|
|
dracothelizard (dracothelizard) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank,@ 2006-12-24 02:26:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I'm sure the Daily Mail has excellent journalists which aren't idiots, but this man doesn't seem to be one of them.
Okay, yes, so I'm biased. Sue me :p.
He's written an article on the murdered prostitutes in Ipswich, and thinks that being strangled to death is an occupational hazard for prostitutes.
"That doesn't make it justifiable homicide, but in the scheme of things the deaths of these five women is no great loss.
They weren't going to discover a cure for cancer or embark on missionary work in Darfur. The only kind of missionary position they undertook was in the back seat of a car."
He's got 80 reader comments already, ranging from "On form as usual John,keep writing for the silent majority." to "What a sad commentary. You diminish the loss of these young women because of their lifestyle ? What a LITTLE mind you have!"
So... plenty of wank! Over dead prostitutes! How... appropriate.
Okay, yes, so I'm biased. Sue me :p.
He's written an article on the murdered prostitutes in Ipswich, and thinks that being strangled to death is an occupational hazard for prostitutes.
"That doesn't make it justifiable homicide, but in the scheme of things the deaths of these five women is no great loss.
They weren't going to discover a cure for cancer or embark on missionary work in Darfur. The only kind of missionary position they undertook was in the back seat of a car."
He's got 80 reader comments already, ranging from "On form as usual John,keep writing for the silent majority." to "What a sad commentary. You diminish the loss of these young women because of their lifestyle ? What a LITTLE mind you have!"
So... plenty of wank! Over dead prostitutes! How... appropriate.
Post a comment in response:
