Current mood:

freezing my ass off

OMG non-icon stealers are evil gay!!!1
Every now and then, metaquotes gets an evangelist for whatever issue. Here's why Harmony rocks, here's why white people suck, 9/11 is funny, Hanson is gay, blah blah blah.

In this case, a troll boasts that icon stealing is okay and you're a complete retard if you disagree.

Naturally, people disagree.

EDIT: Much love to luckdragonfujur for pointing out the meta poster's reaction to the wank:

And I forgot to say where I got the link to the feed: http://community.livejournal.com/stupid_free/37640.html

And I suck because of this:

****EDIT FOUR: In a startling act of one-sided journalism, the metaquote is picked up on OTF_WANK and I'm called both a troll and an evangelist for icon theft. I wrote a lengthy rebuttal, but accidentally deleted it and can't remember what I said. But my points were valid and I'm not a troll, dammit!!!

*****FINAL EDIT (I think): Okay, I re-wrote my rebuttal on the syndicated feed here. I was amazed by how worked up everyone got about icons, but I'm really irritated by the way my post was mis-represented.

It's really amusing how he chose to put his comment where it's very unlikely he'd get a response ._.

Dear, you don't suck; you're on your toes. Thanks for pointing this out cause I never would have seen it! :)

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

luckdragonfujur
2006-03-06 05:02 am UTC (link)

And I forgot to say where I got the link to the feed: http://community.livejournal.com/stupid_free/37640.html

And I suck because of this:

****EDIT FOUR: In a startling act of one-sided journalism, the metaquote is picked up on OTF_WANK and I'm called both a troll and an evangelist for icon theft. I wrote a lengthy rebuttal, but accidentally deleted it and can't remember what I said. But my points were valid and I'm not a troll, dammit!!!

*****FINAL EDIT (I think): Okay, I re-wrote my rebuttal on the syndicated feed here. I was amazed by how worked up everyone got about icons, but I'm really irritated by the way my post was mis-represented.

It's really amusing how he chose to put his comment where it's very unlikely he'd get a response ._.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	pink_lightning 2006-03-06 05:05 am UTC (link)
	Ah, fantastic. Should I add this to the main post? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	luckdragonfujur 2006-03-06 05:09 am UTC (link)
	I don't see why not :P (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	pink_lightning 2006-03-06 05:17 am UTC (link)
	Heeheehee. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	rubylou 2006-03-06 08:52 pm UTC (link)
	It's really amusing how he chose to put his comment where it's very unlikely he'd get a response. Are you actually silly enough to think that, after all this evidence to the contrary, he's trying to avoid responses? Have you been smoking that grassy knoll? ;-) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	luckdragonfujur 2006-03-06 08:55 pm UTC (link)
	Have you been smoking that grassy knoll? ;-) No, but I'd like some :3 (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	rubylou 2006-03-06 08:58 pm UTC (link)
	Hm. You and me both, my dear! :-D (Reply to this)(Parent)

	miss_padfoot 2006-03-07 12:14 am UTC (link)
	The thought of writing a "lengthy rebuttal" to a wank report is too hilarious for words and makes me wonder how someone can know about the otf_wank feed and yet miss the point of wank comms so completely. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -