Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Maria the Lost ([info]mariagoner) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-10-21 02:52:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:Regina Specktor-- Us

How Sexy do YOU find Ayn Rynd?
A few months ago, self described "atheist libertarian feminist geek girl" Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passey posts an interesting entry in her 'Bildungsroman' detailing how tired she is of being constantly hit upon by the male readers of her blog... especially when they don't live up to her high standards, which the liberatrian in Passey justifies with some rather... questionable statistics detailing her weight, beauty (based on HotorNot.com), education and masculine interests. Seriously, I have no idea how anyone could read about her totally-not-artificially-inflated-at-all stats without being overcome with hilarity pity awe-struck amazement at her sheer cheek lust? Certainly not her commenters-- some of whom actually laugh more with than at her!

In addition to beefing up her own ego, Passey tells men who can't live up to her high standards to either (and I quote) "lower [their] standards" and start dating "fat single mothers," "look in the developing world" for women desperate for green-cards, or "improve" themselves as much as she has over the years. Understandably, quite a few other feminists on the web weren't happy with her "feminist" suggestions.

Meanwhile another blog dedicates an entry on how Passey might not be quite as attractive as she portrays herself as being in her carefully photoshopped blog pictures.

However, in the end, Passey claims she comes off all the better for for having garnered a crazy amount of hits for the post in question. After all, as long as she's known, who *cares* how many people think she's a self-entitled twit that couldn't find her own arse with an atlas?

A twee bit old but still screamingly hilarious! Libertarianism + an overinflated sense of self-esteem will NEVER stop being funny, y'all.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]semirecluse
2006-10-21 08:02 am UTC (link)
You are a moderately attractive individual who completely spoils her chances with ridiculous egotism and grossly-inflated self-worth until you are less attractive than the bottomfeeding neckbearded idiots that inhabit the Blogosphere and form your fanbase.

Try visiting reality sometime, sweetums, it's a wonderful tonic for delusions of grandeur.


Oh SNAP.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-10-21 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-21 05:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-21 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-10-21 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]keleri, 2006-10-21 07:32 pm UTC

[info]wankprophet
2006-10-21 08:33 am UTC (link)
For someone who looks like they're prepping for a possible future career in the carnival as the world's first botulistic albino chipmunk, she certainly has a high opinion of herself. Though I tend to question the taste, judgment and, quite frankly, intellect of anyone who uses a website called "HotorNot" as an reliable source of empirical data about her personal qualities. If ever Wikipedia wishes to promote itself as the font of utter and sublime truth, it could do worse than to note that: "At least we're more reliable than HotOrNot.com for all your informational needs."

Though I wonder why, if she's trying to avoid such attention, she doesn't just tell everyone to fuck off rather than sounding like she's posting a personal ad, albeit the sort of personal ad one might expect to find in the classifieds of stud farm newsletter.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-10-21 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gobsmacked, 2006-10-21 08:09 pm UTC

[info]ichigatsu
2006-10-21 08:53 am UTC (link)
Where has this woman been reported for wank before?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-10-21 09:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ichigatsu, 2006-10-21 09:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-10-21 08:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gobsmacked, 2006-10-21 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-10-21 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-10-21 05:04 pm UTC
Song lyrics - (Anonymous), 2006-10-21 06:35 pm UTC
Re: Song lyrics - (Anonymous), 2006-10-21 08:15 pm UTC
Re: Song lyrics - [info]gobsmacked, 2006-10-21 08:19 pm UTC
Re: Song lyrics - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-10-22 03:09 am UTC
Re: Song lyrics - (Anonymous), 2006-10-23 10:42 am UTC
Re: Song lyrics - (Anonymous), 2006-10-23 08:10 pm UTC
Re: Song lyrics - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-10-26 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ichigatsu, 2006-10-22 01:31 am UTC
P.S.
[info]ichigatsu
2006-10-21 08:55 am UTC (link)
Look in the developing world. If you’re literate with a home computer and an internet connection you are very wealthy compared to the rest of the world. Citizenship or legal permanent residency in a rich country makes you more attractive to women in poorer countries. Your value on the dating market is thus much higher there.

Please, don't tell them this. We have enough of these "winners" here as it is.
-someone in the developing world.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: P.S. - [info]smo, 2006-10-21 06:42 pm UTC
Re: P.S. - [info]semirecluse, 2006-10-22 12:53 am UTC
Re: P.S. - [info]smo, 2006-10-23 04:15 pm UTC
Re: P.S. - [info]semirecluse, 2006-10-23 04:42 pm UTC
Re: P.S. - [info]smo, 2006-10-23 05:09 pm UTC
Re: P.S. - [info]pyrrah, 2006-10-21 10:01 pm UTC

[info]jar
2006-10-21 08:59 am UTC (link)
My god. She is in deep, deep denial love with herself, isn't she?

(Reply to this)


[info]slavekitty
2006-10-21 10:11 am UTC (link)
Anyanka has a blog!

I liked that one best of all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-10-21 07:17 pm UTC

[info]julian_black
2006-10-21 11:28 am UTC (link)
Oh, this twit--I honestly want to smack her for her misuse of the term "Bildungsroman." So much for her education.

As for her claims to attractiveness, the studio headshot she uses on her blog is very flattering. So flattering, that it might as well be of another woman altogether. Less formal photographs of her reveal that she's just another not-terribly-attractive geek girl, and that she has no lips to speak of.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gun, 2006-10-22 01:57 am UTC

[info]cafferty
2006-10-21 01:12 pm UTC (link)
Egotisim on this scale makes God kill kittens. :(

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-10-21 01:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2006-10-21 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-10-21 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2006-10-22 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-10-22 02:49 am UTC

[info]mcity
2006-10-21 01:13 pm UTC (link)
So, basically, "I'm a pretty girl. I'm a pretty girl. I'm a pretty girl. I'm a pretty girl. I'm a pretty girl..."

PS: RFJason alert in the comments of this entry.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]queencallipygos, 2006-10-23 02:37 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-10-21 02:12 pm UTC (link)
IIRC she's allegedly related to Jameth.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-10-21 05:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-21 06:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-21 09:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2006-10-21 11:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mercutia, 2006-10-21 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2006-10-22 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-22 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-10-22 07:16 am UTC

[info]napalmnacey
2006-10-21 02:35 pm UTC (link)
I am a very high-quality woman. I know that sounds arrogant, but let’s consider the facts:

* I’m slim (whereas 62% of American women age 20 to 74 are overweight)
* I’m attractive (my new picture has been rated more attractive than 86% of the women on Hot or Not -- and the women who upload their pictures are a self-selected sample that is probably already biased towards being more attractive than the general female population)
* I’m relatively young (whereas 82% of American adult women are over 30 years old)
* I’m intelligent (IQ tested at 145 when I was a child, which is 3 standard deviations above the mean -- higher than 99.85% of the population. Even if I’ve gotten dumber as I’ve aged I’m probably still at least a 130, which is higher than 97.5% of the population.)
* I’m educated (whereas 77% of American women do not have bachelor’s degrees)
* I have my financial shit together (no debt, perfect credit history, 6+ months living expenses saved, adequate insurance, self employed)
* I have a strong libido and love having sex (my lover *never* has to beg, unless it’s for me to let him get some sleep!)
* Most of my interests tend to be more popular with men than women: science fiction, libertarianism, blogging, politics, economics, guns, gambling, etc.


... Yeah. But no amount of years, learning or effort is going to change the fact that she's a raging bitch.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2006-10-21 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-21 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-10-22 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2006-10-21 06:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-10-21 07:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2006-10-21 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-10-21 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-10-22 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarcastic_elf, 2006-10-21 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarcastic_elf, 2006-10-21 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2006-10-21 08:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2006-10-21 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-21 09:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2006-10-21 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-22 05:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2006-10-23 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-10-23 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chrome327, 2006-10-24 05:11 pm UTC

[info]kahteh
2006-10-21 02:36 pm UTC (link)
The only person she's fooling there is herself. :-(

(Reply to this)


dracothelizard
2006-10-21 02:51 pm UTC (link)
Do all Ayn Rand fans have ridiculously huge egos or is that just this woman and Terry Goodkind?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]visp, 2006-10-21 06:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-10-22 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-22 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marciamarcia, 2006-10-23 05:26 pm UTC
In addition:
[info]napalmnacey
2006-10-21 02:55 pm UTC (link)
The ad turning up under her blog entry is totally cracking my shit up!

OMG SHE'S JUS' LIK ANGELINA JOLIEEEE!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: In addition: - [info]tez, 2006-10-21 05:12 pm UTC
Re: In addition: - [info]luthe, 2006-10-22 02:12 am UTC

[info]wankaholic
2006-10-21 04:13 pm UTC (link)
No amount of denial disguised as high self-esteem will hide the fact that she looks like a man.

(Reply to this)


[info]gal_montag
2006-10-21 04:46 pm UTC (link)
"lower [their] standards" and start dating "fat single mothers," "look in the developing world" for women desperate for green-cards, or "improve" themselves as much as she has over the years.

Wow, racist *and* classist. That is some amazing shit right there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-21 05:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-21 09:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-21 10:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2006-10-22 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-22 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-23 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-23 08:50 pm UTC

[info]damnskippy
2006-10-21 05:15 pm UTC (link)
Her listmaking and random estimation of her own IQ reminds me a lot of Peggy Hill. She's not nearly as hot, tho. See?
http://animatedtv.about.com/library/graphics/Bobby_Peggy.jpg

(Reply to this)


[info]missdaisy
2006-10-21 05:24 pm UTC (link)
She's funny. I like that. I think I'll ask her out for a drink and watch her not get hit on.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashes, 2006-10-21 08:42 pm UTC

[info]lovelypoet
2006-10-21 06:12 pm UTC (link)
I’m relatively young (whereas 82% of American adult women are over 30 years old)

Well, let's see... the average life expectancy of an American woman in 79, and we're considered "adult" at 18. Huh. She's right! She must be really, really special!

Ah, fun with completely meaningless statistics.

And didn't anyone tell her that bragging about her IQ on the internet automatically reduces it by fifty points?

(Reply to this)


[info]seeshellirun
2006-10-21 06:34 pm UTC (link)
"It's uncomfortable, a little creepy, somewhat overwhelming, and I want it to stop. "

I can totally see how a long-winded entry about how uh-maze-ing she is and all the qualities that make her oh-so-dry-humpable could be construed as "OMG, STOP!".

(Reply to this)


[info]smo
2006-10-21 06:43 pm UTC (link)
Wow. Does it count as lesbianism if she's in love with herself?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-10-21 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2006-10-23 05:05 am UTC

[info]visp
2006-10-21 06:57 pm UTC (link)
Well, on the bright side, I'm sure this will cut down on her e-suitors - just like she wanted.

(Reply to this)


[info]darkeyes
2006-10-21 07:22 pm UTC (link)
....wow

...that's...that's a mighty big denialego she's hauling around there.

Now I have Ms. Stansfield's song stuck in my head.

"Soul deep is the love I feel for myself
Only I can make me feel this way
And nobody else"

(reposted due to html issues)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-10-22 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkeyes, 2006-10-23 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-10-23 01:46 am UTC

[info]amymccabe
2006-10-21 07:51 pm UTC (link)
Her obvious ignorance of the meaning of the word Bildungsroman is amusing enough. Unless the intent of her blog is to write a fictional novel in the form of diary (blog) entries of a girl coming of age. Somehow I doubt it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gobsmacked, 2006-10-21 08:24 pm UTC

[info]jetamors
2006-10-21 08:33 pm UTC (link)
*smh*

The extensive libertarian bashing on the second half of that Pandagon thread warmed the cockles of my heart, though.

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map