Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



aerobot ([info]aerobot) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-11-16 22:34:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Cute Overload? AGAIN?
Man, again? How the hell does the cute cause so much WANK?

Anyway, there's a new pic of a cats n' racks pic, showing a kitten being smooshed into teh cleavage.

KABOOM. 300 posts and COUNTING.



This post is very indecent, and it promotes acceptance of soft-core pornography. Inadvertently promoting this kind of material is shameful since it is not the intention or purpose of this site as far as I know. Cute animals should be the emphasis rather than people's selfish attempts to bolster their vanity. This is a site that many proud Americans enjoy with their children, and these kinds of postings are a disgrace. I will be sure to never recommend this site to anyone again if this trend continues.

Soft-core? SOFT-CORE!? If cleavage is soft-core, then I see free porn every time I go outside! I've also been an unwitting porn star all this time and never known it! Dammit, where's my money?

Great! And I just got done telling a friend that this is a great site to introduce his little girls to. And that kittie looks a little ruffed up by those big girls. Poor baby.

Because boobs are scary to little girls. Just wait until they grow their own.

yeah, skanky is never cute. boo for staged cats&racks! in that one pic from a few months ago, u could see her nipple. kits r cute, nips r not :)

Cleavage = skank. Yikes, button up your tops, ladies!

Whatever, if you want to snuggle that close to your cat, that's all well and good. just keep it in your own house.When you take it out of context it looks like you are deliberately sticking a cat in your boob, when you are probably just cuddling with it. but i agree that this was obviously staged.

Keep your snorgling inside your home! It's indecent!

Y'know, I'm not convinced that that kitten is happy in that position. I think it looks a little worried, actually. I guess I would be, too, if I had two boulders from Jungle Hunt hurtling down at my poor wittle head. Don't worry, kitten, I'll rescue you and snuggle you until you regain yourself!

... CHARMIMG.

I'm hoping this sort of stuff stays off this site. I see too much of this crap everywhere else I go, I come here because of the innocence it evokes, just looking at the cute, not someone slutting it up for the camera.

Yeah, you can't even see her face or body, and only part of her boobs, but she's a OMG SLUT. Um.

Yes for those who lecture us on that their just boobs, I would say, whatever happened to modesty? This is supposed to be a fun sight....not a sight where we have to use NSFW.....

To all you libertines, their are millions of porn sites if that is what you need.....I would hope that a sight like CO would stay family friendly!!


I swear, if I never hear the word 'modesty' again, I will die a happy woman.

There is also some fighting between CatFreak, Annie, and other members about prudishness and the partiarchy and American culture. Thankfully, there are also many comments from sane people saying that boobs are not the end of the world, STFU.

Also, there's a kitten in there somewhere.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-11-16 01:15 pm UTC (link)
Ahh oh noo! Sacks of fat attached to a rib cage! Ooh won't someone PLEASE think of the children!

Come on, people! It's not like there's full frontal nudity. And besides, cute kitten!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladyvorkosigan, 2006-11-16 01:57 pm UTC

[info]oxydosic
2006-11-16 01:27 pm UTC (link)
I don't care for the picture simply because I think the kitten looks like he's about to be squished in the boobies, but geez people. It's just cleavage, the boobs are fully covered. Though some might consider it NSFW since it's so...extreme closeup. But still, you can see she's wearing a top!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2006-11-16 05:54 pm UTC

[info]singe
2006-11-16 02:04 pm UTC (link)
Bonus childfree wank attempt: Someone whined about the recent picture of a chocolate lab mouthing a baby's foot. Ew yuck barf stupid babies etc. Which was nicely balanced by O GOD THAT DOG IS ATTACKING A BABY!!1!

As for the boob pic, the kittie does look a little squished but I don't think there's a need to call the ASPCA. Or the Morality Police.

