Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Her considerable obliquity ([info]gobsmacked) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-07-09 18:37:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

Is Paris burning? Or just a little itchy?
Tipped off by an anon at this thread, I went over to ONTD and thought that this wank was worthy of posting somewhere. I've never posted to otf_wank before, so I'm not sure if this even belongs here. I'm also not going to do a big C&P. So, here it is:
At ONTD, someone posts up several up-the-dress shots of Paris Hilton in a car. She is apparently not wearing panties - or is she? The debate over the normalcy of Paris' not-so-privates, the state of her nails, the condition of her underwear, etc., etc. rages on for twelve whole pages. WARNING: EXTREMELY NOT WORK-SAFE PICS AT THE LINK
Mostly the same comments repeat over and over and over. Somewhere around page 4, sarieanne sums up the best of the wank for those of us with ADD (or somewhere else to go) in one brief post:
sarieanne
2006-07-07 10:26 pm

I don't know what you think 'firecrotch' means.. but generally it means someone has red hair on their cooter.
Paris has simply let herself get a little stubbly since her last shave.
Honestly, I'm annoyed with this post because of the stupidity of everyone saying that they:
A. Can smell her cunt from here.
B. Got an STD from clicking the link.
C. Think she has an ugly vagina.
Obviously 99% of the community has never seen anyone with a shaved chacha in an un-PhotoShopped un-posted picture before. And it's MEAT CURTAINS.. not beef curtains.
< / end rant>


ETA: VULVA, PLZ.
As jdark pointed out here</i>
Why do people keep calling it vagina? The vulva is on the outside, the vagina is on the inside. This is intrustive photography but not *that* intrusive.

And speaking of intrusive, what's next: a cervix-cam?


YET MORE ETA: Joke from my S.O.
I must confess that "beef curtains" made me laugh and laugh. This attracted the attention of my s.o., who promptly started in with "SNATCH - THE OTHER RED MEAT" and spent the rest of the evening making up ad copy for the "Eat Snatch" campaign. If anyone here would like to try her/his hand at this, feel free. I'm sure I've already heard the worst.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map