Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Jon "Bad Wasabi" Wood ([info]mcity) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-01-20 13:23:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:lol furries

fchan drama doubleheader
Which, come to think of it, is the only real reason I go there.

Some mouse posts a thread asking why there is so much Nazi furry art*.

I just came across this banner http://fchan.hentaiplanet.net/b//src/1135606592102_fchanbnnr2d.png

It got me thinking: why so much Nazi-inspired in furry art? I mean, the Nazis probably would have been putting people in camps for showing sexual attraction to animals or anthromorphs. So why does so much furry art center on Nazi imagery?

There's obviously no backlash in the furry community against artists who focus on Nazis. I wonder about this too. I'm not saying that there "should" be such a backlash, but the very absence of one is peculiar. Is it because furries do not feel they are on the receiving end of racial hatred? Are furries mostly white?


Yeah, it's overflowing with Nazi art. Everywhere you look, that's all you see. Furries not only hate America, they idolize Nazis. They're probably all Liberal Communists, too.

[The above sarcasm close-captioned for the humor impaired]


Someone mentions "Maus". Someone else states that it has to do with GSF #1 and #2. Disney was a Nazi. Nazi furries are basically hipsters. Mod wants you to shut up about Disney. Look, I can use punctuation to imply sarcasm! *Furry tear*. Why is almost all Nazi furry art of men?

*The answer, of course, is that while the Nazis were arguably a xenophobic, racist boil on the planet's rear, they had an excellent sense of style.

Remember that lady who married a dolphin? Yeah, posted on fchan. Someone manages to connect it to the Religious Right[sic] and gay marrage. Mod steps in because someone made a "yo mama" joke. Animals can consent, and the Internet will back me up. Um, no they can't. Tl;dr with no actual point. Since animals want to reproduce, they can consent. We're all bigots! Being Christian-at all-is aiding the fundies. (Personally, I wonder why no one made the comparision between fundies making all Christians look bad, and zoophile furs making all furries look nuts.) And, just before the lock, hypothetical situations that will never happen are invalid.


(Post a new comment)


[info]singe
2006-01-20 08:14 pm UTC (link)
Furries not only hate America, they idolize Nazis. They're probably all Liberal Communists, too.

And vegetarians! *seethes*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]khym_chanur
2006-01-20 09:02 pm UTC (link)
Why do people always forget that the Nazis and Communists hated each other?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amxjm, 2006-01-20 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2006-01-21 12:47 am UTC

[info]singe
2006-01-20 08:15 pm UTC (link)
Also, 'Maus' just about killed me when I read it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]annabelle_lee
2006-01-20 08:33 pm UTC (link)
The post about it or the book itself?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-01-20 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-01-20 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-21 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]b_jellybean, 2006-01-21 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-21 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonpigeon, 2006-01-21 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-01-21 08:08 am UTC

[info]hangingfire
2006-01-20 09:52 pm UTC (link)
There's something mildly brain-breaking about seeing Maus brought up in relation to a debate about Nazi furry art. I mean, I sorta see how that particular poster got to it as an example, but some it's just ... I guess it's just trying to squeeze Maus and furry anything else into the same brainspace just isn't working.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-01-20 09:56 pm UTC

[info]sashenka
2006-01-21 12:12 am UTC (link)
Comparing Maus to anthro!porn is like comparing Shindler's List to a teen romantic comedy. It can be funny, but only if you're me and you haven't slept in a day or two... >_> er...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-01-21 12:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2006-01-21 02:57 am UTC

[info]sisterelwood
2006-01-20 08:18 pm UTC (link)
I got nothing on this except... yikes... That and I just wanted the chance to use this icon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mouseykins
2006-01-20 09:04 pm UTC (link)
Is that a quote from something?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-01-20 09:17 pm UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2006-01-20 08:26 pm UTC (link)
Nazis were arguably a xenophobic, racist boil on the planet's rear

Only "arguably"?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mcity
2006-01-20 08:32 pm UTC (link)
There are several groups of people who use argueably for anything with even the slightest subjectivity. That was a sarcastic comment on them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-01-20 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-20 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-01-20 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-20 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amxjm, 2006-01-20 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-21 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-01-21 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-01-21 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-01-21 05:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-01-21 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-01-21 12:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonpigeon, 2006-01-21 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]michmatch, 2006-01-21 11:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doroc_sabah, 2006-01-22 12:07 am UTC

[info]vigilanterodent
2006-01-20 08:33 pm UTC (link)
Well, you might make a case for them being more of a cancer, really.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-01-20 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-01-20 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-01-20 09:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-20 10:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]atalantapendrag, 2006-01-21 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2006-01-21 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunshou, 2006-01-21 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-21 08:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2006-01-21 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goldberry, 2006-01-22 12:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doroc_sabah, 2006-01-22 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hitchhiker42, 2006-01-21 07:46 am UTC

[info]kannaophelia
2006-01-23 12:54 pm UTC (link)
I'm glad I wasn't the only one to want to ask that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]amxjm
2006-01-20 08:34 pm UTC (link)
Some furry artists are still doing the whole Nazi uniform trend?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mcity
2006-01-20 08:50 pm UTC (link)
Yep. Because Nazis had cool uniforms.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2006-01-20 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2006-01-21 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-01-21 10:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2006-01-22 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenglass, 2006-01-21 01:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-01-21 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-21 05:27 am UTC

[info]carlanime
2006-01-20 08:39 pm UTC (link)
Someone manages to connect it to the Religious Right[sic] and gay marrage.

What the world really needs is a new version of "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon"....

(Reply to this)


[info]beandelphiki
2006-01-20 09:30 pm UTC (link)
Animals are not capable of the same rational thought that we are. They live chiefly on instinct, and therefore cannot make decisions on the same level. It would be like having sex with an autistic or retarded person. And I doubt you're going to say that would be acceptable.

*killing sarcasm* Boy, my highly intelligent autistic friends - some of whom are VERY sexually active - are going to loooove hearing that they're unable to consent because, you know, they're like animals in a way.

WTF. What the hell is it with this autistic = brain-dead and barely human thing I keep seeing?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]doomsday
2006-01-20 09:38 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, if claims are true, many of them are perfectly capable of wanking all over the internet!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]drworm
2006-01-20 09:45 pm UTC (link)
WTF. What the hell is it with this autistic = brain-dead and barely human thing I keep seeing?

Pish-tosh! If they can talk and voice an opinion and perhaps disagree with us, then they are not truly autistic and we can wash our hands of them!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]beandelphiki, 2006-01-20 10:52 pm UTC

[info]hangingfire
2006-01-20 10:02 pm UTC (link)
I have a feeling that some people read lightweight articles about Temple Grandin and drew all the wrong conclusions from her work with animals.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2006-01-20 11:20 pm UTC

[info]doroc_sabah
2006-01-21 01:09 pm UTC (link)
Thus meaning all animals' breeding with one another is rape?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


redwarrior
2006-01-21 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Same here. All the people I know who are high-functioning/Asperger's are some of the horniest people I know. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]doomsday
2006-01-20 09:40 pm UTC (link)
This would be easier to read without all the links to the same page. I'm pretty sure most of us can use a scrollbar.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2006-01-20 10:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-20 10:23 pm UTC

[info]marlo
2006-01-20 09:51 pm UTC (link)
I agree with [info]doomsday.

And I really liked the comment by the person who brought up Maus. I'd never thought about animals masking race before, but it totally happens. And actually earlier today I was thinking about the crows in Dumbo and how I didn't understand them until I was way older.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-01-21 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2006-01-21 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-01-21 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-01-21 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-21 05:43 am UTC

[info]brown_betty
2006-01-21 09:08 am UTC (link)
The belief that animals "can't consent" is untrue; studies have shown it to be false, and even ethologists will admit animals can consent. There are plenty of resources on the internet regarding this issue that will corroborate the veracity of my statement.

Nice attempt to use the argument from authority to justify your preference for animals, but try spelling ethicist right, next time. And something tells me they're a little shaky on the use of corroborate and veracity.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2006-01-21 10:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2006-01-21 10:28 am UTC

[info]jaseroque
2006-01-21 02:02 pm UTC (link)
It's a little worrying that the only bit of this that struck me was the comment "since animals are also driven by the need to reproduce, they can consent to sex." Since after all, sex with a HUMAN isn't going to get them any babies, is it? So by that logic, they can consent, but they default to non-consenting with anything not of their species.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map