Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nevada Fighter ([info]nevadafighter) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-01-06 12:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I HAV YUR IP IM GONNA GET YOUUUUU!1!!!
Found by way of stupid_free but this is too damn funny not to share.

softest_fire posts to caninecentral hoping to find someone with a female German shepherd that she can breed with (her dog, not her). First comment out points out how many dogs are killed in shelters because no one wants them and how she's just going to contribute to the problem.

[info]softest_fire then proceeds to wank so hard she nearly breaks something off. Later on when someone makes a very polite, nice comment, she bites that person's head off as well.

Highlights:

- continuous incoherence and lack of grammar
- continuous lack of any kind of sense
- continuous threats that she knows people's IPs and will use that information to "get" them
- continuous threats that she has a lawyer and has contacted LJ legal and if they continue to contact her (in a public community post), she'll GET THEM!!

Userinfo says she's 28 but frankly it's like watching a bitchy 12 year-old having a total meltdown. Fun times.

EDIT: As others have pointed it, it took nine months for the responses to take off, and the wank isn't all [info]softest_fire's; some of the comm members have their moments of batshit as well.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]nicolae
2007-01-07 03:06 am UTC (link)
Well, obviously not spaying one's dog is not the same thing as beating one's children, but both are individual choices. Something being an individual choice does not necessarily mean that it is morally acceptable, which is what I was trying to suggest.

I totally agree that the first commenter's attitude and approach was deeply flawed. There were a number of thoughtful commenters who took the latter route, but the first comment seems to have upset the OP to the extent that she didn't respond rationally at all. You're right that the latter example is much more effective, but the first one isn't really a suggestion at all, just an ad hominem attack.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]katarin
2007-01-07 03:09 am UTC (link)
Right, and seeing as the OP is seriously looking to breed her dog, actual attempts at education could have done quite a bit for her, that's all I was getting at.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nicolae
2007-01-07 03:12 am UTC (link)
Totally agreed. They didn't go about it very well (in terms of niceness or effectiveness), but that doesn't mean that they're wrong.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map