Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



entrenous88 ([info]entrenous88) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2006-12-14 16:45:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I sincerely hope that the spirits of drowned polar bears come HAUNT him while he sleeps!
Splooge located via bookslut.

Best-selling novelist Michael Crichton doesn't just get mad when his critics disparage his adamant view that there is no proof of global warming.

Nope, he gets even, by portraying critic Michael Crowley in his next novel as Mick Crowley, a small-dicked rapist who gets uncontrollable urges for kids still in their diapers.


Last March, Michael Crowley wrote an article in The New Republic attacking Michael Crichton's unpopular (and supported only by highly questionable research) contention that global warming is a crock.

When Crowley picked up Crichton's next novel (appropriately entitled Next), he discovered a character named Mick Crowley, who rapes a baby boy still in diapers, tearing the child's rectum even though his penis *is* very eensy.

Key details of the character Mick Crowley's background neatly correspond with the real-life experiences of critic Michale Crowley. From Next:

The defendant, thirty-year-old Mick Crowley, was a Washington-based political columnist who was visiting his sister-in-law when he experienced an overwhelming urge to have anal sex with her young son, still in diapers. Crowley was a wealthy, spoiled Yale graduate and heir to a pharmaceutical fortune. ...



Now Crowley has responded on The New Republic's website, with a slightly humorous take on the situation:

The next page contains fleeting references to Crowley as a "weasel" and a "dickhead," and, later, "that political reporter who likes little boys." But that's it--Crowley comes and goes without affecting the plot. He is not a character so much as a voodoo doll. Knowing that Crichton had used prior books to attack very real-seeming people, I was suspicious. Who was this Mick Crowley? A Google search turned up an Irish Workers Party politician in Knocknaheeny, Ireland. But Crowley's tireless advocacy for County Cork's disabled seemed to make him an unlikely target of Crichton's ire. And that's when it dawned on me: I happen to be a Washington political journalist. And, yes, I did attend Yale University. And, come to think of it, I had recently written a critical 3,700-word cover story about Crichton. In lieu of a letter to the editor, Crichton had fictionalized me as a child rapist. And, perhaps worse, falsely branded me a pharmaceutical-industry profiteer.

The commenters at TPMmuckraker, where the situation is reported, let loose at Crichton:


The sick part about it is that Michael Crichton is actually also a pedophile. But what's really unusual is that he prefers being on the receiving end.

* * *

Chrichton makes O. J. look good.

* * *

Until I read this, I didn't know who M Crichton was. I do now. What a girl!

* * *

Why is it that the only people that fantasize about raping little boys are Republicans?

* * *

I sincerely hope that the spirits of drowned polar bears come HAUNT him while he sleeps!



One poster, Marian Simms, defends Crichton, noting:

Crichton's little word war with Crowley seems sort of juvenile but I've enjoyed too many of his books to just accept Crowley's side of the story.


To which Éric McComber responds:

I see Crichton's PR firm has shown up. Nice to see you Marian.


For the win, see gonzone, who notes:

Well, if this doesn't make everyone take Michael Crichton's views on global warming seriously, I don't know what will.



Page 2 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]girlneedsagun
2006-12-15 06:44 am UTC (link)
Such maturity. So...when are Crichton and Rice going to co-write something?

(Reply to this)


[info]kahrohseh
2006-12-15 08:46 am UTC (link)
Man. I've had a half-finished copy of Sphere on my shelf for years. (I am the only one on the face of the planet who apparently liked the movie and I Needed To Know More! but not with any real urgency, I guess.) Does this mean I have to foreswear it forever out of principle?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]aristaea
2006-12-15 12:18 pm UTC (link)
I always thought Sphere had a rather cop-out ending. Like Andromeda Strain. But, like you, I never got to the end of the book; I only got to the end of the movie, and both bored me to tears.

Read Congo instead. It's like Gorillas in the Mist 2: Revenge of the Apes. Rocks fall, almost everyone dies. Good times.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]b_jellybean
2006-12-15 12:34 pm UTC (link)
Oh Andromeda Strain. I loved that book all the way until the ending got seriously bullshit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]miss_eponine
2006-12-15 03:17 pm UTC (link)
I threw the book across the room when I finished it. The ending was such a massive cop-out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eisoj5
2006-12-15 03:43 pm UTC (link)
When I read Sphere the first time, I thought, "Oh, okay, they all forgot, how nice."

The second time, a few years later, I thought, "Oh, wait, BETH, WHAT?!"