Can CO post anything that doesn't bring a complaint?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2006-11-16 02:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2006-11-18 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2006-11-18 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2006-11-16 02:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-11-16 05:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]paintobscura, 2006-11-16 05:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-11-16 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]girl_friday, 2006-11-16 06:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-16 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mertonfanatic, 2006-11-16 07:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-11-17 04:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mertonfanatic, 2006-11-17 04:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 04:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 06:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-11-17 11:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2006-11-18 04:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 10:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-17 02:34 pm UTC
Awwwww! - [info]singe, 2006-11-18 03:42 am UTC

[info]luna_hoshino
2006-11-16 02:09 pm UTC (link)
Mmm, kittens and boobs.

... wait, there's wank?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]girl_friday, 2006-11-16 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2006-11-16 09:41 pm UTC
the pics are like that optical illusion...
(Anonymous)
2006-11-16 02:41 pm UTC (link)
...where you can only see either the two faces or the vase, but never both together.

Now it's a kitten, now it's cleavage. Kitten, cleavage, kitten, cleavage...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: the pics are like that optical illusion... - [info]paintobscura, 2006-11-16 03:20 pm UTC
Re: the pics are like that optical illusion... - [info]caito, 2006-11-16 06:09 pm UTC

[info]bubosquared
2006-11-16 02:50 pm UTC (link)
many proud Americans

This would be where I stopped reading. What, only Americans are on the internets? No, wait, I know, it's just that the rest of us heathens expose our kids to porn from birth and just let them loose on the internet cause we don't care, right?

(Also, for all that hubbub, I was at least expecting a nipple, you know. I feel cheated.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2006-11-16 03:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2006-11-16 03:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]polygamouse, 2006-11-16 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chrome327, 2006-11-16 04:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flowerstar, 2006-11-16 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-17 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2006-11-17 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-17 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-11-17 11:45 am UTC

[info]caito
2006-11-16 03:08 pm UTC (link)
Oh, Cats 'n' Racks. At least CO doesn't post cute pictures that make a play on the word "pussy".

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gobsmacked, 2006-11-16 09:21 pm UTC

[info]moljn
2006-11-16 03:17 pm UTC (link)
While I'm bi, I'm not generally a breast girl, but damn, those look pretty.

(wank, what wank?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-16 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2006-11-16 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-16 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-11-18 01:21 am UTC

[info]lady7jane
2006-11-16 03:23 pm UTC (link)
Kitties need their milk, and formula is bad for them.

(Reply to this)


[info]sharps
2006-11-16 03:41 pm UTC (link)
This picture is, like, visual heaven. It's got tits and it's got a kitten. What more could you want?

Though frankly the kitten looks very slightly worried. I would have like it to be a smiley kitten. They should have stuck a Scottish Fold in the cleavage - they alawys look smiley. At least on CO. When they're not having a bath.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2006-11-16 05:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]paintobscura, 2006-11-16 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-11-18 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gobsmacked, 2006-11-16 09:24 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-11-16 04:00 pm UTC (link)
Huhwhat? I happen to think those are very nice, very covered breasts that by the way are not hurting that kitten in the slightest. Cats like to rub their faces against things. Two of mine, for example, adore feet. Now, if cats will smoosh themselves against human feet, why the hell can't they do the same with breasts, which are softer and smell better?

...Oh wait, I'm using Earth logic, aren't I? *wanders away to stare at kitten and boobies*

-lucy_fell

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2006-11-16 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 06:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2006-11-16 06:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 07:39 pm UTC

[info]napalmnacey
2006-11-16 04:05 pm UTC (link)
Hah! See, my first thought on seeing that picture in my mailbox was, "How I want to BE that kitten!" That kitten is one lucky suvvabitch.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]peachespig, 2006-11-16 05:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-17 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]peachespig, 2006-11-17 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-17 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvoldything, 2006-11-17 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-16 07:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-17 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-17 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-17 03:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-17 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-17 06:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-17 06:46 am UTC

[info]sashenka
2006-11-16 04:45 pm UTC (link)
The Taliban would like you to cover yourself and be ashamed. That is all.

