Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Crying out justice, but seeking out triumphs (iwanttobeasleep) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-09-08 23:04:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Warning: There is a NSFW picture on all these links.

[info]rfjason decides it would be amusing to lure a bunch of guys into BDSM into giving him their personal information with a Craigslist personal ad, which he dubbed "The Craigslist Experiment".

He then posts their responses, as well as locations, e-mails and photographs, and invites people to look for people they know.

The comments house staggering numbers of people who find this amusing, and show that rfjason has a whole lot of time on his hands.

One of the identified showed up with threats of legal action.

"Actually, removing any of the information would have made the experiment null and void. I have principles to uphold, you know."

BDSM=abuse and torture, and you so deserve to have your life ruined if you enjoy it.

A mouse shows up to give the identified an opportunity for revenge!

Doms are no different than serial killers.

"We didn't do it to hurt anyone. We did it for the lulz."

ETA:
An article on Waxy.org explains the origin (apparently he is emulating an actual experiment), as well as the legal issues and gives some choice comments.

ETA 2:
There's also an entry on Wired about it, calling him a sociopath, and there's a fair amount of wank in the comments.

Apparently it's also been mentioned in [info]metaquotes but I couldn't find it, and I waded through a whole lot of unfunny posts looking, believe me.



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]redcoast
2006-09-09 04:39 am UTC (link)
Well, there it is.

(Reply to this)


[info]wrongly_amused
2006-09-09 04:47 am UTC (link)
*headdesk*

(Reply to this)


[info]crysiana
2006-09-09 04:58 am UTC (link)
Well, there goes my faith in humanity for the day. At least I won't be losing it later on.

(Why couldn't he have posted that info on lj and gotten himself TOSed, I ask.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-09-10 12:56 am UTC

[info]zinkchan
2006-09-09 05:02 am UTC (link)
Oh, I saw this back when it appeared on the Seattle LJ com. Apparently one of the guys who responded was the husband of one of the mods, so some people are less than the thrilled about it.

Me, I'm just suprised by the number of cock pictures replying to the ad. It's a bit odd to me, but then again it's the internet.

(Reply to this)


[info]gal_montag
2006-09-09 05:10 am UTC (link)
I wonder if rfjason is this big a douchebag in real life or if he's just an internets coward.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]azhidahaki, 2006-09-09 08:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-09-09 04:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2006-09-09 06:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-25 02:00 am UTC

[info]eyesdelight
2006-09-09 05:18 am UTC (link)
This even reached waxy.org.

My head hurts.

(Reply to this)


[info]whimsy_chan
2006-09-09 05:27 am UTC (link)
Wow, that's really shitty. What an asshole.

(Reply to this)


[info]wankaholic
2006-09-09 05:39 am UTC (link)
So glad to see the responses here are different than on LJ . . . it was linked on [info]metaquotes, and response there seemed to be that if you were "stupid enough" to reply to it, you earned your mocking.

. . . um. Just not going to touch on that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2006-09-09 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 12:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2006-09-09 06:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 06:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2006-09-09 06:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:16 pm UTC

[info]luthe
2006-09-09 06:06 am UTC (link)
*hands RFJason and his BDSM hating minions a serving of Bitch, Please with extra bitch sauce*

BDSM != sexual assault. Not even heavy BDSM. Also, practicing BDSM does not automatically make one a bad person. Cheating, is perhaps a sign of untrustworthiness, but that's about it.

*hits the 'BDSM paractioners are the same as serial killers' commenter with the the Clue by Four of Infinite Justice +5*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 06:34 am UTC
[different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 06:52 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 07:30 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]rekall, 2006-09-09 07:48 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-09 08:03 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:33 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-09 09:04 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-11 12:10 pm UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-09-09 04:33 pm UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:21 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]ladyrogue, 2006-09-09 08:39 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 09:08 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]aristaea, 2006-09-09 10:39 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-09 08:42 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 09:10 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-09 09:21 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 10:47 am UTC
Re: [different mousie] - (Anonymous), 2006-09-11 06:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2006-09-09 11:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 12:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2006-09-10 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-09-09 11:30 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-09-09 06:18 am UTC (link)
Eh. Posting their contact information sucks in theory, and it's not a cutesy harmless prank like he keeps saying. It's a jerky thing to do, although I seriously doubt he knew it would spread so far. But lives ruined?

If they're married and their marriages are ruined, what's wrong with that? They're trying to cheat on their wives. Not only that, they will likely continue to cheat and/or attempt cheating because they're probably looking for something they're not getting from their wives.

Careers ruined? Nobody could get away with firing them for their sex life, as far as I know. Lawsuits? This is totally unrelated to their ability to perform their job.