That messed with my head pretty severely.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kahrohseh, 2006-12-15 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aaron_agonistes, 2006-12-16 08:46 pm UTC

[info]the_mouse
2006-12-15 07:14 pm UTC (link)
Ooooh, I read the book but never saw the movie. I like the ending in the book though. Sphere is probably the one I liked most out of all of his books.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kahrohseh
2006-12-15 08:39 pm UTC (link)
I found the movie interesting because it seemed strangely... literary? And thus naturally drew me to the book. But at the time I mostly had the attention span required to digest an Animorphs, so there it still languishes with the bookmark in the middle...

[info]eisoj5 mentioned something concerning Beth with respect to the ending. Do you know what she's talking about? o_o I only know the movie ending, and even then, it's been a while.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]minibalrogmum, 2006-12-16 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tachikoma01, 2006-12-16 04:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_mouse, 2006-12-16 06:31 pm UTC

[info]notjo
2006-12-15 01:24 pm UTC (link)
O.o?

....

He did what?

(Reply to this)

Well here's MY question:
[info]lindentreeisle
2006-12-15 03:44 pm UTC (link)
Doesn't his publisher have lawyers? I mean, I understood that publishing houses tended to be extremely anal about letting works of fiction go out with the names of real people in them, much less thinly-veiled caricatures that accuse the author's personal enemies of being child rapists? Or do they think a journalist who thinks the author is a total prat is less likely to sue than some random member of the public whose name was accidentally used?

*boggle*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Well here's MY question:
[info]eljuno
2006-12-15 11:09 pm UTC (link)
He called him Mick! It should be okay! Totally not the same person!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Well here's MY question:
[info]rosehiptea
2006-12-16 01:42 am UTC (link)
I've actually heard that even small changes like that could theoretically legally protect an author. But I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on the internet. (And in this case I hope it's not true because I think this was a really effed up thing to do.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2006-12-15 04:35 pm UTC (link)
*sniff*
And Congo was such a good book even though they made a REALLY shitty movie out of it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ghostmaster
2006-12-20 04:04 am UTC (link)
But Bruce Campbell was in it! He makes everything better!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]alexielnet
2006-12-15 05:42 pm UTC (link)
That child molesting, Washington-based political columnist was no chicken...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]isntitironic
2006-12-15 05:50 pm UTC (link)
This was no chicken... this was EVIL MANIFEST!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kelmendi
2006-12-16 01:04 am UTC (link)
I have a freshly baked interweb just for you!.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]octavia
2006-12-16 02:54 am UTC (link)
Got sidetracked by the original article:

There is an obscure publishing doctrine known as "the small penis rule." As described in a 1998 New York Times article, it is a sly trick employed by authors who have defamed someone to discourage their targets from filing lawsuits. As libel lawyer Leon Friedman explained to the Times, "No male is going to come forward and say, 'That character with a very small penis, 'That's me!'" (link)

Heh. Learn something new every day.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]isntitironic
2006-12-16 04:57 pm UTC (link)
I think the 'Small Man Rule' needs to be immortalized in Jurisimprudence.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chez_moi
2006-12-16 01:10 pm UTC (link)
I cannot remember the last time I thoroughly enjoyed a wank so much.

Well, except for that night with the drowned polar bear... but we don't talk about that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2006-12-16 09:29 pm UTC (link)
We do not speak of the polar bears now?

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Dear Mr. Crichton
[info]frequentmouse
2006-12-17 05:31 pm UTC (link)
So, this year has broken the records for heat, cold, wind speed and wettest month, day, and "single rainfall event" (nearly 19 inches in 36 hours at Paradise on Mt. Rainier) in my area; Mt. Rainier National Park has been eroded into unusability, and I spent a couple of days off-line because of no power or broadband, and I'm in the luckier part of the storm zone.

Nice to know everything's normal.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Dear Mr. Crichton
[info]marciamarcia
2006-12-18 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Here in Minnesota, it was 40 degrees yesterday. Also, we have no snow. None. But, apparently, all those stories grown-ups tell me about how cold and snowy it was here when they were kids is just silly fiction. Clearly, Minnesota always had a comfortable winter climate. That's why we built those skywalks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Dear Mr. Crichton
[info]rock_ore
2006-12-18 10:12 pm UTC (link)
See, I was told when I moved to northern Minnesota that I would be freezing my ass off in negative degree weather by the end of November or something. Yeah, so let's talk about that rain less than a week ago.

(we should not even mention Alaska where I lived until this fall nor the fact that the last five winters have been insanely warm and that there was more rain than snow and the average temp was somewhere between 30 and 20 degrees F. Really.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lunarkettle
2006-12-18 06:17 am UTC (link)
My mind is kind of blown at how many commentors to that blog entry don't recognize sarcasm. One horrified "but pedophiles are worse than pharmaceutical profiteers!" would be easy to write off as a lone dummy, but there are half a dozen comments like that.

(Reply to this)



Page 2 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map