Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Who knew Armageddon could be so barbecue-tasty ([info]mistressrenet) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-05-24 21:47:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Bitch Slapped
Current music:House

Being pro-life means...well, we're not entirely sure.
You can't go to Planned Parenthood and be pro-life! I don't care if you might get cervical cancer or if it actually costs Planned Parenthood money to give you care!"

Really, this wank speaks for itself. Good times for everyone!

Thanks to a [info]wank_report mouse. Edited because I shouldn't post at bedtime.


(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-05-25 03:01 am UTC (link)
Gah. Freaking self-righteous pro-lifers.

(Reply to this)


[info]nevadafighter
2005-05-25 03:25 am UTC (link)
Wow. That godisprolife is ten thousand flavors of stupid . . .

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]wankismyfandom
2005-05-25 06:04 am UTC (link)
Yeah. I love how he wanks all over the place about the sanctity of human life and then insists that other humans should ignore serious medical conditions if PP is the only place they can go for treatment.

Pro-lifers seem to quit caring so much about human life as soon as it leaves the womb.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2005-05-25 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 12:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-25 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2005-05-26 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-26 09:50 am UTC

[info]splorch
2005-05-25 03:29 am UTC (link)
"...but I guess I don't matter because I'm not carrying an unborn child."

tinypixie wins teh internets!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mistressrenet
2005-05-25 12:08 pm UTC (link)
I liked whoever it was who was trying to get godisprolife to pony up for tinypixie's medical care too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-26 02:30 am UTC

[info]kijikun
2005-05-25 03:55 am UTC (link)
Wait..wait...doesn't Planned Parenthood give out you know condoms and birth control pills you know for free?

Isn't that a good thing?

/wank

(Reply to this)(Thread)

OMG NO! - [info]xturtle, 2005-05-25 04:15 am UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]xero_sky, 2005-05-25 05:18 am UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]tetsuki, 2005-05-25 05:44 am UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]goldberry, 2005-05-25 06:49 am UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]tetsuki, 2005-05-25 10:04 am UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-25 10:18 am UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]goldberry, 2005-05-25 05:10 pm UTC
Re: OMG NO! - [info]visp, 2005-05-26 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]airawyn, 2005-05-25 07:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2005-05-25 09:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2005-05-26 12:44 am UTC

[info]lurker32
2005-05-25 04:08 am UTC (link)
Might wanna edit that first line to "and be pro-life", just to clear things up for those of us who are dumb like me up past their bedtime. ;)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 12:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2005-05-25 02:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 03:07 pm UTC

[info]atalantapendrag
2005-05-25 04:31 am UTC (link)
..."sheisty"?

(Reply to this)


[info]aerobot
2005-05-25 07:06 am UTC (link)
Pro-lifers: Always liking to dictate to other people what to do with their lives for the sake of their personal ideals.

Especially if it will never happen to them.

(Reply to this)


[info]rogue
2005-05-25 07:26 am UTC (link)
WHY ISN'T GODISPROLIFE A TROLL?

CAPSLOCK OF HEAT EXPLODEY.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2005-05-25 07:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harpie84, 2005-05-25 06:29 pm UTC

[info]aerobot
2005-05-25 07:39 am UTC (link)
Oh my god why did I read that whole post. MY HEAD IS GOING TO EXPLODE.

EYAAARRGGGHHH.

GGRRRR.

ARGH.

Just tell women to get into the kitchen why don't you?! ARRGGHH.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 12:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-25 12:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypercubed, 2005-05-25 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 07:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypercubed, 2005-05-25 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-05-26 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-26 09:53 am UTC

[info]teapotgirl
2005-05-25 08:00 am UTC (link)
*head desk*
I won't even touch twirlandswirl's comments.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-25 10:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teapotgirl, 2005-05-25 04:46 pm UTC

[info]twocorpses
2005-05-25 08:25 am UTC (link)
I really don't know why I decided to read the whole thing. misplacedmind and um.. two others whose names start with m are like the only sane people there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-25 11:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 12:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twocorpses, 2005-05-25 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-25 10:46 pm UTC

[info]bishounenhuntrs
2005-05-25 12:39 pm UTC (link)
This is a whole bunch of men trying to tell the ladies on that comm what they should do with their bodies, isn't it?

My late grandfather always said the men had no place in telling women what to do with their bodies. If a man who grew up before WW2 knew this, why in the hell do guys from this day and age not?*


*Grandpa grew up in a time where women died in childbirth a lot more often then they do now.
It's kind of hard to think you have any right to stick your nose in when they're the ones risking their life, when for you it's no risk at all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]julia, 2005-05-25 02:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]walkingundine, 2005-05-25 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cat_mcdougall, 2005-05-25 05:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-25 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2005-05-25 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-05-26 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-26 09:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]madelfdisease, 2005-05-27 08:40 pm UTC

[info]cat_mcdougall
2005-05-25 06:01 pm UTC (link)
The one thing I have to ask is this:

Birth control is evil? So..... they're not going to complain if people who use Planned Parenthood for birth control suddenly stop and become welfare recepients to take care of all the kids they have? Right. It is a logical assumption. And I'm talking the married couples who do this. Because single parenting is a whole 'nother kettle of fish.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-25 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypercubed, 2005-05-25 07:52 pm UTC
We're all going to Hell!! - [info]windex_junkie, 2005-05-25 08:49 pm UTC
Re: We're all going to Hell!! - [info]cheshireempress, 2005-05-26 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-26 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napoleon, 2005-05-27 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-27 02:07 pm UTC

[info]oxydosic
2005-05-25 10:59 pm UTC (link)
Never mind that not all PPs perform abortions. That's kind of like boycotting Wendy's because someone found a finger in their chili across the country *cough*.

