|
|
queencallipygos (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} queencallipygos) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank, |
I have said it before during the circumcision arguments, and I will say it again --
the "it loses sensitivity" argument doesn't hold water with me, because every one of the men I have been intimate with has attained orgasm, and all but one were circumsized. So I can only conclude that the circumsized male is plenty sensitive enough, because while I'm confident I'm good in bed, I don't think I'm that good.
the "it loses sensitivity" argument doesn't hold water with me, because every one of the men I have been intimate with has attained orgasm, and all but one were circumsized. So I can only conclude that the circumsized male is plenty sensitive enough, because while I'm confident I'm good in bed, I don't think I'm that good.
Post a comment in response:
