Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



seiberwing ([info]seiberwing) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-09-28 20:43:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
More CO wank!
There is posted a picture of a Pomerian and a chick in less than the best of positions.

People predict wank, and the wank appears.

i'm so done with this site. you don't care what you put up here.

cute overload needs to take the "cute" out of the name.

that is absolutely a revolting picture. if you are not disgusted by that pic, then you're a poor excuse for an animal lover.


People attempt to excuse the pic:

I doubt the pictures would have been posted on the Internet if something bad happened to the little chicklette.

A little cringe-worthy, but nothing so bad as to stop coming to this site. Geez people, chill out.


I own a pomeranian and he has the softest mouth of any dog I've ever owned. The chick is fine. If you don't know what a soft mouth is read the Big Red series.

But the wank goes on.

How clever you all are with your made up words and snide attitudes here.
Heavan forbid someone disagrees with the site (A Thinker, Teugh Cats, Redzilla, Simple minded Pollyanna etc...etc...), you all swarm like locusts to squash the evil one with the independent thought.

WHO cares if it is a soft mouth breed? WHO cares if YOUR pom never crushed a chick in it's mouth.
It's a disgusting pic. that one would never expect to see on a site titled "CUTE OVERLOAD".



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-09-29 01:04 am UTC (link)
Teehee! (seriously, that was my vocal response!) A chick and a pomeranian!

I don't think it's disgusting. I would think it would be disgusting if the next picture was of a mangled chick. Awww.

(Reply to this)


[info]emiweebee
2006-09-29 01:04 am UTC (link)
That's...actually kind of adorable.

Are Pomeranians actually known for being soft-mouthed? I think only retrievers are soft; small dogs like that were usually ratters, nasty little things.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-09-29 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2006-09-29 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-09-29 04:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-09-29 02:12 pm UTC

[info]khym_chanur
2006-09-29 01:08 am UTC (link)
There is posted a picture of a Pomerian and a chick

Before I clicked the link, I thought by "chick" you meant "woman", and, well, my imagination...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2006-09-29 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-09-29 01:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-09-29 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-09-29 01:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 02:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cat_mcdougall, 2006-09-29 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]red_eft, 2006-09-29 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stellabymoor, 2006-09-29 01:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashes, 2006-09-29 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]okalintu, 2006-09-29 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linadarkstar, 2006-10-01 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]symbeline, 2006-09-29 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-09-29 02:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]twocorpses, 2006-09-29 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2006-09-29 03:23 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-30 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jetamors, 2006-09-29 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - eviemouse, 2006-09-29 08:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2006-09-29 02:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 02:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2006-09-29 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruby_tuesday, 2006-09-29 04:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2006-10-01 07:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-09-29 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibicurmudgeon, 2006-09-29 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sesana, 2006-09-29 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-09-29 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]number13baby, 2006-09-29 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cafferty, 2006-09-29 04:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-09-29 12:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 01:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cafferty, 2006-09-29 02:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-09-30 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-03 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]keleri, 2006-09-29 04:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fevered_ego, 2006-09-29 10:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-09-29 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-30 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fevered_ego, 2006-09-30 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-29 06:57 pm UTC

[info]mookie
2006-09-29 01:15 am UTC (link)
I think it's cute.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-09-29 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-09-29 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-29 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2006-09-29 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-29 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 04:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-29 05:18 am UTC
OT - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-09-29 03:58 am UTC
Re: OT - [info]mookie, 2006-09-29 04:54 pm UTC
Re: OT - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-09-30 12:36 am UTC
I think it's cute, with Pommy, chickie... - [info]shaysdays, 2006-09-29 06:33 am UTC
Re: I think it's cute, with Pommy, chickie... - [info]mookie, 2006-09-29 04:59 pm UTC
Re: I think it's cute, with Pommy, chickie... - [info]shaysdays, 2006-09-29 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-09-29 02:14 pm UTC

[info]onaga
2006-09-29 01:17 am UTC (link)
you all swarm like locusts to squash the evil one with the independent thought.

...

...BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_mouse, 2006-09-29 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-29 05:00 am UTC

[info]brown_betty
2006-09-29 01:18 am UTC (link)
Oh NOES! Why didn't someone warn me dogs were carnivores! I need to go withdraw from society now.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]miharu, 2006-09-29 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-09-29 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-09-29 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2006-09-29 09:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]attilathebun, 2006-09-29 12:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]misakichi, 2006-09-29 03:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-09-29 02:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miharu, 2006-09-29 03:00 am UTC
Geek time! - [info]shaysdays, 2006-09-29 07:29 am UTC
Re: Geek time! - [info]threegoldfish, 2006-09-29 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-09-30 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-09-29 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2006-09-29 06:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-09-29 01:46 pm UTC

[info]xero_sky
2006-09-29 01:21 am UTC (link)
I'll just pretend it's a Peep. Then we're all good.

