Jews are genetically more capable of banking than goyim!
Oh baby

So, there's this forum, right? And there's this guy, right? And he posts this topic, you know, about maternity leave, and how this classroom full of self-identified feminists said that women shouldn't be given extensive maternity leave because it, like, it makes them look weak or something? And there are like, these responses, which are really all, you know, normal and stuff, until this other guy, TruthSeeker, like, starts posting, you know, and he's just, you know, totally insane, right? And he turns the thread into, like, this whrilpool of, you know, wank and crazy, and totally like, you know, kills my brain cells, which is why I'm totally typing like this, right?

So, like, here's some excerpts, because this guy is, like, craaaaazy. Like that one time, when Monica wore socks with sandals? It just totally speaks for itself, you know?

If women and men are to be socially, politically, and economically equal, they are to have the same status in relations of business, marriage, houselife, work, religious positions, etc. Each gender is better suited to certain tasks than the other, and certain institutions regulate certain aspects of themselves, including which positions can be filled by which people. I don't fully agree with some of those positions, but, nevertheless, they stand.

~~~~~

Right, Right. But what is this other "ism" you speak of? I can't think of one.

~~~~~

What it boils down to is the apparent belief by some who call themelves feminists that men and women should be consdiered the same in all respects with the exception of their physical functions of procreation. Some will destroy their own benefits in order to acheive a reflection of that belief.

~~~~~

Political equality= same thing, except instead of wages, government jobs and positions of power.

Social equality= same thing, except that, in this case, certain jobs will be done better by certain genders, races, etc, because it's part of their genetic structure.

~~~~~

My point was that the person who is best at the job should get it, regardless of gender, age, or whatever else. The reason for bringing up the genetic differences is that it just might be that.. what's a good example. That a Jew is a better banker than an Asian (I've got no evidence for this) because his genetic characteristics, combined with his path in life, give him an edge from the beginning of life when it comes to being a banker, whereas an Asian might have a natural edge to.. work on microcomputers.

~~~~~

And that's why crack is bad, kids! There's lots of other good stuff, especially from posters Gust and Quincta, but TruthSeeker went back and deleted a bunch of hir earlier posts, so if you want to, skip to page three. That's when all the crazy about genetics starts up.