Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Gun o' the Pants ([info]gun) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2005-11-15 16:39:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Gizmodo reviews something. I dunno what, but eh. Reviews it negatively.

The creator of said product wanks about it.

Gizmodo wanks back.

Worst synopsis in history of otf_wank.


(Post a new comment)


[info]sarracenia
2005-11-15 05:28 pm UTC (link)
It always gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling when I see the blogs I read reported in otf_wank.

(Reply to this)


[info]issendai
2005-11-15 07:56 pm UTC (link)
Yikes.

Gizmodo: This thingamabobber doesn't look so hot.

Thingamabobber's Inventor: DONT JUDGE ME U DONT KNO ME! Or my thingamabobber! YOU ARE DESTROYING MY LIFE!

Gizmodo: You're right, I don't know you. Let's see what we can find out. *pause* Whoa, there are how many lawsuits for fraud against you?

TI: *sends an email to all the commenters to the effect that the thingamabobber is not released yet and there's a press ban on it*

A commenter: *posts the email, 'cos damn*

Another commenter: If there's a press ban on it, how come it has its own web site right out in public view?

Commenters: *debate whether Gizmodo is mean, whether TI is batshit, and how, exactly, TI plans to make money selling his thingamabobber in China*


Me, I'm just amused that it's possible to declare that there will be no press coverage on something. Isn't that a huge blinking sign that says "HOT STORY HERE, COME AND GET IT"?

(Reply to this)


[info]narcissam
2005-11-15 08:31 pm UTC (link)
Why are the Gizmodo editors stooping to ad hominem? It tells us nothing about the actual merit of the product. No wonder the guy's offended.

Ok, so the fact that the guy's a scam artist has nothing to do with the validity of his product? What world is this poster on?

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map