Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Damien Raptore ([info]damien) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-07-14 02:05:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Mystified

Defition of irony. Warning, NSFW!
There's wank over [info]bad_sex. *expects a hundred different puns about that to flood her inbox*

[info]cambler, a professional photographer, posts about how his admiration of a 'glamor' model he works with resulted in his wife not wanting to have sex with him.

Fine and dandy so far, right? Well, he also makes the mistake of posting a frame from the set he was working on.

[info]creativexangst makes the first comment and does it have anything to do with the post? Nope. It's all about the photo and how his status as professional photographer makes him critical.

He and [info]lizzvoltage go back and for a little, then the OP shows up and politely asks for con crit. He gets con crit but he also gets (in my opinion) a hell of a lot of attitude. He stays calm thoroughout it all, and [info]lizzvoltage seemingly retracts her opinion and calls him a good egg.

Meanwhile, [info]krysterella jumps in to rant about people that call themselves photographers when they're amateurs, and posts a pic of [info]lizzvoltage. Lizz doesn't react too well and she gets into another tiff with cambler, this time bringing up her photography of the flood and his eight-year-old-daughter seeing his photographs.

While they squabble, [info]emohippie calls hypocrite on Lizz for flying off the handle about the comments on the photograph of herself.

Moving away from that thread, [info]dirtynumbangel thinks the model looks fourteen. [info]emohippie pops up again near the end to point out the irony and cambler responds politely, albeit a little patronizingly (again, my opinion only).

Moral of the story? ...I don't know. I'm still too busy being amused at the idea of wank on [info]bad_sex.

Edit: Uh-oh. Someone made a post about bad_sex stories that aren't really funny. Maybe wank over there isn't as rare as I thought it was.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]kadath
2006-07-14 12:42 am UTC (link)
No comment on the wank, but that photo is pretty fuckin' far from "erotic."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2006-07-14 01:34 am UTC
De gustibus non est disputandum. - [info]kadath, 2006-07-14 01:39 am UTC
Re: De gustibus non est disputandum. - [info]loony666, 2006-07-14 02:21 am UTC
Re: De gustibus non est disputandum. - [info]chibicurmudgeon, 2006-07-15 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-07-14 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2006-07-14 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-07-14 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2006-07-14 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-07-14 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2006-07-14 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 05:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-07-14 05:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-07-14 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-07-14 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2006-07-14 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2006-07-14 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]la_viv, 2006-07-14 08:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2006-07-14 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]apoplexia, 2006-07-14 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-07-14 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2006-07-14 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-07-14 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naeelah, 2006-07-14 05:33 pm UTC
^_^ - [info]freezer, 2006-07-14 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2006-07-14 07:49 pm UTC

[info]symbeline
2006-07-14 12:50 am UTC (link)
I hate to comment on the pic and not the considerable wank, but, except for the disconcertingly weird angle, it's not a bad pic. I know photographers who are far less skilled than that and make money at it.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-07-14 12:50 am UTC (link)
Re: Edit--

but opinions are like assholes..what we might think is stupid
might be completely hilarious to someone else.


Uh, what? I don't think that's how it goes. I...yes, I suppose assholes can be funny sometimes, if lubed properly or prolapsed...actually, I don't know where s/h/it is going with this. And neither do I. Just, no.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-07-14 01:25 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-07-14 03:57 am UTC

[info]musouka
2006-07-14 12:53 am UTC (link)
So...who pissed in lizzvoltage's cornflakes?

(Reply to this)


[info]mindset
2006-07-14 12:54 am UTC (link)
I've seen this guy in a wank before, but I can't remember where. Possibly the same comm, or ONTD, or one of the trainwreck types... But he was using one of his icons that's a photo of his wife's ass, and that's sort of hard to forget. Anyway. :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]exdee, 2006-07-14 01:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-07-14 03:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-07-15 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2006-07-14 05:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2006-07-14 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2006-07-16 12:42 am UTC

[info]dez_chan
2006-07-14 01:21 am UTC (link)
Quite apart from the compositional issues noted above... she looks 14. And not in a good way. And it's not even a real pie.

I love that the photographer has to defend the fact that it IS indeed, a real pie. As though that were the most important part of the conversation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-07-14 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-07-14 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2006-07-14 02:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2006-07-14 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-07-14 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-07-14 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nicolae, 2006-07-14 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-07-14 09:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]entrenous88, 2006-07-14 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2006-07-16 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hakainokami, 2006-07-15 06:04 am UTC

[info]luthe
2006-07-14 01:35 am UTC (link)
This just reminds me of my favorite website Domai. Free pretty boobies for all!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]zuzu, 2006-07-14 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 04:44 am UTC

[info]mmanurere
2006-07-14 01:39 am UTC (link)
Wank or not, I think that picture may have destroyed any remaining lumps of heterosexuality I possessed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-07-14 06:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-07-14 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amasaglajax, 2006-07-17 08:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-15 04:39 am UTC

[info]rotten_fish
2006-07-14 01:45 am UTC (link)
So why isn't it a cherry pie?

