|
|
amymccabe (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} amymccabe) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank,@ 2006-12-20 09:48:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Meg Oppresses CO with Boobs, part 3423456432
This time it is a parakeet peaking out of fictional cleavage (the lady in the post is about as flat chested as I am). For those complaining about the mighty power of the boob, I ask, what boob?
Parkeet & "Rack"
Sarah posts: this whole putting animals in your shirt thing is stupid. and not cute. (Apparently Sarah also objects to capital letters.)
Mona posts: I agree with Sarah. I think this is tacky. In some ways it takes away from the innocence of the bird.
To which Arvay replies for the win: I agree with Mona. Boobs take away the innocence of things that would otherwise be so cute and sweet. Mothers should stop breastfeeding. It totally destroys the cute babies, to expose them to breasts.
I have to admit, the ongoing pets 'n racks controversy never fails to entertain me.
This time it is a parakeet peaking out of fictional cleavage (the lady in the post is about as flat chested as I am). For those complaining about the mighty power of the boob, I ask, what boob?
Parkeet & "Rack"
Sarah posts: this whole putting animals in your shirt thing is stupid. and not cute. (Apparently Sarah also objects to capital letters.)
Mona posts: I agree with Sarah. I think this is tacky. In some ways it takes away from the innocence of the bird.
To which Arvay replies for the win: I agree with Mona. Boobs take away the innocence of things that would otherwise be so cute and sweet. Mothers should stop breastfeeding. It totally destroys the cute babies, to expose them to breasts.
I have to admit, the ongoing pets 'n racks controversy never fails to entertain me.
Post a comment in response:
