Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



because grub butt is a justice ʘ‿ʘ ([info]tez) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-10-07 21:41:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*snork*

IM IN UR COMMZ SCREENING UR COMMENTZ
Cheese to the mouse on [info]wank_report who came up with this one.

There's a comm on LJ called [info]thequestionclub that exists purely to answer questions. Any questions, from 'what's your favorite soup' to 'what do stay-at-home wives without kids do while they're at home?" Now, there's a few groundrules about this, and one of them is the following: Please refrain from posting multiple questions in a short period of time. If you're posting more than twice in a given block of ten or so posts, you're probably posting too frequently.

Simple enough, right?

Not really.

[info]madrigalskylark puts up four posts within a very short amount of time. On his fourth post one of the mods, [info]shippo, points out this is against comm rules. He isn't really taken seriously.

Not three hours later, he posts again on the grounds that 'well, it's past midnight so technically it's the next day so I waited long enough'. This doesn't go over well...but then, apparently, someone catches him screening and/or deleting comments on this post. Thumping bad form, as is pointed out to him with little effect.

About six hours later, [info]crazykimmy asks the following question:

How do you feel about screening comments in TQC? Especially if those comments are because you did not follow the rules?

The very first comment belongs to [info]madrigalskylark and he uses it to a) pitch a fit and b) make the world all about him. Not even being told that it's a valid question, inspired by his issue but not attacking him, will get him to shut up. Every single person that posts saying it's lame or some variation thereof is the recipient of one of his lovely attacks.

Godwin's gets broken and such is pointed out via image macro.

Screenshots of the offending comments.

Someone doesn't understand general comm etiquette. Plus macro.

And someone catches the wanker contradicting himself, oh noes!

How to find a comment.

Lots of image macros, mostly when something goes screaming over his head. Lots of attempts to have the last word. Lots of failure.

ETA: After trolling someone's personal LJ, our friend gets himself banninated. There is much rejoicing. The 'kill a baby' post referenced here was him asking something to the effect of 'if you could end world hunger/war/poverty/insert bad social shit here by killing one human baby would you kill the baby?' Being as I am a dork, I did not manage to cap the thing. Mea culpa.

The ETA Strikes Back: So apparently there was an earlier kerfluffle that directly ties into this. [info]sunsetcloud asked a question about what animal bits are in sausage; TQC members don't take too well to that sort of thing since you can google or wiki the answer real fast. Post gets bahleeted, but account is saved for posterity here.

Sausage moment (thank you, mousie).

Poll re: the comment disabling kerfluffle.

And lo and behold, look what pops up: [info]nicequestionclb (and check out this most recent post). Check out the maintainer's userinfo and friends, specifically. Seems our wankers formed a commune -- and an exclusive one at that! (Thanks for that last link, [info]caito!)


First wank post. I feel so pretty.



(Post a new comment)


[info]hallidae
2006-10-08 04:58 am UTC (link)
...Why hasn't he been banned yet?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tez
2006-10-08 05:13 am UTC (link)
Especially with stuff like this going on. Ai yai yai.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2006-10-08 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 05:25 am UTC
My pictures loves your icon. It's Christ Self-Love. - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-10-08 12:20 pm UTC
Re: My pictures loves your icon. It's Christ Self-Love. - [info]moonjaguar, 2006-10-08 02:48 pm UTC
Re: My pictures loves your icon. It's Christ Self-Love. - [info]singe, 2006-10-08 05:07 pm UTC
Re: My pictures loves your icon. It's Christ Self-Love. - [info]shadowkitty, 2006-10-08 06:38 pm UTC
Re: My pictures loves your icon. It's Christ Self-Love. - [info]moonjaguar, 2006-10-08 09:21 pm UTC

[info]moonjaguar
2006-10-08 05:15 am UTC (link)
Is he trying to see how fast he gets banned?

This pin's MySpace profile says he's 19. Either he looks old enough to be his own father or else he's subtracting twenty from his true age.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tez
2006-10-08 05:26 am UTC (link)
Not fast enough, apparently.

Premature aging. He should have used more sunscreen.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lottelita
2006-10-08 07:13 am UTC (link)
Christ on a cracker, that is some MARATHON wank right there.

Special award goes to [info]chrysaliswing for posting "[info]madrigalskylark, go fuck yourself" at LEAST three separate times.

Is that comm always dramalicious, or was this a notable exception?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 07:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-08 01:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-08 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-09 01:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2006-10-09 10:42 pm UTC

[info]pocketfox
2006-10-08 07:18 am UTC (link)
I don't think I've ever seen Godwin's Law broken so fast. O.o

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-10-08 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pocketfox, 2006-10-08 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2006-10-08 02:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pocketfox, 2006-10-08 06:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-09 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pocketfox, 2006-10-09 01:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-09 01:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pocketfox, 2006-10-09 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2006-10-08 07:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-10-08 02:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-10-08 02:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-08 02:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thexphial, 2006-10-08 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-08 02:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2006-10-08 04:02 pm UTC

[info]visp
2006-10-08 07:42 am UTC (link)
God, he was annoying. Seriously made you want to beat the stupid out of him.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-10-08 11:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2006-10-08 06:53 pm UTC

[info]verpon
2006-10-08 12:03 pm UTC (link)
Halfway through wading through the threads, I decided that I was going to adblock wildcarding all his icons because I was getting sick of seeing his mugshot next to every other post.

Then I cried a little inside because adblock doesn't carry a "block idiocy" feature. Now that would be a popular download

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]visp, 2006-10-08 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]verpon, 2006-10-08 07:11 pm UTC

[info]mookie
2006-10-08 12:24 pm UTC (link)
*vainly attempts to resist urge to take remark about sausage and turn it into a comment about e. coli*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-10-08 11:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-09 01:54 am UTC
This seems suspicously timed...
[info]freezer
2006-10-08 01:37 pm UTC (link)
...And themed...

nicequestionclb

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: This seems suspicously timed... - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 06:10 pm UTC
Re: This seems suspicously timed... - [info]caito, 2006-10-08 08:22 pm UTC
Re: This seems suspicously timed... - [info]freezer, 2006-10-08 08:27 pm UTC
Re: This seems suspicously timed... - [info]caito, 2006-10-08 08:29 pm UTC
Re: This seems suspicously timed... - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 08:28 pm UTC
Re: This seems suspicously timed... - [info]caito, 2006-10-08 08:31 pm UTC
Sorry, No Homers - [info]verpon, 2006-10-08 09:36 pm UTC

iwanttobeasleep
2006-10-08 02:00 pm UTC (link)
I was wondering if this was going to get up here. I love my wanky little comm.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 08:28 pm UTC

[info]oxydosic
2006-10-08 03:07 pm UTC (link)
Wow, [info]madrigalskylark is a fuckwit. I particularly like how he keeps defending himself by saying that there's nothing in the community rules against screening posts while simultaneously claiming he didn't know about the 'only so many posts at once' rule. Guess he only takes the time to actually read the comm rules when it's to his benefit.

And that contradiction was beautiful. Busted!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2006-10-08 04:42 pm UTC

[info]rikiki
2006-10-08 03:44 pm UTC (link)
And to think, I might almost have been a part of this wank. I saw one of the posts of his, and couldn't figure out why the first commenter was being snarky at him. Interesting. If I'd been spending more time on my 'other' filter, I could've watched it unfold.

But wow, that is some special right there.

(Reply to this)


[info]seiberwing
2006-10-08 04:32 pm UTC (link)
There's nothing against the rules in many comms of posting pictures of your dick, and yet for some odd reason, most people don't do it. It's called social common sense.

(Reply to this)


[info]frequentmouse
2006-10-08 04:51 pm UTC (link)
I'm having trouble getting past the wanker's user name, myself: [info]madrigalskylark sounds way too Late Victorian Valentine-ish to be attached to such a dick.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-10-08 05:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2006-10-08 07:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-10-08 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 10:04 pm UTC

[info]singe
2006-10-08 05:18 pm UTC (link)
Gaaaaaah, there's Gwenhyffar's uterus icon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2006-10-08 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-10-08 10:17 pm UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2006-10-08 06:31 pm UTC (link)
Aaand... another mouse weighs in with more TQC angst.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 09:00 pm UTC

[info]itsirtou
2006-10-08 09:56 pm UTC (link)
So someone (who apparently lives in Canada) tells him to "lube up for the ride" because the comm isn't going to change just for him, and he replies with:

"Nice motto you guys have there at the University of Toronto. I'm sure that's just what that one dude shouted before he shot all those kids up at that college recently, right?"

WHAT.

Then when the person replies with "That was in fucking Montreal," he replies OH SO WITTILY with "It was Canada. Same deal. You could insult me about 9/11 and it'd mean about the same."

I...I don't even know what to say to that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-10-08 10:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - jenova, 2006-10-09 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-10-09 12:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2006-10-09 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2006-10-09 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-09 05:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2006-10-09 10:45 pm UTC

[info]mistal
2006-10-08 10:31 pm UTC (link)
How about not talking about matters you're uneducated in?

I didn't know you needed a degree in LJ to know about deleting/not deleting comments on a community.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-10-08 11:07 pm UTC (link)
Hey, look! (http://community.livejournal.com/thequestionclub/14235777.html)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-10-08 11:11 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-10-08 11:19 pm UTC (link)
FAIL. You completely left out one of the best parts of the sunsetcloud sausage drama.

http://community.livejournal.com/thequestionclub/14178335.html

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-08 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-09 12:02 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-10-08 11:49 pm UTC (link)
I've been waiting for this to show up. =D

(Reply to this)


[info]seiberwing
2006-10-09 05:31 am UTC (link)
Exclusive meaning banning almost everyone who applies, yay.

(Reply to this)


[info]slackerbitch
2006-10-09 06:38 am UTC (link)
So ... it seems like most of the posters are fun and enjoy the whole randomness of it, and the rest post "questions" that are really just drama-whoring along the lines of "Here's what's going on in my life, pity me and pretend you care!"

Or at least, I was skimming entries just to follow this wank and now I know all about someone's Tragic Saga on the Interwebz.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Heart! - [info]cadesama, 2006-10-09 10:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-10-09 07:04 pm UTC

[info]goblin
2006-10-09 01:02 pm UTC (link)
Is [info]thebitingfairy actually in every single community on lj?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ruby_tuesday, 2006-10-09 05:48 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map