(Reply to this)


[info]mcity
2006-07-14 02:07 am UTC (link)
She's not that hot.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2006-07-14 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-07-14 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2006-07-14 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-07-14 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-07-14 11:44 pm UTC

[info]loony666
2006-07-14 02:20 am UTC (link)
Oh, there's a pretty good wank in this entry, too: http://community.livejournal.com/bad_sex/2919251.html

Yeah, bad_sex actually gets wank a lot. Nobody ever posts it, though. Dunno.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]damien, 2006-07-15 09:26 am UTC

[info]khym_chanur
2006-07-14 02:20 am UTC (link)
How is the model standing at that angle without falling over? Unless the bowl of strawberries is bolted to the table and she's using her grip on it to balance herself.

(Reply to this)


notmonkey
2006-07-14 02:26 am UTC (link)
But WHY are the pubes gone?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-07-14 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]symbeline, 2006-07-14 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 07:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lerefuge, 2006-07-19 12:08 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-07-14 03:32 am UTC (link)
Her boobs only look weird because the pose is weird... there's another picture of the model in his personal lj.

http://journalpix.com/CB-J-0533-S.photo

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 05:28 am UTC

[info]wankaholic
2006-07-14 03:50 am UTC (link)
As others have said, bad_sex wank is pretty common. What I'm waiting for is bad_masturbation wank.

Wanking about . . . wanking! :D

(Reply to this)


[info]starkers
2006-07-14 05:23 am UTC (link)
Ahahahah lizzvoltage. IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE HEAT, GET OUT OF THE (NAKED) KITCHEN.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 03:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]starkers, 2006-07-14 03:34 pm UTC

[info]jenny_atrox
2006-07-14 05:24 am UTC (link)
Shut up, Lizzvoltage and enjoy the boobies. Yay boobies.

(Reply to this)


[info]adora_spintriae
2006-07-14 06:19 am UTC (link)
Her boobies belong on Cuteoverload or something. Not particularly sexy, but small and adorable in their own way.

The "that is not a real pie" bit is the best part of this wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2006-07-14 04:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-07-14 08:43 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-07-14 11:10 am UTC (link)
lizzvoltage is way over the top (bitter, much?), but that cambler comes across as a right tosser. "Oh, I'm not really pimping my book that's being published and I will mention my publisher 876 times even though I am not pimping my book but hey, here's a picture from my new book that I'm not pimping. Did I mention my publisher?"

And the picture looks like something out of the "Home Girls" page of those cheap soft-porn mags that have giant crosswords with titles like "Mr Wisdom's Whopper" (oo-er!)

angriestgirl on lj

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-14 04:10 pm UTC

[info]athy
2006-07-14 06:09 pm UTC (link)
Huh, Lizz is a whole lot of pretentious with not a lot of 'backing it up' whoo hoo you do photojournalism, I gotta tell you, the pictures in my newspaper are not something to write home about. To be frank, most of the time they look like someone in a hurry to catch the action and not really caring so much about composition and all the other artstuff you can do when actually sitting down and doing a photoshoot. Thanks for your for your condescension, shove it up your ass.

With that in mind, the picture's not great, she just looks totally unnatural. At least give the girl some V8 if you're gonna make her lean like that. Also, who is the audience for this cookbook? Are you trying to get men to cook delicious strawberry pies by tempting them with nubile young women? I just can't see it having a huge audience. But then again, I guess I don't walk around asking people what they look for in cookbooks.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2006-07-14 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athy, 2006-07-14 09:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2006-07-15 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2006-07-14 11:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athy, 2006-07-15 05:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-07-15 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]athy, 2006-07-15 05:57 pm UTC

[info]acrimonious
2006-07-14 09:49 pm UTC (link)
Lizz is the type of person that makes people fear critics. You have to peel away the layers of obnoxious, snotty potshots to get at the stuff that'll actually help you, and in her case, her concrit doesn't offer much in the way of being helpful. :P

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-07-14 10:02 pm UTC (link)
Finally, a cookbook other than my mother's Better Homes 1970's vintage to masturbate to. Just what I've been looking for!

~saithey-mouse~

(Reply to this)


[info]lush_rimbaud
2006-07-14 11:33 pm UTC (link)
What's with all the people being all like, "Oh, she's not really that attractive and her breasts are weird?" She's a pretty girl and her breasts look completely normal, even if it's not the world's most flattering angle. I mean, maybe she's too "generic" for all you edgy types out there, but I think it's silly to say that she's ugly.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hickorydickory, 2006-07-15 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]acrimonious, 2006-07-15 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2006-07-15 01:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iieee, 2006-07-17 07:34 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-07-15 06:48 am UTC (link)
"I'm curious, how many books have you published?"
whenever an author uses this as an arguement, you know they have nothing better to say to defend their work.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-07-15 02:33 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-07-15 07:41 am UTC (link)
I wonder what it says about me that I thought the pie was the most attractive part of that photo.

I mean, the girls not bad, or anything, but dude . . . pie!


--baskerville

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map