRITZEL".
However, just as jews eat just about as many babies as gentiles, fat people eat about the same number of cookies as thin people.
1. Fat people do in fact eat more cookies. They just think they don't.
2. Bitch, please.
Their major beef with the picture is that it cuts off the woman's face, thereby dehumanizing her and sending the message that fat people are inhuman. Oddly enough, no one has objected to this image, which by that logic would suggest that medical technicians are both subhuman and blurry. But, y'know, if they do that they can't evoke the Nuremburg trials, now can they?
Life is so much better when you get to use Godwin's Law before breakfast.
Because they are very, very amusing.
Yahoo posts picture of a fat woman coming out of a cookie store. Impotent rage splurts all over my monitor. World in harmony again.
That's horrific. I wonder how long they had to wait before a fat woman came out?
I'm guessing they sat through a long line of thin people to get that shot.
I'm sure the photographer spent hours praying futilely that the one obese cookie-eater in the city would drop by that day. I mean, it's the only logical explanation for this atrocity. And stuff.
I am bloody sick of the distorted lips/eating watermelon in the briar patch from news organizations.
...come again?
Of course the photographer is following directions, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't harass the photographer. Somebody following directions is still responsible, and the tactic of harassing the harasser relies on making people think twice before they just do what's convenient the next time. Ideally, it should be in someone's long term career interest not to do this kind of work.
MEIN FUHRER, I HAVE THE ACCOMPANIMENT TO YOUR HUMAN-INTEREST PIECE. IT IS A FINE ARYAN PUPPY OF THE PROPER WEIGHT AND COLORATION. I BELIEVE HIS NAME IS "SPRITZEL".
However, just as jews eat just about as many babies as gentiles, fat people eat about the same number of cookies as thin people.
1. Fat people do in fact eat more cookies. They just think they don't.
2. Bitch, please.
Their major beef with the picture is that it cuts off the woman's face, thereby dehumanizing her and sending the message that fat people are inhuman. Oddly enough, no one has objected to this image, which by that logic would suggest that medical technicians are both subhuman and blurry. But, y'know, if they do that they can't evoke the Nuremburg trials, now can they?
Life is so much better when you get to use Godwin's Law before breakfast.
Post a comment in response:
