Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Freezer - a buffet of manliness! ([info]freezer) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-11-10 21:09:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*
Current music:"Baby Hold On To Me", Eddie & Gerald Levert

Cute Overload - Enemy of Women
This one's short, but what it lacks in length, it makes up in WTF factor. (With a bonus layer of "Bitch Are You For Real?")

Over at Cute Overload, Head Snorgler In Charge, Meg, posts that CO merited a mention in November issue of Maxim (American verison)

Dewds, we made it as a "Sick Site" on Maxim this month. How H-O-double-T is that? woo! According to Maxim, you should "sneak on to CuteOverload then sit back and aww like a schoolgirl." OK!

For a while, it's all "Oh, how cool" and "Yay Meg" and the obligatory "Cute chicks" joke

Then along comes Tasha (Who's name I swear I've heard WRT other CO wanks):

This is a little disgusting. We've finally reached the point that no site on the web is safe from female degradation.

I came to this site to see pictures of animals, and instead I see Meg participating in female exploitation by posting images of women to treat like meat.


Fave response from NebraskaErin: Pass the kitteh to Tasha, she needs a huff.

And what wank of this type would be complete without a "Right to her opinion" post?

Oh, Cute Overload... even your infighting is cute!




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]the_wanlorn
2006-11-11 04:26 am UTC (link)
I like CO wanks because they remind me to go and check the updates.

OMG PUPPY CIRCLE SQUEEEEEEEEE

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]zyna_kat, 2006-11-11 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-11-11 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiye, 2006-11-11 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-11-11 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-11 08:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2006-11-11 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-11-11 09:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-11-11 05:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 06:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-11-12 06:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-11-12 06:25 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-11-12 06:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 09:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-11-13 11:40 am UTC

[info]ridonkulous
2006-11-11 04:37 am UTC (link)
It will never cease to amaze me how the wankers on CO have the energy to get indignent. I'm reduced to happy ooze within seconds of opening the site, and it's alllll gooooood.

(Reply to this)


[info]shinga
2006-11-11 04:46 am UTC (link)
Man, these people are pissy. They should find something niiiice and calming... like, oh! How about a website full of pictures of adorable animals so they can just look at the cute and--

...

Aw hell. Nevermind.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2006-11-11 09:33 am UTC

[info]khym_chanur
2006-11-11 05:03 am UTC (link)
Pass the kitteh to Tasha, she needs a huff.

The orange ones fuck you up real good.

But speaking about the post itself, Cute Overload gets mentioned in a magazine, so CO posts a picture of the cover of the magazine in question. This is a big deal?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-11-11 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-11-12 04:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2006-11-11 05:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-11-11 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2006-11-11 05:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-11 06:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-11-11 07:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2006-11-12 12:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-11-12 12:52 am UTC

ealusaid
2006-11-11 05:06 am UTC (link)
If that's the Tasha I remember, she's the one behind both priv_elite wank and the "I don't want any orgasm of mine to be associated with my child!" breastfeeding wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-11-11 05:31 am UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2006-11-11 05:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2006-11-12 12:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-11-11 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2006-11-11 05:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-11 06:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-11 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2006-11-11 11:37 pm UTC

[info]wrongly_amused
2006-11-11 05:25 am UTC (link)
Yeah, it kind of sucks that women are viewed as sex objects still, but, y'know what? Nobody held those three women at gun point and made them take that photoshoot. They made the choice to put themselves out there as such.

Try directing the rage at a place where it matters - the society that continues to sponsor such attitudes.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-11-11 05:29 am UTC (link)
Forget the wank! Look at that little sad-faced kitten! I don't even like cats, but oh my god!

(Reply to this)


[info]khym_chanur
2006-11-11 05:48 am UTC (link)
laureling: anacarrot, yes, Tasha has a right to her own opinion, but everyone else has a right to tell her to lighten up or express their opinion about her opinion. That whole freedom of speech thing is a two way street you know. Get your undies out of a twist, it can't be comfy.

Bah, we'll have none of your Earth logic here!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-11-12 04:27 am UTC

[info]blackjackrocket
2006-11-11 06:02 am UTC (link)
In fact, a pic cannot be BOTH sexy and degrading. There's a "positive" sexuality and a "negative" or "degrading" sexuality - the latter automatically translates to sexual crime. No two ways about it.

She's new to the internet, isn't she?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 07:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 07:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 07:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 08:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 08:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 08:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 08:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 08:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 08:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2006-11-11 09:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-11-11 02:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 09:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-11-11 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2006-11-11 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]empy, 2006-11-11 01:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2006-11-11 02:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2006-11-11 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]black_spot, 2006-11-12 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-11-11 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2006-11-11 05:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilte, 2006-11-12 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-11-11 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 07:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]varkias, 2006-11-12 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2006-11-12 09:05 am UTC
*cough* - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 09:54 am UTC
Re: *cough* - [info]ymfaery, 2006-11-12 12:32 pm UTC
To be totally irrelevant... - [info]rosehiptea, 2006-11-11 06:08 pm UTC
Re: To be totally irrelevant... - [info]distractogirl, 2006-11-11 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 03:27 am UTC
Reposting with the correct damn spelling. - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-12 02:23 pm UTC

[info]puipui
2006-11-11 06:38 am UTC (link)
I just want to state for the record that I would never treat a scantily clad hot chick like a piece of meat. Women should never be cooked before eaten.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2006-11-11 07:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-11-11 07:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-11 08:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2006-11-11 10:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-11 02:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-11-12 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibicurmudgeon, 2006-11-13 05:02 am UTC

[info]velvet_mace
2006-11-11 07:41 am UTC (link)
Point of post
<----------
Tasha's Head

This is about their com being PIMPED in a magazine, not about the girls on the front cover (though they also pass the 'cute" muster as far as I'm concerned.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]black_spot, 2006-11-12 12:20 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-11-11 07:50 am UTC (link)
Oh no! It's the evil boobies! Whatever will we do?

