Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



sequinedlizard ([info]sequinedlizard) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-11-17 20:59:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:amused

You will all go to bed without beatings!
In dot_bdsm_snark, ADevotedSlave posts what starts out as a promising snark of people who get too happy with Photoshop when posting photos online. However, they apparently (bum bum BUMMM) snarking for revenge! (oooooo)

ThomasKattus reveals that it is him in the pictures and claims that it's not fair! to choose just those pictures. He says at least he doesn't have cock shots up (point for him).

Apparently, ADevotedSlave took issue with ThomasKattus' previous post and decided to track him down and make fun of him. DevotedSlave's supporters include:

I speak in third person because my master tells me to (from bella_di_vil)

and

You're all meanies (from kaya_s)

Highlights include:

"I'd like you to open http://www.m-w.com for just a minute.
Now.In the field beside "Dictionary" please type the word "hyperbole" for me. Press enter.
Okay, you got what that word means? Now hit the back button. Delete "hyperbole" from the field and replace it with the word "sarcasm". Press enter.
Got that too? Okay, back button again. This time we're looking up "stereotypes".
Last time, I swear. Look up "satire".
You are now fully ready to comment in here and not look like a complete dork. You're welcome."

from Kwanboa, here

and

Well, first off, let me make it clear (because I can see how it woul be confused) that I am saying it is a conceit, as in a fanciful notion, not conceited, as in snobbish or self-important. One uses the word conceit to refer to excessively flowery language choices, that is what I am doing here.

That said, I think the refering to yourself in the third person bit is silly, I've always thought it was silly. The fact that your master ordered you to do it just means that I think you and your master are engaging in a silly practice. This is why we have snark communities, so we can make fun of the things people do which we think are silly.


by Ipsafictura

Children, don't make me turn this internet around!



(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-11-18 03:16 am UTC (link)
'Bout time they wanked. ;D

-Turk_Elena

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tez
2006-11-18 03:20 am UTC (link)
This ain't the first time, babe, believe you me. *squishes*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-18 03:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-18 06:36 am UTC

[info]tez
2006-11-18 03:21 am UTC (link)
Nothing makes me snicker quite like a wanker trying to play that s/h/it is snarkier than thou. It is amusing.

(Reply to this)


[info]smo
2006-11-18 04:07 am UTC (link)
(pssss, "us" is considered a 1st person pronoun)

O how I LOL'D.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]semirecluse
2006-11-18 04:27 am UTC (link)
XD Ditto.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2006-11-18 11:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-18 07:26 pm UTC

eviemouse
2006-11-18 07:21 am UTC (link)
That's why she seems to use Us/us in her writings... which doesn't exactly make her look more clever.

I clicked through some links, and she is selling stories and photos on her website. I have to say that the fact this test she seems to have created tests if someone is "compatable" with her and her master should not encourage customers.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]exdee
2006-11-18 05:29 pm UTC (link)
We are not amused.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2006-11-18 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-18 07:28 pm UTC

[info]quettaser
2006-11-18 04:10 am UTC (link)
Stop this. This is getting very, very silly now. Very silly indeed!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]smo
2006-11-18 04:13 am UTC (link)
On second thought, let us not go to dot_bdsm_snark. It is a silly place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-11-18 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-11-18 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-18 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]zinkchan, 2006-11-18 05:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-11-18 03:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-11-18 07:38 pm UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2006-11-18 04:13 am UTC (link)
What can I say? There was not one smiley, not one 'lol'

and

I wonder if there is a snarking community for snarking people who think snarking is fun. Now that would be interesting.

Oh, dear. Kaya_s isn't very bright, is she?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]smo
2006-11-18 04:16 am UTC (link)
No, she really isn't. It's quite funny tragic, really. I chortle weep with laughter on her behalf.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tez
2006-11-18 05:01 am UTC (link)
She is the burned-out bulb on the Christmas-tree-light string of snark.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-11-18 05:38 am UTC (link)
The interesting thing- I think there is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]zinkchan
2006-11-18 05:46 am UTC (link)
So...snarky posts have to have a smiley and a lol in them now?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-19 03:42 am UTC

[info]wrongly_amused
2006-11-18 07:38 am UTC (link)
No sub bashing, plz.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]annabelle_lee
2006-11-18 07:51 am UTC (link)
Why would you want to ruin a perfectly tasty sub like that?

Oh, wait. Wrong sub. [facepalms]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wrongly_amused, 2006-11-18 08:13 am UTC

[info]krazycat
2006-11-18 09:53 pm UTC (link)
but I hear they like that sort of thing..

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2006-11-18 07:39 am UTC (link)
They're getting so tied in knots. Not at all proper for a BDSM comm.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]keri, 2006-11-18 08:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-11-18 08:25 am UTC

[info]teruhiko
2006-11-18 07:46 am UTC (link)
I speak in third person because my master tells me to (from bella_di_vil)

The master approves...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-11-18 08:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2006-11-18 09:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-18 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-18 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hickorydickory, 2006-11-19 09:24 pm UTC

[info]pokecheck
2006-11-18 10:06 am UTC (link)
I can only imagine her speaking in third person with, you know, The Rock's voice.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-18 02:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2006-11-18 02:56 pm UTC

[info]issendai
2006-11-18 04:20 pm UTC (link)
From the post that sparked the wanked post:

Actually, "dominant" is most commonly used as an adjective or adverb, not as a noun. Saying "I am dominant" is as grammatically incorrect as saying "I am girl" or "I am dominate". You are the dominant male, not a dominant.

Man, Kaya's just a big bundle of Very Special grammatical win, isn't she?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-19 03:46 am UTC

[info]napalmnacey
2006-11-18 04:25 pm UTC (link)
No beatings with dinner?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2006-11-18 09:55 pm UTC

[info]ladyvorkosigan
2006-11-18 05:21 pm UTC (link)
Do I want to ask why making people speak in the third person about themselves on-line* is a standard order from doms? Is it just that they have a hard-fought mission to annoy everyone who comes into contact with them or is there something more there?

Also, is "this girl" really third person?

* I'm assuming it's on-line only or in certain circle because I'm assuming she doesn't go around referring to herself in the third person at work. Grey's Anatomy notwithstanding.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-11-18 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2006-11-19 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2006-11-19 07:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-11-20 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-19 02:21 am UTC

[info]runrunmarch
2006-11-18 10:56 pm UTC (link)
Wait, so judging by that post, I'm required to have a clean house to be a Member In Good Standing of the BDSM kink community?

I'm fucked. Between the parrot and the books scattered everywhere, well..

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-11-19 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]runrunmarch, 2006-11-19 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-11-20 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2006-11-19 09:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]runrunmarch, 2006-11-19 10:25 am UTC

[info]gal_montag
2006-11-19 10:53 pm UTC (link)
I speak in third person because my master tells me to

Is that for serious? Because, I mean... does he also make her do the Hoeky Pokey?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ayezur, 2006-11-19 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2006-11-20 12:09 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map