Current mood:

GRRRRRR

wankbait: homeless whores!
Someone makes this post in brutal_honesty.: Use your vagina!
The only way a woman can be homeless is by choice.Any woman who finds herself on the street just has'nt realized the power of her own vagina. It doesnt matter how ugly, wierd, or smelly you are there is always some man that will give you shelter. He will buy you food,water and shelter, and the drugs that got you in this predicament. Yes, it basically means you're a whore, but hey, isnt a shower and a meal worth it?

Wankbait? Troll? Just a complete fuckbag? Who knows. But people bring the smackdown within the first four comments.

[ETA]: Then there's this lovely comment: Aren't all women whores anyway?

I went "haha" when I read that, thinking the commenter was joking. FAIL. My faith in human beings is apparently still too strong: [info]mengus:
It's particularly funny that this comment was made by a woman.

[info]cuntchocula
I was including myself in that comment. We're all guilty of exchanging sex for something.

No. Just... no.

[ETA2]: Thanks to wankaholic for the link to the metaquotes post: mengus
"I'm sorry that you hate the power of your vagina."

Here:
Debating with an uber feminist is super lulzy.

Because mentioning you don't think VAGINA POWERZ solve everything? Makes you an uber-feminist.

[ETA3]: I have a feeling mengus (of the metaquoted comment above) is a troll. There's a post by he/she/it further down in b_h that can't possibly be anything other than trolling (or, it could be, but my mind would explode from trying to compute the stupid): The Child Free: If the function of all biological life is to reproduce, then those that deliberately choose not to have kids are genetic anomalies. Mutants, if you will, that use reason as a pretext to go against nature. To wit, that's Natural Selection in action. They are failures. At life.

Oh God, that's funny.

Kind of unrelated, but so WTF worthy I had to share.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	hobbitsexual 2006-09-12 12:35 pm UTC (link)
	most specifically the remark about refusing to abandon your most basic human dignity but the one about lowering your standards "that far" can get a special mention too. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

jar
2006-09-12 12:48 pm UTC (link)

The OP in b_h was implying that all homeless women should sponge off a man to get out of their current circumstances, not become well paid, professional prostitutes choosing a job. There's a difference and I would say that living on the street selling your body for food and a shower isn't particularly dignified, and I can't see how it isn't "lowering standards" either.

Personally, and I can't speak for other commenters, but I have no problems with prostitutes. Do whatever you like with your life and your body. Anyone who chooses that as their job or life, that’s fine.

The implication that homeless women can’t do anything else about their circumstances pisses me off. As does the implication that any homeless woman could actually do what the OP suggests.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	semirecluse 2006-09-12 03:15 pm UTC (link)
	Or should. "Homeless? It's your own fault! Whip out that vagina, stat! WHY ARE YOU STILL STANDING THERE?" (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jar 2006-09-13 12:21 am UTC (link)
	That too! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	greenling 2006-09-13 05:46 am UTC (link)
	Mine? Oh, that could've been offensive on so many levels. I suppose I failed at finding a way to avoid all of them without killing it; it's not so much that I believe that nonsense as that I'm a bad comedian, if it helps at all. Regardless, mea culpa. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -