|
|
Azzy (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} azawakh) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank,@ 2006-04-14 16:19:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Kibbles and Wank: Meets AAFCO Standards for Nutrition
On dog_lovers, katkia22 has encouraged her daughter to email Iams about PETA's favorite bone and posts Iams' response.
Cue the "IAMZ = SUX0RZ" comments. Along comes northwolf to question that assertion. Naturally, like 99.9% of pet community "debate," wank ensues, whipping up ancient vendettas.
There's plenty of "I'm not doing research for you!" and "She wouldn't read them anyway!" Rozae eventually relents, ignoring the fact that several websites that come up are contrary to their position. Some insanely so.
Of course, you also need "attacks" on someone's pet.
Circular arguments rock, but they become especially tasty when folks focus on the easily cross-referenced Wikipedia definitions of logical fallacies.
"Shun the nonbeliever. Shunnnnnn."
On dog_lovers, katkia22 has encouraged her daughter to email Iams about PETA's favorite bone and posts Iams' response.
Cue the "IAMZ = SUX0RZ" comments. Along comes northwolf to question that assertion. Naturally, like 99.9% of pet community "debate," wank ensues, whipping up ancient vendettas.
There's plenty of "I'm not doing research for you!" and "She wouldn't read them anyway!" Rozae eventually relents, ignoring the fact that several websites that come up are contrary to their position. Some insanely so.
Of course, you also need "attacks" on someone's pet.
Circular arguments rock, but they become especially tasty when folks focus on the easily cross-referenced Wikipedia definitions of logical fallacies.
"Shun the nonbeliever. Shunnnnnn."
Post a comment in response:
