Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Winterfox (winterfox) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-04-18 03:27:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
bad_sex wank
Oh, so apt.

mgo_2_14 posts about a new Connecticut would-be law, i.e. you can't ejaculate on someone's face without their consent.

unperfekt comments: all the ladeez ask for it.

remember: no means yes. yes means twice.


And we're off!

fuckedupinpink: I don't think you have to be a ranting, raging feminist to say: don't fuck with, or triviliaze, the act of consent.

talshoe replies: So, fuckedupinpink, when was it that daddy touched you in the bikini area?... But I'm no psychologist or nothing (noted by the assault on english grammar), but isn't polyamory a way to compensate for sexual abuse as a minor?

And rape isn't funny, damn it!

Ah, rape-related wank. You'll never cease to be fun. But wait, I laughed about something related to rape. I guess I'll just turn in my license to be female now.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map