|
|
token (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} chaimonkey) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank,@ 2005-12-13 00:18:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
mommy, whas racist?
It's admin time onfeminist again, and this time the hot button issue is: racism
335 comments as I type this.
Specifically, reverse racism. (formatting theirs)
princessmerbear respectfully disagrees, and receives a prompt mod note.
99catsaway cries academic-centrism
onewayfreak: obligatory "I'm leaving" comment
clean_circles seyz: words mean what they mean!
(which results in more mod-noting, and therefore more "I'm leaving")
beandelphiki: All you folks disagreeing are racist!
spaztasterastic packs her shit up
x_mass is so banned
Spunk-tastic!
It's admin time on
feminist again, and this time the hot button issue is: racism335 comments as I type this.
Specifically, reverse racism. (formatting theirs)
Reverse racism is not a valid concept: You may not bring up points which imply reverse racism or explicitly say that you believe it to be a real threat. Racism implies powersomething which institutionally whites have, and people of color(POC) do not. Therefore, "reverse racism" does not exist. Prejudice, which is what people often mean when referring to "reverse racism" or "reverse sexism", does exist (see the comments for examples). But it must be noted that this does not in any way hold the same power or significance as racism or sexism. Not even close. Implying that it does is not acceptable.Aaand they're off!
princessmerbear respectfully disagrees, and receives a prompt mod note.99catsaway cries academic-centrismonewayfreak: obligatory "I'm leaving" commentclean_circles seyz: words mean what they mean!(which results in more mod-noting, and therefore more "I'm leaving")
beandelphiki: All you folks disagreeing are racist!spaztasterastic packs her shit upx_mass is so bannedSpunk-tastic!
