Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Allusion Q. Witticism ([info]kadath) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-08-05 19:41:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:uh-huh.

bad_rpers_suck + furries = wank
[info]a_little_fairy posts some tl;dr about a group of inconsistent moderators, and the argument that ensues about furries, the bannination thereof, and whether or not lizardmen and werecreatures are, in fact, furries.

The moderators in question (I think; the fog of wank is obscuring things), [info]shinything and [info]dayofjudah, show up to defend their honor. Apparently, if it featured in Anita Blake, it's not a furry.

Also, agreeing with Penny Arcade is either cool or not cool. I'm not sure which.

Also also, the inevitable furry isn't about sex! discussion.

[Edited for clarity.]

[Edited again: Post is now locked.]



(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map