Eww! No! Then it would be doggie abuse.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-09-29 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frau_eva, 2006-09-29 07:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-09-30 03:27 am UTC

[info]doomsday
2006-09-29 01:27 am UTC (link)
if you are not disgusted by that pic, then you're a poor excuse for an animal lover.

And everyone knows that all animals are vegetarians!

(Reply to this)


[info]mindset
2006-09-29 01:28 am UTC (link)
The font on my flist keeps making every mention of "pom" read like "porn".

Just thought you'd like to know!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]varkias, 2006-09-29 05:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]zing_och, 2006-09-29 01:09 pm UTC

[info]sailorjpg
2006-09-29 01:36 am UTC (link)
AWWWWWWWWW!!!

er...please, continue.

(Reply to this)


[info]frequentmouse
2006-09-29 01:42 am UTC (link)
Suddenly want to see WTF and the freedom guy from the Absolute Write wank go at it, mano a mano, may the sloogiest win...

(Reply to this)


[info]semirecluse
2006-09-29 01:51 am UTC (link)
Cute Overload is really unbelievably wanky considering everyone there Loves Teh Cuddly. You'd think they'd be gentle retiring types? But you'd be wrong.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bookbug87, 2006-09-29 02:48 am UTC

[info]hearsawho
2006-09-29 01:56 am UTC (link)
I kind of think at this point that Meg picks those sorts of photos on purpose, knowing the wanksplosion that will come, and she sits back and has a good laugh over it. I doubt she even reads the comments -- just watches the number climb and climb.

Or at least that's what I'd do.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]madelfdisease, 2006-09-29 07:15 am UTC

[info]aqua_blurr
2006-09-29 01:58 am UTC (link)
Who's da cutest wittle Pom-Pom? Who's got da fluffiest puff of chicky-chick love in its mouff?

*blows raspberries into Pomeranian's fluffly tufts of neck furrrrrr*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-09-29 01:59 am UTC

[info]gal_montag
2006-09-29 02:18 am UTC (link)
Weren't Poms bred for ratting? Besides the fact that they're vile, hateful little monsters, soft mouths my ass.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2006-09-29 05:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-09-29 02:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashinae, 2006-09-30 05:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-01 12:17 pm UTC

[info]ladyvorkosigan
2006-09-29 02:31 am UTC (link)
Okay, presumably the picture wouldn't have been posted if the chick wasn't okay, but I see the way my dog picks up stuffed animals and shakes them like he's breaking their necks so I admit, I gaped a bit at the second picture.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sesana, 2006-09-29 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miharu, 2006-09-29 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misakichi, 2006-09-29 03:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ahiru, 2006-09-29 01:30 pm UTC

[info]aerobot
2006-09-29 02:58 am UTC (link)
Teh Cute = VERY SERIOUS BUSINESS.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-09-29 03:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-09-29 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-09-29 10:17 pm UTC

[info]scootermcgaffin
2006-09-29 03:03 am UTC (link)
Andi, I think, has the best comment.

I ate a chicken yesterday. It was darn good. No photos were taken of the event.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-09-29 02:24 pm UTC

[info]chaimonkey
2006-09-29 03:39 am UTC (link)
All this "3rd pic" bullshit... Just think what would've happened if Meg had switched the order from the start!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-09-29 06:04 am UTC

[info]mcity
2006-09-29 03:40 am UTC (link)
Heavan forbid someone disagrees with the site (A Thinker, Teugh Cats, Redzilla, Simple minded Pollyanna etc...etc...), you all swarm like locusts to squash the evil one with the independent thought.
We must all tolerate dissent! Think different! Be unique! For the good of the Republik!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-09-29 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-09-29 04:14 am UTC

[info]ashes
2006-09-29 03:53 am UTC (link)
I expected to see a dog and a chick-aka-woman, and thus was disappointed. A dog gnawing on a chicken will not properly distract me from my paper!

(And seriously? These people who look at cute pictures all day need a bit of brain stimulation.)

(Reply to this)


[info]jenny_atrox
2006-09-29 04:59 am UTC (link)
Chickie go SQUISH! BWA-HA-HA-HA!

(Reply to this)


[info]memorycharm
2006-09-29 05:01 am UTC (link)
I *knew* there would be wank when I saw that pic! My favorite comment was the one wondering if the chick pooped in the dog's mouth, since chicks poop when you squeeze them--as seen on "Dirty Jobs".

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-09-30 03:29 am UTC

[info]fevered_ego
2006-09-29 07:26 am UTC (link)
To become a real internet legend, the puppy needs to choke to death trying to say "fluffy bunnies" with that mouthful.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-09-29 07:45 am UTC

[info]ryuutchi
2006-09-29 07:29 am UTC (link)
I... but... Dude, chicks are more than half fluff that that point in their development. It's not being squished at all! The pup's just HOLDING it there.

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map