Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Altoids Addict ([info]altoidsaddict) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-09-09 19:46:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Nothin' like Childfree to bring the wank...
Over on (of course!) [info]childfree, Lady Lanet posts about a seven million dollar lawsuit against someone who apparently beat the shit out of her at a Wal-Mart a scant few months ago.

My curiosity piqued by why on earth a judge would think a Wal-mart shopper could even count as high as that, must less own said amount, I eagerly awaited some sort of confirmation. None forthcoming yet, but we have a glowing post by Lady Lanet's mother (An aside to my mother: do I have to get beaten up in a Wal-Mart for you to buy me a laptop? Geez! I have a tummyache, make with the electronics!). Other than that, I cannot find the original CF post, and free tits cookies to the first person to find it. Cookies and tits for me! I found it! Faaaaaake!) I understand she was kicked in the back and other such things. And why hasn't a seven million dollar judgment made it into the papers? Well, the family shies away from publicity. So it makes total sense to be posting it on LJ, after all. Maybe the avoidance of publicity is why there's no mention of it in her personal journal.

CF members are, understandably, skeptical.

It wouldn't be a wank without amusing retort pics and a fake journal admitting that Lady Lanet is an attention whore who made the whole thing up.

I'm sure there's more to come, and we won't have to beat the shit out of someone in Misses Sportswear to get it, either.

Grey area: Lady Lanet claims to be fourteen, but it's a community post and her "mother" presumably is not, and I don't buy it for a second anyway. Fourteen-year-olds do not lust after John Edwards (ew, unless it's not the psychic, and anyway it's still strange), and the whole journal just reeks of Kaycee Nicole. I'm not the only one who thinks so. Ruling?

ETA: Awww, punkin went and deleted her post. Screencap in the comments, y'all.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map