Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Amaltheia ([info]amaltheia) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-05-20 10:23:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Flippant

LJ Abuse vs Boob Nazis
[info]cali4niachef is informed by LJ Abuse her default icon is inappropriate and to cease using it by the 23rd or face having her account suspended.

Boob Nazis. LJ Abuse. Breastfeeding Icons.

I think we can all see where this is going. ([info]booju_mooju first of all it seems.)

Once the anti-breastfeeding comms get hold of this it should really take off.

Edit the first Thanks to [info]quickfade Apparently [info]hardvice is responsible Icons in comments NSFW.

Edit the second Thanks to a mousie. [info]cf_hardcore join the party.

Edit the third Thanks to [info]freezer It hits [info]metaquotes.

Edit the forth [info]stupid_free weigh in. And [info]fuckyoulist makes an appearance too.

Edit the fifth Just how much further can it spread? As far as retarded_icons, blackfolk and feminist apparently.

Edit the sixth [info]hardvice shows solidarity with the [info]boob_nazis. And [info]magdalene74 has a new lj approved breastfeeding icon.

And to think when I originally posted this I was worried it wasn't wanky enough.

Edit the seventh Annnnnnnnnnd here's anti-feminist joining in the fun.

Edit the eighth Predictably - Exposing LJ Abuse



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


iwanttobeasleep
2006-05-20 08:31 pm UTC (link)
They agreed to the terms of service. If they didn't want to follow them, they shouldn't have paid.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-20 11:41 pm UTC (link)
Breastfeeding in public (OMFG in front of people, even 'minors') is not illegal, infact in many states it is protected by law and is Illegal to ask a mother to stop feeding her child. Breastfeeding is not obscene nor is it explicit... you can have pictures of arses, and you can have pictures of boobs as long as the actual nipple (not areola) is showing, infact you could walk around in public with only your nipples covered and you cant get arrested for indecent exposure.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-21 12:21 am UTC (link)
And yet, somehow, indecent exposure, breastfeeding, and/or obscenity laws still have nothing to do with the LJ TOS.
-another anonymous

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-21 01:40 am UTC (link)
The problem is that what LJ has done is deemed something that is not offensive as offensive.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rekall
2006-05-21 01:57 am UTC (link)
LJ isn't forcing them to get rid of the icon though, only making it so that it is not the default. If they want they want they could click on 'No default' and just choose the boobie icon each time they post and it would be okay.

Besides if they don't like LJ rules they can use another site. It's not like they're being forced to use LJ.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]andra_dodger
2006-05-21 04:22 am UTC (link)
The problem is that what LJ has done is deemed something that is not offensive as offensive.

You act as if there is some objective standard for what's offensive. There isn't.

You act as if preventing someone from using a breastfeeding icon prevents them from breastfeeding. It doesn't.

You act as if LJ has some obligation to host content other than any-damn-content-it-pleases. It doesn't.

On top of which, no one is preventing these people from using the icons in any case.

I'm playing the world's smallest violin for these poor oppressed souls.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-21 05:56 am UTC (link)
Actually some people DO find it a bit offensive. I don't wanna see some woman's naked breasts in the middle of a mall or a restaurant any more than I want to see some random guy's dick hanging out in the same situation.

There are times and places for that sort of thing, but out in public is not one of them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-22 08:36 pm UTC (link)
Sorry, you're not the hungry child, you don't get to decide what's offensive. There is a live human being who requires the breast to be somewhat exposed, there is no one requiring the dick to be hanging out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-24 05:04 am UTC (link)
Then either take the baby somewhere private or use one of those little privacy blankets so the rest of the world doesn't have to see your breast.

It's really not that difficult, and that way everyone is happy.

(For the record, I have no issue with mothers who want to breastfeed in public as long as they use a privacy blanket thing to cover themselves. That's fine. I just don't want to see a naked breast while I'm eating, shopping or whatever.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-22 05:19 pm UTC (link)
Who gets to decide what is and is no0t offensive to everyone else? Offense is in the perception of the offended, and I for one do not care to have you tell me what is and is not 'offensive' to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mookie
2006-05-22 10:59 pm UTC (link)
In other words, it's ok for you to mandate what is considered inoffensive to everyone else.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


iwanttobeasleep
2006-05-21 01:55 am UTC (link)
Wow, you so missed my point completely. LJ gets to decide what will and will not be done with their website. Doesn't matter how beautiful and natural people think breastfeeding is.

And to counter your stupid parellel to it being legal, killing is illegal, but we can still have movies portraiting it. Because reprentations, like icons, and movies, are remarkably different than actually doing it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gingersnaps
2006-05-22 12:50 am UTC (link)
However, when the read the TOS and the FAQ, the FAQ said that default userpics which were sexual or had graphic violence weren't allowed. They changed it to nudity after people started pointing out that breastfeeding pictures aren't sexual.

And no, I'm not a boob nazi, I just think LJ Abuse don't deserve the defense people are giving them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-22 05:21 pm UTC (link)
"They changed it to nudity after people started pointing out that breastfeeding pictures aren't sexual."

Tell that to someone with a BFing fetish.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gingersnaps
2006-05-22 05:24 pm UTC (link)
Ban default icons with feet, in case there are foot fetishists out there...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map