Fetuses - they're like severed fingers in a way.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2005-05-26 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fschwak, 2005-05-26 07:28 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-05-26 01:15 am UTC (link)
Wandering pro-choice member of abortiondebate here: welcome to the hell that is dealing with godisprolife.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2005-05-26 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2005-05-26 10:13 am UTC

[info]annaham
2005-05-26 01:40 am UTC (link)
I think my brain just deflated from reading godisprolife's comments. Hooo boy.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-05-26 01:45 am UTC (link)
some sort of spooging going on in the Anti-Vegan comm
http://www.livejournal.com/community/anti_vegan/526568.html

(Reply to this)


[info]faultypremise
2005-05-26 02:26 am UTC (link)
Ah. Godisprolife. He's been a thorn in the side of pro-choicers for awhile now, on the abortiondebate comm as well as various others. It is his self appointed mission in life to rid the world of abortion at all costs.

Including the cost of women's lives, apparently.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sitt_isis, 2005-05-26 03:33 am UTC

[info]chaimonkey
2005-05-26 04:35 am UTC (link)
Planned Parenthood condoms consistently rank worst, bursting at the first level of testing - being filled with air.

Read, read, and read some more!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-26 01:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]teratologist, 2005-05-26 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-05-30 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2005-05-31 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2005-05-31 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2005-05-31 05:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-31 03:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2005-05-31 03:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]michmatch, 2005-06-03 11:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2005-06-03 04:28 pm UTC

[info]loony666
2005-05-26 05:01 am UTC (link)
The person who said birth control pills are worse than smoking crack while pregnant and kicking puppies needs to STFU and plzdikthx.

Also, can somebody explain to me the point of debating about abortion on the internet? You're not going to change anybody's mind and you're not going to make a difference. So what the hell is the point?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lemone, 2005-05-26 07:27 am UTC

[info]hellespont
2005-05-26 06:15 am UTC (link)
Sweet merciful fuck. I was bowled over by the awfulness of dies_irae's comments, so much that I had to go to his LJ to get some more.* Here's a shredling of the insanity:

His turn-ons include:

motherhood as the epitome of beauty
as a male.
as an artist.
as a lover of objective truth.
Women are the unrivaled most beautiful of all of GOD's creations.
This is the case though of the true women who do not feel the need to deviate from the roles beset by them by their nature.

On body art:

I want to see if I can find a tattoo shop near by Stafford, VA...I really have a lot of problems with all the porn and pagan overtones in the majority of tat shops, I would love to be able to find a shop that is free from that and perhaps even has a couple of Catholic artists.

On lowrise jeans:

But under that that area of skin, that slight lil slope on her tummy is right where the baby will begin growing someday. The reason those jeans are so hot is because they make us men think of that woman being a mother, and appeals to our natural desire to have children with her.

Scariest of all: keeps yourself, your children, and your fertile, fertile uterus away from the twitchy guy at Michael's:

I used to work at Michael's. For a couple weeks I would catch myself thinking time and time again "wow, shes really beautiful" as I would look down from the tall stocking ladders and see these cute young mothers shopping. After a week or two of seeing dozens of gorgeous women with babies in their tummies, or in carriages or a few toddlers en tow. I finally decided that either silly crafts attract beautiful women or that there was simply something about their motherhood that enhanced their beauty so much. Lets just say I dont think its the crafts...

*It's like when you eat a little bit of bad tunafish and you get a tummyache. So you eat some more bad tunafish and you throw up and then you feel better.**

**FWIW, I really don't recommend this as a cure for the common tummyache.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2005-05-26 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruby_tuesday, 2005-05-28 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-05-26 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-26 10:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dwarfjen, 2005-05-27 10:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]madelfdisease, 2005-05-27 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2005-05-28 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-05-30 10:19 pm UTC

[info]fschwak
2005-05-26 07:46 am UTC (link)
Disclaimer: The following is my opinion and by no means intended to make anyone change their mind. ;)

godisprolife and dies_irae need to get the heck off my side. There's a big difference between being pro-life and being anti-abortion. Those two, from their comments, are anti-abortion. They don't care why the woman feels she might need it, they just want to make abortion go away FOREVORZ!!!!!111!one!11 From what I've seen, true pro-lifers look at fixing the problem rather than just taking away whatever solutions don't appeal to them. Anti-abortionists, rather than addressing the problems such as poverty, lack of efficient health care, lack of efficient education concerning STDs and birth control, and the prevalence of rape and/or sexual abuse, which can all contribute to unwanted pregnancies, seem to just focus on stopping abortion in it's tracks. And frankly, that pisses me off. There are always going to be women who, for one reason or another, feel they need an abortion whether it's legal to have one or not. Why not focus on helping fewer women feel they need to have one rather than just take away one of their options? Like I said, those two need to get off my side. They're making the pro-lifers who actually care about women look like asses.

Sorry, that's just one thing that presses my buttons lately. ;) And I totally respect pro-choice folks. I would just prefer that women would choose life, but unfortunately that's not possible for many of them, which is what I think we should work on changing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-05-26 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lessis, 2005-05-26 08:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-26 01:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]goldberry, 2005-05-26 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]airawyn, 2005-05-27 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-05-27 06:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruby_tuesday, 2005-05-28 01:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2005-05-29 11:03 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-05-28 04:25 pm UTC (link)
I'm 'pro-life', too (that includes anti-war and anti-death penalty) but that guy's logic is so wrong that it's funny.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-05-30 10:20 pm UTC

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map