What else would happen to ruin their lives? I don't get it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2006-09-09 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2006-09-09 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2006-09-09 09:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2006-09-09 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarracenia, 2006-09-09 08:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-11 06:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2006-09-09 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-09-09 09:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]easternelflady, 2006-09-11 03:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2006-09-09 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 05:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-10 12:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-09-10 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkvalkyrie, 2006-09-10 04:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-11 02:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-11 04:36 am UTC

[info]derumi
2006-09-09 06:19 am UTC (link)
Sure takes balls to rile up people who enjoy hurting others for sexual pleasure. Especially if their home lives are ruined (in the case of the non-open relationships). Wow.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-09-09 06:27 am UTC (link)
... so people sent their personal info and naughty pictures to a complete stranger and then are all surprised when it got posted on the internet WHY?

~Luna

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-09-09 06:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyrogue, 2006-09-09 08:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-09-09 11:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 09:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-09-09 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-10 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-09-10 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2006-09-10 09:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-10 04:58 pm UTC

[info]chaos_theory
2006-09-09 07:35 am UTC (link)
What an obnoxious thing to do.

Those replies do remind me why I find most male dominants freaky as fuck though. Like, it's sort of hot when someone you know personally is saying carefully selected dirtiness to you, but it's entirely different when strange men are calling you a whore and telling you they're going to beat you and then fuck you in a way you have specifically said you don't want to be fucked. Not saying it's wrong, just that sometimes it creeps me out like whoa.

Glad I could GIP.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2006-09-09 11:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerel, 2006-09-09 01:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2006-09-11 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-09 03:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2006-09-09 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2006-09-09 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-09 09:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-10 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-10 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-11 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-11 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2006-09-13 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-13 02:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitch_ass_hoe, 2006-09-20 09:02 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-09-09 07:44 am UTC (link)
Rfjason does sound like a complete douche, but I have to say that I don't feel an iota of sympathy for the guys cheating on their wives who have now gotten burned.

(Actually, I know cheating spouses was what occurred in the original experiment, and that it hasn't been specifically mentioned as being an issue for this experiment, but who here believes that all of the respondents were actually single or in-open-relationships men?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-10 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]missdaisy, 2006-09-20 03:58 pm UTC

[info]ryuutchi
2006-09-09 07:57 am UTC (link)
S-C-H-A-D-E-N-F-R-E-U-D-E!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 05:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-09-09 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 08:15 pm UTC

[info]azhidahaki
2006-09-09 08:33 am UTC (link)
What a dickhead.

(Reply to this)


[info]katienichol
2006-09-09 09:13 am UTC (link)
What a crappy thing to do, but I expect no less from Rfjason.

I recognize one of those guys. And now I've seen his peen. Terrific.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-09-09 09:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]katienichol, 2006-09-09 09:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerel, 2006-09-09 01:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-09-09 06:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]katienichol, 2006-09-09 06:51 pm UTC

[info]shaggydogstail
2006-09-09 12:41 pm UTC (link)
I might be slightly less irritated with rfjason if he didn't try to dress the whole thing up as some sort of 'sociological experiment' (bitch, please) or making out he's performing some sort of social service for all those poor, cheated-on wives by posting pictures of their husbands' dicks on the internet. If you must behave like a douche, you should at least have the decency to admit that you're being a douche.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-09-09 01:25 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-09 01:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hanncoll, 2006-09-09 01:39 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]hanncoll, 2006-09-09 02:16 pm UTC

[info]oxydosic
2006-09-09 04:29 pm UTC (link)
What. A. Prick.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snarkbunny, 2006-09-09 06:52 pm UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2006-09-09 04:43 pm UTC (link)
As for "lives ruined:" all it's going to take is one person, one of the aggrieved responders to the ad, or an anti-Craigslist activist, or an anti-rfjason troll (the antitroll-troll, sort of like an antimissile-missile!) to see the RCW citation in the Waxy.org comments thread, and email all the links to Rob McKenna's office (and yes, the Attorney General of this rainy state is the rain god) or to a newspaper columnist like Robert Jameson, and all hell will be breaking loose.

Speaking of subs: I think [info]rfjason has been angling for reality to fuck him over and make him cry for a long time.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-09-10 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-09-10 08:15 pm UTC

[info]seiberwing
2006-09-09 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Oh god, this whole thing makes me feel ill. No one's got a right to spill people's dirty laundry like that.

And if it was a damn social service to those getting cheated on, he could have sent them private letters or something instead of letting the world know.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]missdaisy, 2006-09-20 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-20 04:04 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-09-09 05:07 pm UTC (link)
Wow. How can anyone be such an asshole?

(Reply to this)


[info]b_jellybean
2006-09-09 05:10 pm UTC (link)
One of the respondants has the SN rolliegoalie21 which made me have horrible thoughts about Dwayne Roloson soliciting sex online.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-09-10 05:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]b_jellybean, 2006-09-10 02:50 pm UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2006-09-09 05:23 pm UTC (link)
This has also been picked up by Wired News where the label "narcissistic sociopath" is correctly applied.

repost to fix frelled html

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2006-09-09 10:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-09-09 11:27 pm UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map