I HAV YUR IP IM GONNA GET YOUUUUU!1!!!
Found by way of stupid_free but this is too damn funny not to share.

softest_fire posts to caninecentral hoping to find someone with a female German shepherd that she can breed with (her dog, not her). First comment out points out how many dogs are killed in shelters because no one wants them and how she's just going to contribute to the problem.

softest_fire then proceeds to wank so hard she nearly breaks something off. Later on when someone makes a very polite, nice comment, she bites that person's head off as well.

Highlights:

- continuous incoherence and lack of grammar
- continuous lack of any kind of sense
- continuous threats that she knows people's IPs and will use that information to "get" them
- continuous threats that she has a lawyer and has contacted LJ legal and if they continue to contact her (in a public community post), she'll GET THEM!!

Userinfo says she's 28 but frankly it's like watching a bitchy 12 year-old having a total meltdown. Fun times.

EDIT: As others have pointed it, it took nine months for the responses to take off, and the wank isn't all

softest_fire's; some of the comm members have their moments of batshit as well.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

nicolae
2007-01-07 09:39 am UTC (link)

Obviously not all purebred dogs are healthier than all mixed-breed dogs, or vice versa. Maybe I should have phrased it as "dogs from reputable breeders" but those do tend to be purebred ones, because most good breeders are involved in conformance and/or obedience, and the former depends on breed.

I think comformance is pretty silly in general, although some rules are based on actual concerns about health problems, but limiting breeding to animals with good genes -- temperment, health, etc. -- doesn't seem like such a bad idea. There are a lot of purebred dogs with serious congenital problems, and the more popular breeds -- goldens, german shepherds, cocker spaniels -- tend to run the risk of that a lot more.

By "good bloodlines" I mean healthy dogs with good temperments -- I just think you're more likely to get that when the parents' ancestries are known quantities, and you're more likely to get that when there's been record-keeping, which tends to happen more with purebreds.

I don't mean to come off as a breed snob. We have two Australian shepherds, neither of whom meet the breed standard, and I would rather have a mixed-breed whose parents I knew were healthy than a purebred I didn't. My dogs aren't going to be shown, and I don't care if they look the right way; I just don't want them to get sick or die young, because I love them lots.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	napalmnacey 2007-01-07 10:00 am UTC (link)
	I just wanted to know where you were coming from. I may have come off more indignant than I actually was, but I totally understand where you're coming from. Breeding friendly, healthy dogs is never bad. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	nicolae 2007-01-07 10:01 am UTC (link)
	I didn't think you sounded angry! Just wanted to be sure I was being understood. :-) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	napalmnacey 2007-01-07 10:05 am UTC (link)
	Oh good, that's a relief! :D (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -