Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nevada Fighter ([info]nevadafighter) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-01-06 12:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I HAV YUR IP IM GONNA GET YOUUUUU!1!!!
Found by way of stupid_free but this is too damn funny not to share.

softest_fire posts to caninecentral hoping to find someone with a female German shepherd that she can breed with (her dog, not her). First comment out points out how many dogs are killed in shelters because no one wants them and how she's just going to contribute to the problem.

[info]softest_fire then proceeds to wank so hard she nearly breaks something off. Later on when someone makes a very polite, nice comment, she bites that person's head off as well.

Highlights:

- continuous incoherence and lack of grammar
- continuous lack of any kind of sense
- continuous threats that she knows people's IPs and will use that information to "get" them
- continuous threats that she has a lawyer and has contacted LJ legal and if they continue to contact her (in a public community post), she'll GET THEM!!

Userinfo says she's 28 but frankly it's like watching a bitchy 12 year-old having a total meltdown. Fun times.

EDIT: As others have pointed it, it took nine months for the responses to take off, and the wank isn't all [info]softest_fire's; some of the comm members have their moments of batshit as well.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]miss_eponine
2007-01-06 08:19 pm UTC (link)
What I don't understand is why the first person to respond had to post links to all sorts of tasteless pictures as if she/he was really trying to help. I mean, wouldn't it have been possible to politely explain why home breeding is a bad thing? The links could still have been posted but with a warning.

Granted, she probably would have responded in the same way judging from her other responses, but that was just unnecessary.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]semirecluse
2007-01-06 08:24 pm UTC (link)
I'm thinking that the shock value was the point.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]miss_eponine
2007-01-06 08:29 pm UTC (link)
Yeah. I just keep hoping people wouldn't do things like that. I should probably give up on that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]thesilentsenshi
2007-01-07 12:30 am UTC (link)
At least it was links and not just posting the images. *thinks on that spammer at stupid_free who was posting nude images. In the Nazi wank a few days ago. *goes off for brain bleach*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]thesilentsenshi
2007-01-07 12:32 am UTC (link)
Oh and I didn't mean to say that excuses it, because it doesn't, it just makes me more willing to click the wank. xD I clicked on the other one out of curiosity... I don't think I will again. >_>; I've learned and will head the warnings of fellow F_W members.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]thesilentsenshi
2007-01-07 12:33 am UTC (link)
*heed Gah, my spelling is so off today. ^^;;

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]miss_eponine
2007-01-07 02:16 am UTC (link)
I get what you mean. Spamming tasteless links is marginally better than spamming tasteless images.

Still abominably rude, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]thesilentsenshi
2007-01-07 03:46 am UTC (link)
If it wasn't abominably rude, then it wouldn't have ended up here, and we wouldn't even be discussing it. xD

(Reply to this)(Parent)


smirnoffmule
2007-01-06 08:29 pm UTC (link)
I agree. I think it's very likely the first person to respond wasn't trying to help at all, she was trying to win. She's pretty much made sure that softest_fire will now never go near an animal shelter again in her life because she thinks all the people who work there will throw dead puppies in her face. There are far more mature and effective ways to try and engage with someone if you actually want to change their mind and y'know, actually help some animals or something crazy like that. Shock tactics, hurling insults, alienating people, ganging up on them and spreading snark all over the internet may make you look cool and feel better, but it doesn't help the shelter puppies one little bit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]squib
2007-01-07 12:56 am UTC (link)
She's pretty much made sure that softest_fire will now never go near an animal shelter again in her life because she thinks all the people who work there will throw dead puppies in her face.

I feel that one. I think a lot of animal rescuers need to decide between wanting to place their animals and having the satisfaction of doing the "YOU DON'T DESERVE TO LOOK AT ANIMALS, YOU H0R!" routine with people over really minor things.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]azawakh
2007-01-06 08:33 pm UTC (link)
I agree, and, while the OP appears to be a bit unhinged anyway, it might've tainted her reaction to the one polite post in the whole thread. When you've had dead animals thrown in your face under the guise of answering the ad, you're gonna be a bit cautious about clicking anything else.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]katarin
2007-01-06 09:41 pm UTC (link)
Agreed wholeheartedly, if the OP wasn't the wankiest ho to ever wank I might ahve actually skipped over her histrionics entirely to focus on what an ASSHAT the people commenting are. Because I have NO CLUE how randomly jumping on one girl with a posse of your friends in any way helps save dogs and cats.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map