Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



LuLuLuLu ([info]lulinda) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-05-18 22:22:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I'm sure some of you remember this recent post to oft_wank linking a thread on eGullet about an avant-garde restaurant in Chicago which is very thoroughly reviewed by a diner.

http://www.journalfen.net/community/otf_wank/252482.html

As a supremely amusing follow-up, here's a very funny thread complete with pictures from Mouthfulsfood.com having a bit of fun with the whole avant-garde food concept:

http://www.mouthfulsfood.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=4779

Inspired by some of the important new developments in the world of gastronomy, I have decided to try my hand at a few molecular style dishes of my own. I hope the good people of Mouthfuls will indulge this bit of exploration on my part.

My first is simply “toast.” Here, I have hung a piece of whole wheat toast from a clothesline:

The gentle breezes of my local terroir imbue the porous crust with scents of the Pacific Northwest. How does this make you feel? Does it make you think anew?

I intend to serve this at a height (individually tailored) so that the “toast” is just out of reach of the diner’s mouth—with a simple instruction to “Jump!” There are approximately 4 bites to this course, though individuals may have to jump more than 4 times.

The whole wheat toast is buttered. (Salted butter, in this case.) Also, I have used a fishing hook to attach the whole wheat toast to the clothesline. I hope this gives a sense of edginess, and even daring-do to the dish. As you can see, I would like to serve this course “outside.” Perhaps this will be a metaphor that I can extend later on as I develop further courses, centering on a journey from outside to inside.


(Mouthfulsfood.com has a different tone from eGullet. I suspect it was started by former posters to eGullet who didn't like the atmosphere of the place (note: pure speculation on my part, I have no idea if Mouthfuls postdates eGullet or what). I suppose you could say they're a bit like the fandom_wank of food, er, fandom, for want of a better term.)


(Post a new comment)


[info]didodiva
2005-05-19 04:36 am UTC (link)
That whole thread is hilarious. There's a fine line between making food pretty by artfully swirling cream into coffee and putting garnishes on plates and that overpriced, completely unappitizing junk from the first wank. Didn't people originally make food look artistic to make to more appealing to eat?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]wankismyfandom
2005-05-19 06:09 am UTC (link)
Hell yes. My favourite is the John Cage homage.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]princessdot
2005-05-19 07:28 am UTC (link)
oft_wank

Hey, a new comm in the making! I like it =D

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]random_dent
2005-05-19 05:28 pm UTC (link)
Shakespearing offshoot? "Oft Wank'd, n'er O'erlooked"?
Featuring only those wanks which are so wanky that they occur entirely in iambic pentameter.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]crickets
2005-05-19 07:45 am UTC (link)
The fishooks make it. ;) I liked both John Cage refs. And mud pies!

(Reply to this)


[info]random_dent
2005-05-19 05:26 pm UTC (link)
That's just fantastic.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map