(Reply to this)


[info]caffeine_fairy
2006-11-16 05:07 pm UTC (link)
When did breasts become not child-safe?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2006-11-16 06:06 pm UTC
Re: breastmilk bukkake - [info]girl_friday, 2006-11-16 06:51 pm UTC
Re: breastmilk bukkake - [info]caito, 2006-11-17 12:56 am UTC
Re: breastmilk bukkake - (Anonymous), 2006-11-17 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - catatonia, 2006-11-17 08:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-11-17 11:52 am UTC

[info]rolling_my_eyes
2006-11-16 05:10 pm UTC (link)
Someone needs to tell these morons that Cute Overload is Meg's thing and she can post whatever the fuck she wants.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2006-11-16 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rolling_my_eyes, 2006-11-16 05:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]paintobscura, 2006-11-16 06:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pointandlaugh, 2006-11-17 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2006-11-16 10:50 pm UTC

[info]llama_treats
2006-11-16 05:18 pm UTC (link)
For some reason, the phrase "cats 'n racks" makes me think of beatniks with guns.

(Reply to this)


[info]peachespig
2006-11-16 05:21 pm UTC (link)
I'm unable to decide whether those pictures deeply offend me or not. I think I need to see several dozen more before I can make up my mind.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2006-11-16 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]peachespig, 2006-11-16 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2006-11-16 09:05 pm UTC

iwanttobeasleep
2006-11-16 05:55 pm UTC (link)
I can kind of sort of see how that might be NSFW, since it is a close up of breasts, but I think if your boss can't understand "I'm on break and I was looking at this site that usually just has pictures of fuzzy kittens, and I don't control what they put up, so you can't blame me" you probably should find something else to do during down time.

(Reply to this)


[info]solle
2006-11-16 06:36 pm UTC (link)
Cleavage = skank. Yikes, button up your tops, ladies!

Erm, yes, actually.

Not that being a skank is a bad thing, mind. ;)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-17 03:31 am UTC

[info]okalintu
2006-11-16 07:09 pm UTC (link)
But what if a kitten is held against a flat man-chest? Would it be as offensive then? Or is it just quite attractive packages of fat that are bad?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-16 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]okalintu, 2006-11-16 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-16 07:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]okalintu, 2006-11-16 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-17 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wickedwitch, 2006-11-17 10:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-16 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2006-11-17 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]okalintu, 2006-11-17 09:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]drhenryjekyll, 2006-11-17 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]okalintu, 2006-11-17 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenglass, 2006-11-16 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-16 07:35 pm UTC
Bob had bitch-tits. - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 11:39 pm UTC

[info]tez
2006-11-16 07:16 pm UTC (link)
I will admit I had to click away fairly quickly. That was mostly so I didn't have to explain to my prudish and somewhat elderly coworkers why I was drooling all over my keyboard. Lucky cat.

(Reply to this)


[info]sarracenia
2006-11-16 07:20 pm UTC (link)
Dear people who think that cats are terrified of breasts:

They're not. Really. My cat views mine as either steps to my shoulder, or good pillows. Or occasionally as the only thing that's stopping him from falling off my shoulder when I'm being particularly mean to him.

Now I'm kind of tempted to take a picture of my cat on my breasts and send it into CO just to piss off the wankers.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]atalantapendrag, 2006-11-16 07:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 10:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2006-11-17 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wickedwitch, 2006-11-17 10:07 pm UTC

[info]hallidae
2006-11-16 07:34 pm UTC (link)
Jesus God. You'd think the girl was using her boobs to jack off the cat the way some of the commentors are reacting.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2006-11-17 10:35 pm UTC

[info]viralmemory
2006-11-16 08:21 pm UTC (link)
The accusations of "ZOMG Staged!!11" crack me up, because a picture is spontaneously taken every time my cat gets near my breasts.

srsly.

(Reply to this)


[info]oar
2006-11-16 08:25 pm UTC (link)
This reminds me of the best Onion article ever.

Make sure you scroll down to see the drawings.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-16 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-16 09:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-11-17 12:00 pm UTC
Icon! - [info]lottelita, 2006-11-17 09:15 pm UTC
Re: Icon! - (Anonymous), 2006-11-17 10:20 pm UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map