Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Eilan ([info]eilan) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-10-01 18:02:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Bayes Law wank
Mini-wank in [info]debate.

[info]raving_wolf posts about random drug testing using statistics that to people not familiar with statistics may seem wrong, but are correct. Bayes Law is not something most people can grasp very easily, so people complain loudly.

Dear people of the world,

testing postitive when something really is negative does not have the same probability as testing negative when something really is positive.

Thanks,
Rebecca

Oh, and it also made it into a [info]_scientists_ thread.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map