~Jessiemouse

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-11-11 08:20 am UTC (link)
Don't cute animals negate any and all attempts of wank? I thought this was a rule!!! *world explodes*

-dustmotes

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2006-11-11 12:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 08:45 pm UTC

[info]caito
2006-11-11 08:29 am UTC (link)
THERE ARE PICTURES OF RATS ON LEASHES LIEKOMGWTFBBQ

Wank? What wank?

(Reply to this)


[info]kittikattie
2006-11-11 09:03 am UTC (link)
Oh, BITCH CAKES.

Dear crazy ass wankers named Tasha: Stop using my name or I will be forced to kill you with my SuperGoth Stare.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2006-11-11 04:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2006-11-11 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amymccabe, 2006-11-12 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-12 08:03 pm UTC
Re: How the hell do you get an account here? - [info]freezer, 2006-11-12 08:42 pm UTC

[info]lottelita
2006-11-11 09:31 am UTC (link)
It's four words, people. Is it really that complicated?

Don't like, don't read.

Or, at greater length:

CUTE OVERLOAD DOES NOT OWE YOU PICTURES OF FUZZY ANIMALS *AND* THE CONFIRMATION OF YOUR POLITICAL VIEWS. CUTE OVERLOAD DOES NOT OWE YOU A DAMN THING. DON'T LIKE? DON'T READ. START YOUR OWN FUCKING CUTE ANIMAL SITE THAT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIES THE PROPER TREATMENT OF EVERY BUNNY AND KITTY FEATURED, AND NEVER EVER SAYS ANYTHING THAT WILL OFFEND ANYONE YOU.

*mops up*

(Reply to this)


[info]napalmnacey
2006-11-11 02:09 pm UTC (link)
Rogue Kitteh is puzzled by the over-blown reaction to the magazine. She shall now go tear up paper, claw people's legs in an attempt to give them kitteh-kisses and be generally charming. Mew!

(Reply to this)


[info]shaggydogstail
2006-11-11 03:18 pm UTC (link)
I think Glitch read my mind:

I think the idea of grown men oohing and ahhing over the cuteness on this site as rather endearing. And hot.

Also, the more stereotypically bloke-ish a man is, the more adorably hot it is when he's reduced to a cooing puddle of squee by the cute widdly kitties, right?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-11-11 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2006-11-12 12:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-11-12 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-11-12 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-12 08:32 pm UTC

[info]annaham
2006-11-11 09:04 pm UTC (link)

This is a little disgusting. We've finally reached the point that no site on the web is safe from female degradation.


The way this sentence is worded makes it sound like she's ranting against web site degredation carried out BY females.
/grammar-police

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2006-11-11 09:36 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-11-11 11:15 pm UTC (link)
Heh, for a moment I was thinking "Wow, not even cute Overload can calm Ginmar down. . ."


But then I realized that there weren't enough caps and calling people trolls.

(Reply to this)


[info]entelodont
2006-11-11 11:47 pm UTC (link)
I think part of the frustration and dissapointment with some of the "viewers" here is that they consider CO to be the only site they can go to to escape the ugliness of every day existence, which does include being assaulted with hyper-sexual imagery, etc.

Their warm and pink safe place has just been violated!

Oh. Damn. Sorry about that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2006-11-13 02:47 am UTC

[info]mcity
2006-11-12 12:48 am UTC (link)
1. Now I'm imagining a puppy in a bikini in front of a fireplace.
2. You know, if everyone in the world was so concerned about being mentioned in the same breath as something arguably disagreeable, we'd have a lot less Republicans. And Christians. And Texans. And people named "Bush".

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-13 01:20 pm UTC

[info]saralina25
2006-11-12 03:04 am UTC (link)
Pass the kitteh to Tasha, she needs a huff.

Pass her mine. Sure, she looks all cute, but the scars on my arms from "play time" tell me she's one evil bitch.

Note to self: never name a cat Lina again. EVER.

(Reply to this)


[info]aerobot
2006-11-12 08:09 am UTC (link)
I don't know why people expect CO to be a perfect happy place that never contains anything not G-rated and dares to remind them of the outside world. Yeah, CO is good for a moment of escapism, but it's not freaking Disney.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-15 06:11 am UTC

[info]elemcee
2006-11-12 10:21 pm UTC (link)
Is she talking about that little picture of the front cover?


'Cause, anyone who finds the pictures on CO sexy is probably not the same breed as one who reads Maxim, I would have thought.

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map